HFR Cartridge and Inflammation (HFR)

May 28, 2013 updated by: Eleonora Riccio, Federico II University

Role of HFR Cartridge in the Removal of Mediators of Inflammation and P-cresol in Hemodialysis Patients

A major limitation of standard hemodialysis is that it does not clear the plasma from interleukin-6 (IL-6) and p-cresol, two uremic toxins responsible for the high cardiovascular risk in end stage renal disease (ESRD). In the present study, we evaluated whether these compounds are removed by HFR-Supra, a double-chamber hemodiafiltration system in which the ultrafiltrate (UF) returns to the patient after its regeneration through a resin cartridge. We selected 8 inflamed chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients, which underwent a single 240 minutes HFR session. We studied the change in both IL-6 and p-cresol circulating levels, by comparing pre- and post-HFR serum concentrations. In addition, we compared Il-6 and p-cresol levels in the UF entering (UFin) and exiting (UFout) from the cartridge, either at the start or at the end of the HFR session. The proinflammatory activity of UFin and UFout was determined by evaluating the changes that they induced in IL-6 messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) expression and release in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) collected from 8 healthy volunteers and cultured in vitro for 24 hr.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

8

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Naples, Italy, 80129
        • federico II university, department of nephrology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • HD patients undergoing three weekly haemodialysis > 1 year

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HFR
We selected 8 inflamed chronic HD patients, which underwent a single 240 minutes HFR session
HFR is a dialysis technique that combines the processes of diffusion, convection and adsorption. In this double chamber hemodiafiltration system, the ultrafiltrate is reinfused after its passage (and opportune modification) through a resin cartridge.
Other Names:
  • hmodiafiltration with on line reinfusion of ultrafiltrate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
IL-6 removal by a single session of HFR-Supra
Time Frame: The evaluation will be performed for the duration of a single HFR session of 240 minutes
We studied the change in IL-6 circulating levels, by comparing pre- and post-HFR serum concentrations. In addition, we compared IL-6 levels in the UF entering (UFin) and exiting (UFout) from the cartridge, either at the start or at the end of the HFR session. The proinflammatory activity of UFin and UFout was determined by evaluating the changes that they induced in IL-6 mRNA expression and release in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) collected from 8 healthy volunteers and cultured in vitro for 24 hr.
The evaluation will be performed for the duration of a single HFR session of 240 minutes
P-cresol removal by a single HFR session
Time Frame: The evaluation will be performed for the duration of a single HFR session of 240 minutes
We studied the change in p-cresol circulating levels, by comparing pre- and post-HFR serum concentrations. In addition, we compared p-cresol levels in the UF entering (UFin) and exiting (UFout) from the cartridge, either at the start or at the end of the HFR session.
The evaluation will be performed for the duration of a single HFR session of 240 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 23, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

May 31, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 31, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2013

Last Verified

April 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HFR13
  • HFRinflamm

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Inflammatory Status

Clinical Trials on HFR dialysis

Subscribe