Hemo Filtration Reinfusion (HFR) Clearance Efficiency Towards P-bound Toxins and Effects on Inflammatory and Endothelial Damage Markers (SUPREMO)

March 27, 2015 updated by: Alejandro Martin-Malo, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia de Cordoba

Removal of Uremic Toxins and Improvement of Chronic Inflammation With HFR in Comparison With "On-Line" Hemodiafiltration and High Flux Hemodialysis.

The aim of this study is to compare purification efficiency of HFR in terms of clearance of protein-bound toxins and the effects on markers of inflammation and endothelial damage, in comparison to HF-HD and OL-HDF.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Protein-bound uremic toxins are poorly removed by current dialysis techniques because of their size, which is larger than the pore size of dialysis membranes available in the market. These protein-bound uremic toxins have emerged as important risk factors for progression of CKD, as well as for cardiovascular disease. Several studies have demonstrated that protein-bound uremic toxins induce vascular inflammation, endothelial dysfunction and vascular calcification.

In dialysis patients, serum concentrations of p-cresyl sulphate and indoxyl sulphate are approximately 17 and 54 times higher, respectively, than in healthy subjects. Because these toxins are bound to proteins, only a 30% or less is removed efficiently by hemodialysis. Traditional renal replacement therapies depend upon diffusion and convection for solute clearances and the use of an adsorbent in combination with dialysis membranes may be a new therapeutic option to increase removal rate of these uremic protein-bound toxins.

HFR technique uses a dual dialyzer with a resin between chambers. The first chamber is a high-flux membrane where convective process takes place. The ultrafiltrate obtained from this first chamber passes through the cartridge and is reinfused before the second chamber, a low-flux membrane, where diffusive process is performed.

In HFR, adsorption and haemodiafiltration are attached, using ultrafiltrate as a replacement fluid and being capable of theoretically removing most medium and high molecular weight uremic toxins. A potential benefit has been regarded for toxicity, biocompatibility, tolerance, and preservation of essential elements such as albumin, vitamins, amino acids or growth factors. An improvement on oxidative stress has also been described in HFR.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

9

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cordoba, Spain
        • HU Reina Sofia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients undergoing dialysis three times week

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Stable patients on hemodialysis for al least 3 month
  • older than 18 year old
  • dialyzed at least for two months with a high-flux membrane permeability
  • arteriovenous fistula with high blood flow (> 350 ml / min)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • active neoplasia
  • positive viral markers (HBsAg, anti-HCV and HIV),
  • clinical signs of active infection and/or inflammation,
  • albumin < 3.5 g/dl.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Inflammatory status: (CD14+ CD16+, CD14++ CD16+, cytokines levels)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 10, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

September 15, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 30, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2015

Last Verified

March 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CRB2014

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Inflammation

Clinical Trials on SUPRA HFR

3
Subscribe