A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Three Experimental Drugs Compared With Telaprevir (a Licensed Product) in People With Hepatitis C Virus Infection Who Have Not Had Treatment Before (MALACHITE 1)

May 2, 2018 updated by: AbbVie

A Randomized, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ABT-450/Ritonavir/ABT-267 and ABT-333 Co-administered With and Without Ribavirin Compared to Telaprevir Co-administered With Pegylated Interferon α-2a and Ribavirin in Treatment-Naïve Adults With Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1 Virus Infection (MALACHITE I)

This is a study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three experimental drugs compared with telaprevir (a licensed product) in people with hepatitis C virus infection who have not had treatment before.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The primary purpose of this study is to demonstrate that treatment with ABT-450/ritonavir (r)/ABT-267 and ABT-333 administered with or without ribavirin (RBV) has non-inferior efficacy compared to treatment with telaprevir and pegylated interferon alpha-2a (pegIFN) and RBV and to compare the safety of these regimens in treatment-naive hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT) 1a- and 1b-infected adults.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

311

Phase

  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males or females between 18 and 65 years, inclusive, at time of Screening
  • Females must be post-menopausal for more than 2 years or surgically sterile or practicing abstinence/specific forms of birth control
  • Subject has never received antiviral treatment for hepatitis C infection
  • Chronic HCV Genotype-1 infection prior to study enrollment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Positive test result for Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or anti-Human Immunodeficiency virus antibody (HIV Ab)
  • Females who are pregnant or plan to become pregnant, or breastfeeding
  • Any current or past clinical evidence of cirrhosis
  • Screening laboratory analyses that showing abnormal laboratory results
  • Use of contraindicated medications within 2 weeks of dosing and subject with contraindication for telaprevir, pegIFN and RBV
  • Recent (within 6 months prior to study drug administration) history of drug or alcohol abuse that could preclude adherence to the protocol
  • Positive screen for drugs or alcohol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm A: 3-DAA + RBV in GT1a
ABT-450/r/ABT-267 150 mg/100 mg/25 mg once daily (QD) and ABT-333 250 mg twice daily (BID) and weight-based RBV for 12 weeks (3 direct-acting antivirals [DAAs] with RBV in GT1a)
Tablet
Tablet; ABT-450 coformulated with ritonavir and ABT-267, ABT-333 tablet
Other Names:
  • ABT-267 also known as ombitasvir
  • ABT-450 also known as paritaprevir
  • ABT-333 also known as dasabuvir
  • Viekira Pak
  • Holkira Pak
Active Comparator: Arm B: TPV/PR in GT1a
Telaprevir (TPV) 750 mg every 8 hours (q8h) and pegIFN 180 µg/week and weight-based RBV (PR) for 12 weeks followed by an additional 12 or 36 weeks of pegIFN and weight-based RBV according to response guided therapy per the prescribing information for telaprevir (telaprevir with pegIFN/RBV in GT1a)
Tablet
Film-coated tablet
Pre-filled syringe
Experimental: Arm C: 3-DAA + RBV in GT1b
ABT-450/r/ABT-267 150 mg/100 mg/25 mg QD and ABT-333 250 mg BID and weight-based RBV for 12 weeks (3 DAAs with RBV in GT1b)
Tablet
Tablet; ABT-450 coformulated with ritonavir and ABT-267, ABT-333 tablet
Other Names:
  • ABT-267 also known as ombitasvir
  • ABT-450 also known as paritaprevir
  • ABT-333 also known as dasabuvir
  • Viekira Pak
  • Holkira Pak
Experimental: Arm D: 3-DAA in GT1b
ABT-450/r/ABT-267 150 mg/100 mg/25 mg QD and ABT-333 250 mg BID for 12 weeks (3 DAAs without RBV in GT1b)
Tablet; ABT-450 coformulated with ritonavir and ABT-267, ABT-333 tablet
Other Names:
  • ABT-267 also known as ombitasvir
  • ABT-450 also known as paritaprevir
  • ABT-333 also known as dasabuvir
  • Viekira Pak
  • Holkira Pak
Active Comparator: Arm E: TPV/PR in GT1b
Telaprevir 750 mg q8h and pegIFN 180 µg/week and weight-based RBV for 12 weeks followed by an additional 12 or 36 weeks of pegIFN and weight-based RBV according to response guided therapy per the prescribing information for telaprevir (telaprevir with pegIFN/RBV in GT1b)
Tablet
Film-coated tablet
Pre-filled syringe

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 12 Weeks After Treatment (SVR12) - Primary Efficacy Analyses
Time Frame: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of active study drug
The percentage of participants with sustained virologic response (plasma Hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid [HCV RNA] level less than the lower limit of quantitation [< LLOQ]) 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
12 weeks after the last actual dose of active study drug

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change From Baseline to the Final Treatment Visit in Short-Form 36 Version 2 Health Status Survey (SF-36V2) Mental Component Summary (MCS)
Time Frame: From Day 1 of treatment up to 12 weeks for Arms A, C and D and up to 24 or 48 weeks for Arms B and E
SF-36V2 is a generic 36-item questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) covering 2 summary measures: physical component summary (PCS) and MCS; it consists of 8 subscales. The MCS is represented by 4 subscales: vitality, social function, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Participants self-report on items in a subscale that have choices per item. Scoring is done for both MCS subscale scores and summary scores; for each, the range is 0 (worst HRQoL) to 100 (best HRQoL).
From Day 1 of treatment up to 12 weeks for Arms A, C and D and up to 24 or 48 weeks for Arms B and E
Mean Change From Baseline to the Final Treatment Visit in SF-36V2 Physical Component Summary (PCS)
Time Frame: From Day 1 of treatment up to 12 weeks for Arms A, C and D and up to 24 or 48 weeks for Arms B and E
SF-36V2 is a generic 36-item questionnaire measuring HRQoL covering 2 summary measures: PCS and MCS; it consists of 8 subscales. The PCS is represented by 4 subscales: physical function, role limitations due to physical problems, bodily pain, and general health perception. Participants self-report on items in a subscale that have choices per item. Scoring is done for both PCS subscale scores and summary scores; for each, the range is 0 (worst HRQoL) to 100 (best HRQoL).
From Day 1 of treatment up to 12 weeks for Arms A, C and D and up to 24 or 48 weeks for Arms B and E
Percentage of Participants With SVR12 - Secondary Efficacy Analyses
Time Frame: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of active study drug
The percentage of participants with sustained virologic response (plasma HCV RNA level < LLOQ) 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
12 weeks after the last actual dose of active study drug
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Failure During Treatment
Time Frame: 12 weeks for Arms A, C and D and 24 weeks or 48 weeks for Arms B and E

Participants in Arms A, C or D demonstrating any of the following were considered virologic failures and discontinued therapy:

  • Confirmed increase from nadir in HCV RNA (defined as 2 consecutive HCV RNA measurements of >1 log10 IU/mL above nadir) at any time point during treatment
  • Failure to achieve HCV RNA < LLOQ by Week 6 or
  • Confirmed HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ (defined as 2 consecutive HCV RNA measurements ≥ LLOQ) at any point after HCV RNA < LLOQ during treatment after HCV RNA < LLOQ.

Participants in Arms B and E followed virologic stopping criteria described in the TPV Summary of Product Characteristics; they were considered virologic failures and discontinued therapy as follows:

  • HCV RNA > 1000 IU/mL at Week 4 to Week 12, discontinue TPV and pegIFN and RBV
  • HCV RNA > 1000 IU/mL at Week 12, discontinue pegIFN and RBV
  • Confirmed HCV RNA > lower limit of detection (LLOD) at Week 24, discontinue pegIFN and RBV
  • Confirmed HCV RNA > LLOD at Week 36, discontinue pegIFN and RBV.
12 weeks for Arms A, C and D and 24 weeks or 48 weeks for Arms B and E
Percentage of Participants With Post-treatment Relapse
Time Frame: Within 24 weeks post treatment
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) confirmed greater than or equal to the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) between the end of treatment and 24 weeks post treatment among participants completing treatment and with HCV RNA less than the LLOQ at the end of treatment.
Within 24 weeks post treatment
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 24 Weeks After Treatment (SVR24)
Time Frame: 24 weeks after the last actual dose of active study drug
The percentage of participants with sustained virologic response (plasma HCV RNA level < LLOQ) 24 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
24 weeks after the last actual dose of active study drug

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Yan Luo, MD, PhD, AbbVie

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

May 15, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 6, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Hepatitis C Infection

Clinical Trials on Ribavirin

Subscribe