A Study of Alectinib (CH5424802/RO5424802) in Participants With Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK)-Rearranged Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

A Phase I/II Study of the ALK Inhibitor CH5424802/ RO5424802 in Patients With ALK-Rearranged Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With Crizotinib

This non-randomized, open-label, multicenter study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of alectinib in participants with ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer who failed crizotinib treatment. In Phase I, cohorts of participants will receive escalating doses of alectinib orally twice daily. In Phase II, patients who failed crizotinib treatment will receive the recommended phase II dose.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
• Intervention / Treatment: Drug: Alectinib

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 134
• Phase: Phase 2; Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Canada
  • Alberta
    • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 1Z2
      • Cross Cancer Institute
  • Ontario
    • Oshawa, Ontario, Canada, L1G 2B9
      • Lakeridge Health Oshawa; Oncology
  • Quebec
    • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3T 1E2
      • McGill University; Sir Mortimer B Davis Jewish General Hospital; Oncology
• United States
  • Alabama
    • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
      • University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • California
    • Irvine, California, United States, 92697
      • University of California Irvine
    • La Jolla, California, United States, 92093
      • UCSD Moores Cancer Center
    • Loma Linda, California, United States, 92354
      • Loma Linda Cancer Center
    • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
      • UCLA
  • Colorado
    • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
      • Univ of Colorado Canc Ctr
    • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80206
      • National Jewish Health
  • Florida
    • Boca Raton, Florida, United States, 33486
      • Lynn Regional Cancer Center West
    • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32804
      • Florida Hospital Cancer Inst
    • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32806
      • UF Health Orlando
    • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
      • H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Inst.
  • Illinois
    • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
      • University of Illinois Cancer Center
    • Harvey, Illinois, United States, 60426
      • Monroe Medical Associates; Ingalls Memorial Hosp
  • Massachusetts
    • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
      • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
    • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
      • Dana Farber Can Ins
    • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
      • Massachussets General Hospital
    • Newton, Massachusetts, United States, 02462
      • Newton-Wellesley Hospital
  • Michigan
    • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48106
      • St. Joseph Mercy Hospital; Cancer Care Center.
    • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48201
      • Wayne State Uni ; Karmanos Cancer Center
  • New Jersey
    • Hackensack, New Jersey, United States, 07601
      • Hackensack Univ Med Ctr
  • New York
    • Buffalo, New York, United States, 14263
      • Roswell Park Cancer Inst.
    • Commack, New York, United States, 11725
      • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
    • Staten Island, New York, United States, 10310
      • Richmond University Medical Center; Pharmacy Department
  • North Carolina
    • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
      • Wake Forest University Health Sciences
  • Ohio
    • Canton, Ohio, United States, 44718
      • Gabrail Cancer Center
    • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
      • The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
  • Oregon
    • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
      • Oregon Health & Science Uni
    • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97213
      • Providence Portland Med Ctr
  • Pennsylvania
    • Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States, 18015
      • St. Luke's Hospital; Pharmacy Department
    • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033
      • Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute
    • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19111
      • Fox Chase Cancer Center
    • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15232
      • University of Pittsburgh Cancer Pavillion
  • South Carolina
    • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
      • MUSC Hollings Cancer Center
  • Tennessee
    • Knoxville, Tennessee, United States, 37909
      • Center for Biomedical Research LLC
  • Texas
    • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75246
      • Texas Oncology-Baylor Sammons Cancer Center
    • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
      • MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • Virginia
    • Fairfax, Virginia, United States, 22031
      • Virginia Cancer Specialists, PC
  • Washington
    • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98104
      • Swedish Cancer Inst.
  • Wisconsin
    • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53792
      • University of Wisconsin

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Histologically confirmed, locally advanced, not amenable to curative therapy, or metastatic NSCLC
• ALK-rearrangement confirmed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved test
• NSCLC that has failed crizotinib treatment
• Measurable disease as defined by RECIST v1.1
• Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status less than or equal to (<=) 2
• Adequate hematologic, hepatic and renal function

Exclusion Criteria:

• Prior therapy with ALK inhibitor other than crizotinib
• Brain or leptomeningeal metastases that are symptomatic and/or requiring treatment
• History of serious cardiac dysfunction
• History of or current active infection with hepatitis B, hepatitis C or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
• Clinically significant gastrointestinal abnormality that would affect absorption of the drug
• Pregnant or lactating women

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Non-Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Alectinib: Phase I (Dose Escalation); Participants will receive escalating doses of alectinib capsules orally until disease progression, death or withdrawal for any other reasons.	Drug: Alectinib; Participants will receive alectinib as described in the arm descriptions.; Other Names: RO5424802; CH5424802
Experimental: Alectinib (Phase II: RP2 dose); Participants will receive recommended Phase II dose as determined from Phase I until disease progression, death or withdrawal for any other reasons.	Drug: Alectinib; Participants will receive alectinib as described in the arm descriptions.; Other Names: RO5424802; CH5424802

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs): Phase I	The DLTs were defined as any which included Grade 4 thrombocytopenia or Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding or Grade 4 neutropenia continuing for greater than equal to (>=) 7 consecutive days, non-hematological toxicity of Grade 3 or higher (excluding transient electrolyte abnormalities, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting that recovers to Grade 2 or lower with appropriate treatment and participants having Grade 2 aspartate transaminase (AST) and/or alanine transaminase (ALT) at baseline must have Grade 3 AST/ALT for 7 days or Grade 4 AST/ALT to be considered a DLT), and adverse events (AEs) that required suspension of treatment for a total of >=7 days which the Investigator could not rule out as been related to alectinib.	Throughout Cycle 1 of Phase I (21 days)
Recommended Phase II Dose (RP2D): Phase I	RP2D was defined as the highest dose with acceptable toxicity as determined from Phase I of the study.	Throughout Cycle 1 of Phase I (21 days)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) by Independent Review Committee (IRC): Phase II	Percentage of participants with objective response as assessed by IRC was defined as the percentage of responders in the response evaluable population, where responders were defined as participants determined to have a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on the RECIST v1.1 criteria. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (TLs) and normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures less than (<) 10 millimeter (mm). PR: at least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of measures (longest diameter for tumor lesions and short axis measure for nodes) of TLs, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR and PR were to be confirmed by repeat assessments >=4 weeks after initial documentation. Clopper-Pearson method was used to calculate 95% confidence interval (CI).	Cycle 1 Day 1 up to 194 weeks (assessed at every 6 weeks from Cycle 1 Day 1, at Cycles 2, 4, and 6 between Days 14-21, and every 3 cycles thereafter) (1 cycle = 21 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST v1.1 by Investigator: Phase I	Percentage of participants with objective response as assessed by Investigator was defined as the percentage of responders in the response evaluable population, where responders were defined as participants determined to have a best overall response of CR or PR based on the RECIST v1.1 criteria. CR: disappearance of all target and non-TLs and normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures <10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of measures (longest diameter for tumor lesions and short axis measure for nodes) of TLs, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR and PR were to be confirmed by repeat assessments >=4 weeks after initial documentation. Clopper-Pearson method was used to calculate 95% CI. Data for this outcome were reported for 'alectinib 600 mg' and 'alectinib other than 600 mg' groups as planned.	Every 6 weeks from Cycle 1 Day 1, at Cycles 2, 4, and 6 between Days 14-21, and every 3 cycles thereafter (assessed up to 194 weeks) (1 cycle = 21 days)
Duration of Response (DOR) According to RECIST v1.1 by Investigator: Phase I	DOR was defined for responders (CR or PR) as the time from when response was first documented, to first documented disease progression (according to RECIST v1.1) or death (whichever occurred first). Participants who did not progress or did not die after they had a response were censored at date of their last tumor measurement. Progressive disease (PD): at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions compared to the smallest sum of diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions. Refer "Outcome Measure 2" for the definition of CR and PR. The median time to the event was estimated using the methodology of Kaplan-Meier. Brookmeyer-Crowley method was used to calculate 95% CI. Data for this outcome were reported for 'alectinib 600 mg' and 'alectinib other than 600 mg' groups as planned.	Every 6 weeks from Cycle 1 Day 1, at Cycles 2, 4, and 6 between Days 14-21, and every 3 cycles thereafter (assessed up to 194 weeks) (1 cycle = 21 days)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST v1.1 by Investigator: Phase II	Percentage of participants with objective response as assessed by Investigator was defined as the percentage of responders in the response evaluable population, where responders were defined as participants determined to have a best overall response of CR or PR based on the RECIST v1.1 criteria. CR: disappearance of all target and non-TLs and normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures <10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of measures (longest diameter for tumor lesions and short axis measure for nodes) of TLs, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR and PR were to be confirmed by repeat assessments >=4 weeks after initial documentation. Clopper-Pearson method was used to calculate 95% CI.	Every 6 weeks from Cycle 1 Day 1, at Cycles 2, 4, and 6 between Days 14-21, and every 3 cycles thereafter (assessed up to 194 weeks) (1 cycle = 21 days)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST v1.1 by Investigator: Phase II	Disease control rate assessed according to RECIST v1.1 was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) lasting for at least 12 weeks, after the first dose of alectinib. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters on study. PD: at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions compared to the smallest sum of diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions. CR: disappearance of all target and non-TLs and normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures <10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of measures (longest diameter for tumor lesions and short axis measure for nodes) of TLs, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. 95% CI for rate was constructed using Clopper-Pearson method.	Every 6 weeks from Cycle 1 Day 1, at Cycles 2, 4, and 6 between Days 14-21, and every 3 cycles thereafter (assessed up to 194 weeks) (1 cycle = 21 days)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression According to RECIST v1.1 by IRC or Death : Phase II	Percentage of participants with disease progression according to RECIST v1.1 by IRC is defined as the participants with at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions compared to the smallest sum of diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions.	Every 6 weeks from Cycle 1 Day 1, at Cycles 2, 4, and 6 between Days 14-21, and every 3 cycles thereafter (assessed up to 194 weeks) (1 cycle = 21 days)
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) According to RECIST v1.1 by IRC: Phase II	PFS was defined as the time between first dose of alectinib and date of first documented disease progression according to RECIST v1.1 or death, whichever occurred first. Participants who have neither progressed nor died at the time of the last clinical cut-off or who lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment showing no progression of disease either during the study treatment or during follow-up. Participants with no post-baseline assessments were censored at the date of first dose. Progression of disease is defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions compared to the smallest sum of diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions. The median time to the event was estimated using the methodology of Kaplan-Meier. Brookmeyer-Crowley method was used to calculate 95% CI.	Every 6 weeks from Cycle 1 Day 1, at Cycles 2, 4, and 6 between Days 14-21, and every 3 cycles thereafter (assessed up to 194 weeks) (1 cycle = 21 days)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression According to RECIST v1.1 by Investigator or Death : Phase II	Percentage of participants with disease progression according to RECIST v1.1 by investigator is defined as the participants with at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions compared to the smallest sum of diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions.	Every 6 weeks from Cycle 1 Day 1, at Cycles 2, 4, and 6 between Days 14-21, and every 3 cycles thereafter (assessed up to 194 weeks) (1 cycle = 21 days)
PFS According to RECIST v1.1 by Investigator: Phase II	PFS was defined as the time between first dose of alectinib and date of first documented disease progression according to RECIST v1.1 or death, whichever occurred first. Participants who have neither progressed nor died at the time of the last clinical cut-off or who lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment showing no progression of disease either during the study treatment or during follow-up. Participants with no post-baseline assessments were censored at the date of first dose. Progression of disease is defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions compared to the smallest sum of diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions. The median time to the event was estimated using the methodology of Kaplan-Meier. Brookmeyer-Crowley method was used to calculate 95% CI.	Every 6 weeks from Cycle 1 Day 1, at Cycles 2, 4, and 6 between Days 14-21, and every 3 cycles thereafter (assessed up to 194 weeks) (1 cycle = 21 days)
Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to Any Cause: Phase II		Baseline up to death (any cause) (maximum follow up 284 weeks)
Overall Survival (OS) Time: Phase II	OS was defined as the time between date of first dose and date of death due to any cause. Participants without an event were censored at the date last known to be alive. Participants without any follow-up information were censored at the date of first dose. The median time to the event was estimated using the methodology of Kaplan-Meier. Brookmeyer-Crowley method was used to calculate 95% CI.	Baseline up to death (any cause) (maximum follow up 284 weeks)
DOR According to RECIST v1.1 by IRC: Phase II	DOR was defined for responders (CR or PR) as the time from when response was first documented, to first documented disease progression (according to RECIST v1.1) or death (whichever occurred first). Participants who did not progress or did not die after they had a response were censored at date of their last tumor measurement. Progressive disease (PD): at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions compared to the smallest sum of diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions. Refer "Outcome Measure 2" for the definition of CR and PR. The median time to the event was estimated using the methodology of Kaplan-Meier. Brookmeyer-Crowley method was used to calculate 95% CI.	Every 6 weeks from Cycle 1 Day 1, at Cycles 2, 4, and 6 between Days 14-21, and every 3 cycles thereafter (assessed up to 194 weeks) (1 cycle = 21 days)
DOR According to RECIST v1.1 by Investigator: Phase II	DOR was defined for responders (CR or PR) as the time from when response was first documented, to first documented disease progression (according to RECIST v1.1) or death (whichever occurred first). Participants who did not progress or did not die after they had a response were censored at date of their last tumor measurement. Progressive disease (PD): at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions compared to the smallest sum of diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions. Refer "Outcome Measure 2" for the definition of CR and PR. The median time to the event was estimated using the methodology of Kaplan-Meier. Brookmeyer-Crowley method was used to calculate 95% CI.	Every 6 weeks from Cycle 1 Day 1, at Cycles 2, 4, and 6 between Days 14-21, and every 3 cycles thereafter (assessed up to 194 weeks) (1 cycle = 21 days)
Percentage of Participants With Central Nervous System Objective Response (COR) According to RECIST v1.1 by IRC: Phase II	COR rate (CORR) was defined as the percentage of participants who had a CR or PR of the baseline central nervous system (CNS) lesions, based on RECIST v.1.1. CNS responses according to RECIST v1.1 did not have to be confirmed. CR was defined as disappearance of all CNS lesions. PR was defined as >=30% decrease in the sum of diameters of measurable CNS lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters). 95% CI was computed using the Clopper-Pearson method.	Every 6 weeks from Cycle 1 Day 1, at Cycles 2, 4, and 6 between Days 14-21, and every 3 cycles thereafter (assessed up to 194 weeks) (1 cycle = 21 days)
Percentage of Participants With COR According to Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Criteria by IRC: Phase II	CORR was defined as the percentage of participants who had a CR or PR according to RANO criteria of the baseline CNS lesions. As per RANO criteria, CR was defined as disappearance of all enhancing measurable and non-measurable disease, and no new lesions along with stable or clinically improved status, participants off corticosteroids (or on physiologic replacement doses only) and stable or improved non enhancing T2/FLAIR lesions; PR was defined as 50% or more decrease in sum of the products of the diameters (SPD) of measurable enhancing measurable lesions, no new lesion along with stable or clinically improved status, participants off corticosteroids (or on physiologic replacement doses only) and no progression of non-measurable disease (enhancing and non-enhancing T2/FLAIR lesions. Clopper-Pearson method was used to calculate 95% CI.	Every 6 weeks from Cycle 1 Day 1, at Cycles 2, 4, and 6 between Days 14-21, and every 3 cycles thereafter (assessed up to 194 weeks) (1 cycle = 21 days)
CNS Duration of Response (CDOR) According to RECIST v1.1 by IRC: Phase II	CDOR was defined for CNS responders as the time from the first observation of a CNS response of CR or PR until first observation of CNS progression or death from any cause. An analysis by IRC using RECIST v1.1 was performed. PD: at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions compared to the smallest sum of diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, or presence of new lesions. CR was defined as disappearance of all CNS lesions. PR was defined as >=30% decrease in the sum of diameters of measurable CNS lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters). The median time to the event was estimated using the methodology of Kaplan-Meier. Brookmeyer-Crowley method was used to calculate 95% CI.	Every 6 weeks from Cycle 1 Day 1, at Cycles 2, 4, and 6 between Days 14-21, and every 3 cycles thereafter (assessed up to 194 weeks) (1 cycle = 21 days)
CDOR According to RANO Criteria by IRC: Phase II	CDOR was defined as the time from the first observation of a CNS response of CR or PR according to RANO criteria until first observation of CNS progression or death from any cause. An analysis by RANO criteria was performed. Definitions of CR or PR as per RANO was included in description of Outcome Measure 17. As per RANO criteria, progression was defined as 25% or more increase in SPD of measurable enhancing (measurable) compared to the best response after initiation of therapy or Screening; increase (significant) in non-enhancing T2/FLAIR lesions, not attributable to other non-tumor causes; any new lesions; and clinical deterioration (not attributable to other non-tumor causes and not due to steroid decrease) and clear worsening of neurological status with respect to the previous timepoint. The median time to the event was estimated using the methodology of Kaplan-Meier. Brookmeyer-Crowley method was used to calculate 95% CI.	Every 6 weeks from Cycle 1 Day 1, at Cycles 2, 4, and 6 between Days 14-21, and every 3 cycles thereafter (assessed up to 194 weeks) (1 cycle = 21 days)
Percentage of Participants With CNS Progression According to RECIST v1.1 by IRC: Phase II	CNS disease progression was defined as a new CNS lesion or progression of pre-existing CNS lesions according to RECIST v1.1. PD: at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions compared to the smallest sum of diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions.	Every 6 weeks from Cycle 1 Day 1, at Cycles 2, 4, and 6 between Days 14-21, and every 3 cycles thereafter (assessed up to 194 weeks) (1 cycle = 21 days)
Percentage of Participants With CNS Progression According to RANO Criteria by IRC: Phase II	CNS disease progression was defined as a new CNS lesion or progression of pre-existing CNS lesions according to RANO criteria. As per RANO criteria, progression was defined as 25% or more increase in SPD of measurable enhancing (measurable) compared to the best response after initiation of therapy or Screening; increase (significant) in non-enhancing T2/FLAIR lesions, not attributable to other non-tumor causes; any new lesions; and clinical deterioration (not attributable to other non-tumor causes and not due to steroid decrease).	Every 6 weeks from Cycle 1 Day 1, at Cycles 2, 4, and 6 between Days 14-21, and every 3 cycles thereafter (assessed up to 194 weeks) (1 cycle = 21 days)
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) After Single Dose of Alectinib: Phase I		Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 24, 32 and 48 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day -3 (1 cycle = 21 days)
Cmax After Multiple Dose of Alectinib: Phase I		Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (1 cycle = 21 days)
Area Under the Plasma Concentration (AUC) Versus Time Curve Extrapolated to Infinity (AUCinf) After Single Dose of Alectinib: Phase I	AUCinf = AUC from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time. It is obtained from AUC (0- t) plus AUC (t-inf).	Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 24, 32 and 48 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day -3 (1 cycle = 21 days)
AUC From Time Zero to Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) After Multiple Dose of Alectinib: Phase I		Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (1 cycle = 21 days)
Ctrough After Multiple Dose of Alectinib: Phase II		Pre-dose (0 hour) on Day 1 of Cycles 2, Cycle 3, Cycle 4, Cycle 5 (1 cycle = 21 days)
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30): Phase II	EORTC QLQ-C30 included functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), global health status, symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting) and single items (dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation/diarrhea and financial difficulties). Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'; 2 questions used 7-point scale [1 'very poor' to 7 'Excellent']). Scores were averaged and transformed to lie between 0-100 scale; for each of the symptom scales, higher score=better level of functioning, lower score indicates lower level of functioning. 'Baseline' category for any parameter below (e.g. Global health status/QoL [quality of life]) represents absolute data at baseline. QoL=quality of life	Baseline, Weeks 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, 48, 51, 54, 57, 60, 63, 66, 69, 72, 75, 78, 81, 84, 87, 90, 93, 96, 99, 105, 111, 117, last visit (up to 194 weeks)
Change From Baseline in EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer 13 (EORTC QLQ-LC13): Phase II	EORTC QLQ-LC13 consisted of 13 questions for dyspnea (3 items) and 10 single items (cough, hemoptysis, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, pain in chest, pain in arm/shoulder, other pain). Questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'). Scores were averaged and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better level of functioning, lower score indicates lower level of functioning. 'Baseline' category for any parameter below represents absolute data at baseline.	Baseline, Weeks 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, 48, 51, 54, 57, 60, 63, 66, 69, 72, 75, 78, 81, 84, 87, 90, 93, 96, 99, 105, 111, 117, last visit (up to 194 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Hoffmann-La Roche

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Gadgeel S, Shaw AT, Barlesi F, Crino L, Yang JC, Dingemans AM, Kim DW, de Marinis F, Schulz M, Liu S, Gupta R, Smoljanovic V, Ou SI. Time To Response In Patients With Advanced Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK)-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Receiving Alectinib In The Phase II NP28673 And NP28761 Studies. Lung Cancer (Auckl). 2019 Nov 13;10:125-130. doi: 10.2147/LCTT.S209231. eCollection 2019.
• Ou SI, Gadgeel SM, Barlesi F, Yang JC, De Petris L, Kim DW, Govindan R, Dingemans AM, Crino L, Lena H, Popat S, Ahn JS, Dansin E, Mitry E, Muller B, Bordogna W, Balas B, Morcos PN, Shaw AT. Pooled overall survival and safety data from the pivotal phase II studies (NP28673 and NP28761) of alectinib in ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2020 Jan;139:22-27. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.10.015. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
• Morcos PN, Nueesch E, Jaminion F, Guerini E, Hsu JC, Bordogna W, Balas B, Mercier F. Exposure-response analysis of alectinib in crizotinib-resistant ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2018 Jul;82(1):129-138. doi: 10.1007/s00280-018-3597-5. Epub 2018 May 10.
• Gadgeel SM, Shaw AT, Govindan R, Gandhi L, Socinski MA, Camidge DR, De Petris L, Kim DW, Chiappori A, Moro-Sibilot DL, Duruisseaux M, Crino L, De Pas T, Dansin E, Tessmer A, Yang JC, Han JY, Bordogna W, Golding S, Zeaiter A, Ou SI. Pooled Analysis of CNS Response to Alectinib in Two Studies of Pretreated Patients With ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Dec;34(34):4079-4085. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.4639. Epub 2016 Oct 31. Erratum In: J Clin Oncol. 2017 May 10;35(14):1631.
• Lin YT, Yu CJ, Yang JC, Shih JY. Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Kinase Domain Mutation Following ALK Inhibitor(s) Failure in Advanced ALK Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Analysis and Literature Review. Clin Lung Cancer. 2016 Sep;17(5):e77-e94. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
• Shaw AT, Gandhi L, Gadgeel S, Riely GJ, Cetnar J, West H, Camidge DR, Socinski MA, Chiappori A, Mekhail T, Chao BH, Borghaei H, Gold KA, Zeaiter A, Bordogna W, Balas B, Puig O, Henschel V, Ou SI; study investigators. Alectinib in ALK-positive, crizotinib-resistant, non-small-cell lung cancer: a single-group, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Feb;17(2):234-242. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00488-X. Epub 2015 Dec 19. Erratum In: Lancet Oncol. 2017 Mar;18(3):e134.
• Gadgeel SM, Gandhi L, Riely GJ, Chiappori AA, West HL, Azada MC, Morcos PN, Lee RM, Garcia L, Yu L, Boisserie F, Di Laurenzio L, Golding S, Sato J, Yokoyama S, Tanaka T, Ou SH. Safety and activity of alectinib against systemic disease and brain metastases in patients with crizotinib-resistant ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (AF-002JG): results from the dose-finding portion of a phase 1/2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Sep;15(10):1119-28. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70362-6. Epub 2014 Aug 18.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): September 30, 2013
• Primary Completion (Actual): October 24, 2014
• Study Completion (Actual): August 31, 2017

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: May 28, 2013
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: June 4, 2013
• First Posted (Estimate): June 7, 2013

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): August 21, 2018
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 23, 2018
• Last Verified: July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Respiratory Tract Diseases; Neoplasms; Lung Diseases; Neoplasms by Site; Respiratory Tract Neoplasms; Thoracic Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Bronchogenic; Bronchial Neoplasms; Lung Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
• Other Study ID Numbers: NP28761