Lutonix DCB Versus Standard Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of Below-The-Knee (BTK) Arteries

February 3, 2022 updated by: C. R. Bard

A Prospective, Multicenter, Single Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing the Lutonix Drug Coated Balloon Versus Standard Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of Below-the-Knee (BTK) Arteries(Lutonix BTK Trial)

To assess the safety and efficacy of the Lutonix Drug Coated Balloon (DCB) for treatment of stenosis or occlusion of native below-the-knee arteries.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

442

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Graz, Austria, A-8036
        • Medical University Graz
      • Genk, Belgium, 3600
        • ZOL St. jan
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G2M9
        • University Health Network
      • Arnsberg, Germany, 59759
        • Klinik für Kardiologie • Klinikum Arnsberg GmbH
      • Bad Krozingen, Germany, 79189
        • Universitaets Herzzentrum Freiburg/Bad Krozingen
      • Heidelberg, Germany, 69120
        • Med. Universitaet Heidelberg,Herzzentrum (Abteilung Innere Medizin III)
      • Immenstadt, Germany, 87509
        • Hospital Kempten
      • Leipzig, Germany, 04103
        • Universitaetsklinikum Leipzig Medical Centre
      • Münster, Germany, 48149
        • Universitätsklinikum Münster, Innere Medizin C
      • Sonneberg, Germany, 96515
        • Medinos Kliniken des Landkriess Sonneberg GmbH
      • Tübingen, Germany, 72076
        • University of Tubingen, Dept. of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
      • Cotignola, Italy
        • Maria Cecilia Hospital
      • Kasukabe, Japan, 344-0063
        • Kasukabe Chuo General Hospital
      • Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 105-0003
        • The Jikei University Hospital
      • Osaka, Japan, 536-0025
        • Morinomiya Hospital
      • Osaka, Japan, 596-8522
        • Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital
      • Tokyo, Japan, 153-8515
        • Toho University
      • Luzern, Switzerland, 6000
        • Kantonsspital Luzern
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06510
        • Yale University-Yale New Haven Hospital
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20010
        • MedStar Washington Hospital Center
    • Florida
      • Bradenton, Florida, United States, 34208
        • Cardiovascular Solutions Institute, LLC
      • Clearwater, Florida, United States, 33756
        • Morton Plant Mease Health Care, Inc
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32611
        • University of Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32605
        • Cardiovascular Research of North Florida, LLC
      • Lakeland, Florida, United States, 33805
        • Radiology and Imaging Specialists of Lakeland, P.A
      • Miami Beach, Florida, United States, 33140
        • Mt. Sinai Medical Center
    • Illinois
      • Springfield, Illinois, United States, 62701
        • Prairie Education and Research Cooperative
    • Iowa
      • West Des Moines, Iowa, United States, 50266
        • Central Iowa Hospital Corporation
    • Louisiana
      • Houma, Louisiana, United States, 70360
        • CIS Clinical Research Corporation
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02135
        • Steward St. Elizabeth Medical Center of Boston
    • Michigan
      • Wyoming, Michigan, United States, 49519
        • Metro Health-University of Michigan Health Hospital
    • Mississippi
      • Jackson, Mississippi, United States, 39216
        • Jackson Heart Clinic, P.A.
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Barnes Jewish Hospital
    • New Jersey
      • Browns Mills, New Jersey, United States, 08015
        • Deborah Heart & Lung Ctr
      • Teaneck, New Jersey, United States, 07666
        • Holy Name Medical Center
    • New Mexico
      • Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87102
        • New Mexico Heart Institute, LLC
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Mount Sinai School of Medicine
    • North Carolina
      • Raleigh, North Carolina, United States, 27607
        • NC Heart & Vascular Research
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45220
        • Trihealth Heart Institute
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43214-3907
        • OhioHealth Corporation
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97225
        • Providence Health & Service - Oregon
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02906
        • The Miriam Hospital - A Lifespan Partner
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Medical University of South Carolina
    • Tennessee
      • Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States, 37403
        • University Surgical Associates, LLC
      • Kingsport, Tennessee, United States, 37660
        • Wellmont Cardiology Services, Inc.
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78756
        • Austin Heart PLLC
    • Virginia
      • Norfolk, Virginia, United States, 23507
        • Sentara Medical Group
    • West Virginia
      • Charleston, West Virginia, United States, 25304
        • Charleston Area Medical Center Health System
    • Wisconsin
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53215
        • Aurora St. Luke's Vascular Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or non-pregnant female ≥18 years of age;
  • Rutherford Clinical Category 3, 4 & 5;
  • Life expectancy ≥ 1 year;
  • Significant stenosis (≥70%)
  • A patent inflow artery;
  • Target vessel(s) diameter between 2 and 4 mm;
  • Target vessel(s) reconstitute(s) at or above the ankle

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or planning on becoming pregnant;
  • History of stroke within 3 months;
  • History of MI, thrombolysis or angina within 30 days of enrollment;
  • Planned major amputation (of either leg)
  • Prior major amputation if amputation occurred less than one year prior to enrollment and if patient is not independently ambulating;
  • GFR ≤ 30 ml/min per 1.73m2;
  • Acute limb ischemia;
  • In-stent restenosis of target lesion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Lutonix DCB
Lutonix Paclitaxel Drug Coated Balloon
Other Names:
  • LTX DCB
Active Comparator: PTA Catheter
Standard Uncoated PTA Catheter
Other Names:
  • PTA

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Freedom From Below-the-Knee (BTK) Major Adverse Limb Event and Peri-Operative Death (POD) at 30 Days Post Index Procedure.
Time Frame: 30 days post index procedure
The primary safety endpoint is defined as freedom from the composite of all-cause death, above-ankle amputation or major reintervention (new bypass graft, jump/interposition graft revision, or thrombectomy/thrombolysis) of the index limb involving a below-the-knee artery.
30 days post index procedure
Number of Participants With Freedom From the Composite of Above-ankle Amputation, Target Lesion Occlusion, and Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization at 6 Months Post Index Procedure.
Time Frame: 6 months post-index procedure
The primary efficacy endpoint is defined as freedom from the composite of above-ankle amputation, target lesion occlusion, and clinically-driven target lesion revascularization. All amputations included in endpoints refer to amputations in the index limb.
6 months post-index procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Lesions Considered Technical Success at Time of Index Procedure
Time Frame: At time of index procedure
Technical Success: A success is determined if the device success was achieved and a final residual stenosis post study device (DCB or placebo) dilatation ≤ 30% was reported.
At time of index procedure
Percentage of Procedures With Procedural Success at Time of Index Procedure.
Time Frame: At time of Index Procedure
A success is determined if there is restoration of at least 1 infrapopliteal artery with residual stenosis ≤ 30% (or ≤ 50% depending upon the version of the protocol) and inline outflow to the foot, irrespective of device success, and without a major adverse event during the index procedure.
At time of Index Procedure
Comparison of the Below the Knee (BTK) Major Adverse Limb Event (MALE) and Perioperative Death (POD) Rate to a Performance Goal at 30 Days Post Index Procedure.
Time Frame: 30 days post index procedure
30 days post index procedure
Change in European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EuroQol -5D) Scores at 30 Days, 6 and 12 Months Compared to Baseline.
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure compared to baseline
Mean change in EuroQol (EQ-5D) scores at 30 days, 6, and 12 months compared to baseline. The EurolQol-5D system rates quality of life using five dimensions including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels of ratings, that is, no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems that can be selected. A visual scale allows participants to report their own perception of their health status. The overall scores range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Please note that the data in the table below represent the mean changes in overall scores for each group compared to their baseline data. Results for 24 and 36 months will be reported when the final Clinical Study Report becomes available.
30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure compared to baseline
Late Lumen Loss at 12 Months Post Index Procedure
Time Frame: 12 months post-index procedure
12 months post-index procedure
Number of Healed Wounds at 30 Days, 6 and 12 Months Post Index Procedure
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure
Results for 24 and 36 months will be reported when the final Clinical Study Report becomes available. The number of wounds analyzed at 6 and 12 months post-index procedure includes wounds that may have appeared (new wounds) since the previous time period reporting.
30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure
Number of Non-Healed Wounds by Category (Improving, Stagnant and Worsening) at 30 Days, 6 and 12 Months Post-Index Procedure.
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure
30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure
Percentage of Existing, New, and Recurrent Wounds at 30 Days, 6 and 12 Months Post Index Procedure.
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure
Results for 24 and 36 months will be reported when the final Clinical Study Report becomes available.
30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure
Change in Rutherford Classification Scores at 30 Days, 6 and 12 Months Post Index Procedure Compared to Baseline.
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure compared to baseline

The endpoint summarizes the change in index-limb Rutherford Classification of participants from baseline through 36 months. Data is presented as shift from baseline Rutherford Classification data using the following categories: 1) Improvement, 2) Same, and 3) Worsened.

Results for 24 and 36 months will be reported when the final Clinical Study Report becomes available.

30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure compared to baseline
Number of Participants With Freedom From Above Ankle Amputation, Unhealed Wound, Ischemic Rest Pain, Target Vessel Occlusion, and Clinically-Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) at 30 Days, 6 and 12 Months Post Index Procedure.
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure

The composite endpoint of freedom from above ankle amputation (CEC-adjudicated), unhealed wound (presence of wound vs. no wound), ischemic rest pain (Rutherford category 4 or higher), target vessel occlusion (based on DUS and/or angiograph), and clinically-driven TVR (CEC-adjudicated).

Results for 24 and 36 months will be reported when the final Clinical Study Report becomes available.

30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Primary Patency Failure at 30 Days, 6 and 12 Months Post Index Procedure
Time Frame: 30 days and at 6 and 12 months

Primary patency is defined as the absence of both total occlusion (100% diameter stenosis) in all of the target lesions in a flow pathway as well as a clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR).

Results for 24 and 36 months will be reported when the final Clinical Study Report becomes available.

30 days and at 6 and 12 months
Percentage of Lesions With Primary Patency Excluding Early Mechanical Recoil at 30 Days, 6 and 12 Months Post Index Procedure
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure

Primary patency with exclusion of early mechanical recoil of the target flow pathway is defined as the absence of both total occlusion (100% diameter stenosis) of the target lesions and clinically-driven TLR events > 30 days.

Results for 24 and 36 months will be reported when the final Clinical Study Report becomes available.

30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure
Number of Lesions With Secondary Patency at 30 Days, 6 and 12 Months Post Index Procedure
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure

The secondary patency of the target lesion is defined as the absence of total occlusion (100% diameter stenosis) of the target lesions based on angiography (if performed) or ultrasound as analyzed by the angiographic Core Lab.

Results for 24 and 36 months will be reported when the final Clinical Study Report becomes available.

30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure
Composite of Freedom From Clinically -Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) and From 50% DS by Angiography or Duplex Ultrasound at 30 Days, 6 and 12 Months Post Index Procedure.
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure
30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure
Change in Toe Brachial Index (TBI) at 30 Days, 6 and 12 Months Post Index Procedure Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure compared to baseline

Mean change from baseline values. The Toe Brachial Index (TBI) is defined as a ratio of toe to brachial (upper arm) artery systolic blood pressure and aims at determining how well the blood is flowing in the legs.

Results for 24 and 36 months will be reported when the final Clinical Study Report becomes available.

30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure compared to baseline
Change in Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) at 30 Days, 6 and 12 Months Post Index Procedure Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: 30 days, and at 6 and 12 months compared to baseline

Mean change from baseline values. The Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) is defined as a ratio of ankle to brachial (upper arm) artery systolic blood pressure and aims at determining how well the blood is flowing in the legs.

Results for 24 and 36 months will be reported when the final Clinical Study Report becomes available.

30 days, and at 6 and 12 months compared to baseline
Change in Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) Scores at 30 Days, 6 and 12 Months Post Index Procedure Compared to Baseline.
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure compared to baseline

The WIQ assesses 3 categories of activities that include 1) walking distance, 2) stair-climbing, and 3) walking speed. Each question requires participants to rate their degree of difficulty with the activity on a scale of 0 (unable) to 4 (no problem). Final scores range from 0% to 100%, with lower percentages indicating higher levels of difficulties with activities.The results below represent the mean differences in total Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) scores at 30 days 6 and 12 months, compared to baseline assessment scores.

Results for 24 and 36 months will be reported when the final Clinical Study Report becomes available.

30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure compared to baseline
Number of Participants With Clinically-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) at 30 Days, 6 and 12 Months Post Index Procedure
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure
30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure
Cumulative Number of Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) at 30 Days, 6 and 12 Months Post Index Procedure.
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure
Results for 24 and 36 months will be reported when the final Clinical Study Report becomes available.
30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure
Number of Participants With Clinically-Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) at 30 Days, 6 and 12 Months Post Index Procedure.
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure
30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure
Cumulative Number of Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) at 30 Days, 6 and 12 Months Post Index Procedure.
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure
30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Limb Amputation at 30 Days, 6 and 12 Months Post Index Procedure
Time Frame: 30 days and at 6 and 12 months
Limb salvage defined as no amputation of target limb.
30 days and at 6 and 12 months
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Unplanned Below the Knee (BTK) Amputation of the Target Limb at 30 Days, 6 and 12 Months Post Index Procedure.
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure
Defined as amputation that was below the ankle, including digit amputation. Results for 24 and 36 months will be reported when the final Clinical Study Report becomes available.
30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure
Cumulative Number of of Below the Knee (BTK) Index-Limb Reinterventions at 30 Days, 6 and 12 Months Post Index Procedure.
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure

The overall burden of BTK reinterventions was defined as the total number of BTK index-limb re-interventions and major amputations for each time point.

Results for 24 and 36 months will be reported when the final Clinical Study Report becomes available.

30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Composite of Perioperative Death (POD), Index Limb-related Death, Below the Knee Reinterventions or Major Amputations of the Index Limb at 30 Days, 6 and 12 Months Post Index Procedure
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure
Results for 24 and 36 months will be reported when the final Clinical Study Report becomes available.
30 days, 6 and 12 months post index procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Patrick Geraghty, MD, Washington University School of Medicine
  • Principal Investigator: Marianne Brodmann, MD, Medical University Graz, Austria

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 3, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 17, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

June 22, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 7, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

June 6, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CL0005-01

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critical Limb Ischemia

Clinical Trials on Lutonix DCB

3
Subscribe