UroLift System TOlerability and ReCovery When Administering Local Anesthesia (LOCAL)

March 18, 2019 updated by: NeoTract, Inc.

L.O.C.A.L. Study -- UroLift System TOlerability and ReCovery When Administering Local Anesthesia

The purpose of the study is to evaluate procedure tolerability and surgical recovery following the UroLift® system procedure when conducted with local anesthesia in subjects with symptomatic benign hyperplasia (BPH). Primary effectiveness will be achieved by looking at the Quality of Recovery Visual Analog Scale (QoR VAS) by the one month follow-up visit.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The randomized portion of the study is a prospective, multicenter, non-blinded, single arm trial evaluating procedure tolerability and surgical recovery following the UroLift® system procedure when conducted with local anesthesia. All subjects undergo UroLift system treatment and will be followed through 5 years after receiving the investigational device.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

51

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92123
        • Genesis Research LLC
    • Florida
      • Daytona Beach, Florida, United States, 32114
        • Advanced Urology Institute
      • Saint Petersburg, Florida, United States, 33710
        • Pinellas Urology
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21237
        • Chesapeake Urology
    • Nevada
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89144
        • Sheldon J. Freedman, M.D., Ltd.
    • South Carolina
      • Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, United States, 29572
        • Carolina Urologic Research Center
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84124
        • Jean Brown Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males age of 50 years or older diagnosed with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Size, volume,length of prostate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: UroLift® System
Single-arm of qualified subjects receiving UroLift® System intervention.
The NeoTract UroLift System is a medical device approved for sale in the European Union, Australia, and Canada. The UroLift® System is indicated for the treatment of symptoms due to urinary outflow obstruction secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in men 50 years of age or older. During the procedure, an implant is delivered into the prostatic lobe obstructing the urethra and restricting urine flow. The distal end of the device is used to compress the lobe then the implant is delivered to retain the lobe in position, thereby increasing the urethral opening and reducing the fluid obstruction through the prostatic urethra.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Recovery
Time Frame: 1 Month
Primary effectiveness will be achieved when 80% (95% lower confidence limit) of subjects achieve a score of 80 or more on the Quality of Recovery Visual Analog Scale (QoR VAS) by the one month follow-up visit. The VAS scale is 0-100, with 100 being 100% recovery.
1 Month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
IPSS Scores at Baseline and 12 Month Follow-up
Time Frame: 12 Months

The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is an 7 question written screening tool used to screen for, rapidly diagnose, track the symptoms of, and suggest management of the symptoms of the disease benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Lower scores are indicative of less symptoms.

Score Correlation[1] 0-7 Mildly symptomatic 8-19 Moderately symptomatic 20-35 Severely symptomatic

12 Months
IPSS 12 Month Change From Baseline
Time Frame: 12 Months

The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is an 7 question written screening tool used to screen for, rapidly diagnose, track the symptoms of, and suggest management of the symptoms of the disease benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) using a total score from 0 - 35.

The larger number for Change in IPSS Score 12 Month Follow-up from Baseline, demonstrate the improvement in IPSS.

12 Months
IPSS 12 Month Percent (%) Change From Baseline
Time Frame: 12 Months

The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is an 7 question written screening tool used to screen for, rapidly diagnose, track the symptoms of, and suggest management of the symptoms of the disease benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) using a total score from 0 - 35.

The larger Percent (%) Change in IPSS Score at 12 Month Follow-up from Baseline, demonstrates the improvement in IPSS (the mean score was change by X %). Note: Percent (%) Change: is the mean % change of each subject.

12 Months
BPH II Scores at Baseline and 12 Month Follow-up
Time Frame: 12 Month

BPH Impact Index (BPH II) A validated questionnaire to measure how much urinary problems of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia affect domains of health. BPHII total score is the combined (sum) of scores for Questions 1-4 (sum range of 0-13 scoring is presented below) MAX of 13 would be 3,3,3,and 4: A score of zero = Patient experiences no BPH impact and does not add any to score.

Questions 1-4:

  1. Over the past month how much physical discomfort did any urinary problems cause you? &
  2. Over the past month, how much did you worry about your health because of any urinary problems? 0 None, 1, 2, 3 A lot.
  3. Overall, how bothersome has any trouble with urination been during the past month? 0 Not at all bothersome,1,2,3 Bothers me a lot.
  4. Over the past month, how much of the time has any urinary problems kept you from doing the kind of things you would usually do? 0 None of the time, 1,2,3, 4 All of the time.
12 Month
BPH II 12 Month Percent (%) Change From Baseline
Time Frame: 12 Months

BPH Impact Index (BPH II) A validated questionnaire to measure how much urinary problems of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia affect domains of health. BPHII total score is the combined (sum) of scores for Questions 1-4 (sum range of 0-13 scoring is presented below) MAX of 13 would be 3,3,3,and 4: A score of zero = Patient experiences no BPH impact and does not add any to score.

Questions 1-4:

  1. Over the past month how much physical discomfort did any urinary problems cause you? &
  2. Over the past month, how much did you worry about your health because of any urinary problems? 0 None, 1, 2, 3 A lot.
  3. Overall, how bothersome has any trouble with urination been during the past month? 0 Not at all bothersome,1,2,3 Bothers me a lot.
  4. Over the past month, how much of the time has any urinary problems kept you from doing the kind of things you would usually do? 0 None of the time, 1,2,3, 4 All of the time.
12 Months
BPH II 12 Month Change From Baseline
Time Frame: 12 Months

BPH Impact Index (BPH II) A validated questionnaire to measure how much urinary problems of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia affect domains of health. BPHII total score is the combined (sum) of scores for Questions 1-4 (sum range of 0-13 scoring is presented below) MAX of 13 would be 3,3,3,and 4: A score of zero = Patient experiences no BPH impact and does not add any to score.

Questions 1-4:

  1. Over the past month how much physical discomfort did any urinary problems cause you? &
  2. Over the past month, how much did you worry about your health because of any urinary problems? 0 None, 1, 2, 3 A lot.
  3. Overall, how bothersome has any trouble with urination been during the past month? 0 Not at all bothersome,1,2,3 Bothers me a lot.
  4. Over the past month, how much of the time has any urinary problems kept you from doing the kind of things you would usually do? 0 None of the time, 1,2,3, 4 All of the time.
12 Months
Qmax Scores at Baseline and 12 Month Follow-up
Time Frame: 12 Month
QMAX indicates the maximum flow rate during a Uroflow in mL/sec. QMAX is used as an indicator for the diagnosis of enlarged prostate. A lower QMAX may indicate that the enlarged prostate puts pressure on the urethra.
12 Month
QMAX 12 Month Change Minus Baseline
Time Frame: 12 Months
QMAX indicates the maximum flow rate during a Uroflow in mL/sec. QMAX is used as an indicator for the diagnosis of enlarged prostate. A lower QMAX may indicate that the enlarged prostate puts pressure on the urethra. The larger number for Change of the QMAX value at 12 Month Follow-up minus Baseline, demonstrate the improvement in QMAX
12 Months
QMAX 12 Month Percent (%) Change in mL/Sec From Baseline
Time Frame: 12 Months
QMAX indicates the maximum flow rate during a Uroflow in mL/sec. QMAX is used as an indicator for the diagnosis of enlarged prostate. A lower QMAX may indicate that the enlarged prostate puts pressure on the urethra. The larger Percent (%) Change of the QMAX value at 12 Month Follow-up from Baseline, demonstrate the improvement in QMAX. Note: Percent (%) Change: is the average %change of each subject
12 Months
Pain Tolerability Throughout the UroLift System Procedure
Time Frame: 12 Month
Pain Tolerability using questionnaire pelvic pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 0-10. A score of 0 (zero) would equal no pain while a score of 10 would equate to pain as bad as patient could imagine. This scale was assessed at different times during procedure as specified in results section.
12 Month
BPHII Baseline and 12 Month Median Score, 95% CI
Time Frame: 12 Month

BPH Impact Index (BPH II) A validated questionnaire to measure how much urinary problems of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia affect domains of health. BPHII total score is the combined (sum) of scores for Questions 1-4 (sum range of 0-13 scoring is presented below) MAX of 13 would be 3,3,3,and 4: A score of zero = Patient experiences no BPH impact and does not add any to score.

Questions 1-4:

  1. Over the past month how much physical discomfort did any urinary problems cause you? &
  2. Over the past month, how much did you worry about your health because of any urinary problems? 0 None, 1, 2, 3 A lot.
  3. Overall, how bothersome has any trouble with urination been during the past month? 0 Not at all bothersome,1,2,3 Bothers me a lot.
  4. Over the past month, how much of the time has any urinary problems kept you from doing the kind of things you would usually do? 0 None of the time, 1,2,3, 4 All of the time.
12 Month
IPSS at Baseline and 12 Months, Median , 95% CI
Time Frame: 12 Month

The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is an 7 question written screening tool used to screen for, rapidly diagnose, track the symptoms of, and suggest management of the symptoms of the disease benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Lower scores are indicative of less symptoms.

Score Correlation[1] 0-7 Mildly symptomatic 8-19 Moderately symptomatic 20-35 Severely symptomatic

12 Month
QMAX Median at Baseline and 12 Months With CI 95%
Time Frame: 12 Month
QMAX indicates the maximum flow rate during a Uroflow in mL/sec. QMAX is used as an indicator for the diagnosis of enlarged prostate. A lower QMAX may indicate that the enlarged prostate is obstructive.
12 Month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Neal D Shore, MD, Grand Strand Urology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

September 4, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

June 13, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CP12911

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Clinical Trials on UroLift® System

Subscribe