Ambrisentan for Inoperable Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension. (AMBER I)

January 20, 2017 updated by: GlaxoSmithKline

A Randomised, Multicentre, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Of Ambrisentan In Subjects With Inoperable Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (CTEPH).

It is hypothesised that ambrisentan may provide benefit to subjects with inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), where currently no proven or licensed treatment options exist. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind placebo controlled parallel group, 16 week study will compare the safety and efficacy of ambrisentan 5 milligrams (mg) versus placebo in subjects with inoperable CTEPH. The study will enrol 160 subjects, to assure at least 72 evaluable subjects per treatment arm, based on 10% drop-out rate.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

33

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1181ACH
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Corrientes, Argentina, W3400AMZ
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Santa Fe, Argentina
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Santa Fe
      • Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina, S2000ODA
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Graz, Austria, A-8036
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Innsbruck, Austria, A-6020
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Vienna, Austria, 1090
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2G3
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5W9
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Beijing, China, 100020
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Beijing, China, 100037
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Beijing, China, 100038
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Shanghai, China, 200433
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430022
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Shaanxi
      • Xian, Shaanxi, China, 710061
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Praha 2, Czech Republic, 128 08
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Baden-Wuerttemberg
      • Heidelberg, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany, 69126
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Bayern
      • Regensburg, Bayern, Germany, 93053
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Wuerzburg, Bayern, Germany, 97074
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Niedersachsen
      • Hannover, Niedersachsen, Germany, 30625
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Saarland
      • Homburg, Saarland, Germany, 66421
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Sachsen
      • Dresden, Sachsen, Germany, 01307
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Leipzig, Sachsen, Germany, 04103
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Ashkelon, Israel, 78360
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Zrifin, Israel, 70300
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Aichi, Japan, 466-8560
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Fukuoka, Japan, 812-8582
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Hokkaido, Japan, 060-8648
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Hyogo, Japan, 650-0017
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Miyagi, Japan, 980-8574
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Tochigi, Japan, 329-0498
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Tokyo, Japan, 113-8655
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Tokyo, Japan, 181-8611
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 120-752
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 110-744
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 135-710
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Nuevo León
      • Monterrey NL, Nuevo León, Mexico, 64718
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1081 HV
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Kemerovo, Russian Federation, 650002
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Novosibirsk, Russian Federation, 630055
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634012
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08036
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Madrid, Spain, 28041
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Majadahonda (Madrid), Spain, 28222
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Sevilla, Spain, 41013
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB23 3RE
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Clydebank, United Kingdom, G81 4DY
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • London, United Kingdom, NW3 2QH
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02118
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390-8550
        • GSK Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signed written informed consent prior to beginning study-related procedures.
  • Subject must be between 18-80 years of age, inclusive, at the Screening Visit.
  • Subjects must have a diagnosis of CTEPH at an expert centre with a positive V/Q and CT angiogram and a pulmonary angiogram if available within 6 months prior to screening.
  • Subject must meet all of the following haemodynamic criteria by means of a RHC within 3 months prior to screening: Mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) of >25 millimeters of mercury (mmHg), Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) >400 dynes.sec/centimetre (cm)^5, Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) or Left ventricle end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) of <15 mmHg.
  • Subjects must have previously been judged inoperable due to the obstruction being surgically inaccessible (i.e. distal disease) by an expert multidisciplinary team which must include at least one cardiology or respiratory consultant, and one consultant PEA surgeon. For countries with CTEPH expert centers [including at least a surgeon with sound experience performing Pulmonary Endarterectomy (PEAs)] the expert team will be the local expert centre. For countries without a CTEPH surgical expert center a central adjudication committee will assess the operability of the subjects during the screening period.
  • Subject must walk a distance of >150 Meters (m) and < 475 m at the screening visit.
  • Subject must have a current diagnosis of being in WHO Functional Class II or III.
  • Subject, with or without supplemental oxygen, must have a resting arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) > 92% as measured by pulse oximetry at the Screening Visit.
  • Subjects must have received anticoagulation for a minimum of 3 months prior to Screening
  • Female subject of childbearing potential must agree to use 2 reliable methods of contraception from the Screening Visit until study completion and for at least 30 days following the last dose of Investigational Product
  • Subject must agree not to participate in a clinical study involving another investigational drug or device throughout this study.
  • Subject must be competent to understand the information given in the Institutional Review Board (IRB) or Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) approved informed consent form (ICF) and must sign the form prior to the initiation of any study procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject received previous Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) therapy (Phosphodiesterase type 5 [PDE5i], Endothelin receptor antagonist [ERA], chronic prostanoid use)
  • Subject has previously discontinued other ERA in either another clinical study or commercial product for safety or tolerability reasons other than for liver function abnormalities.
  • Subject has a known hypersensitivity to the Investigational Products, the metabolites, or formulation excipients
  • Subject has previously undergone a pulmonary endarterectomy or a balloon pulmonary angioplasty
  • Subject receiving intravenous inotropes within 2 weeks prior to the Screening Visit (e.g. dopamine, dobutamine)
  • Subjects receiving Calcium Channel Blockers or 5-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A 5-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (i.e., statins) on an unstable dose 4 weeks prior to the Screening Visit (to be eligible subjects must not have changed their dose <4 weeks prior to the screening visit)
  • Subject has not enrolled in an exercise training program for cardiopulmonary rehabilitation within 12 weeks prior to the Screening Visit and must agree not to enroll in an exercise training program for pulmonary rehabilitation during the Screening Period and the first 16 weeks of the study. Subjects enrolled in an exercise program for pulmonary rehabilitation 12 weeks prior to screening may enter the study if they agree to maintain their current level of rehabilitation for the first 16 weeks of the study.
  • Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) > 3x Upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • Bilirubin > 1.5xULN (>35% direct bilirubin)
  • Subject has severe renal impairment [estimated creatinine clearance <30 millilitre/minute (mL/min)] at the Screening Visit
  • Subject has moderate - severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class B-C with or without cirrhosis) at the Screening Visit
  • Subject has clinically significant anaemia: Hemoglobin (Hb) < 10 grams/decilitre (g/dL)
  • Subjects with bleeding disorders or significant active peptic ulceration in the opinion of the investigator
  • Subject has uncontrolled hypertension (>180/110 mmHg) at screening
  • Subject has severe hypotension (<90/50 mmHg) at screening
  • Subject has had an acute myocardial infarction within the last 90 days prior to screening
  • Subject has, in the opinion of the investigator, clinically significant aortic or mitral valve disease; pericardial constriction; restrictive or congestive cardiomyopathy; life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias; significant left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction <50% of normal); left ventricular outflow obstruction; symptomatic coronary artery disease; autonomic hypotension; fluid depletion.
  • Subject with significant pulmonary disease Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) <70% of predicted): Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Emphysema, evidence of fibrotic lung disease on imaging
  • Subject has clinically significant fluid retention in the opinion of the investigator
  • Subject with significant obesity [Body mass index (BMI) ≥35], cardiovascular, musculoskeletal or any other condition that in the opinion of the investigator may involve an impairment of exercise capacity or the performance of the 6MWD test (e.g. previous history of hip/knee surgery, lower limb ulcers associated with autoimmune diseases)
  • Subject with cardiovascular, liver, renal, haematologic, gastrointestinal, immunologic, endocrine, metabolic, or central nervous system disease that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may adversely affect the safety of the subject and/or efficacy of the investigational product or severely limit the lifespan of the subject other than the condition being studied
  • Subjects with a prior malignancy whose cancer is expected to require additional active treatment in the next 2 years and whose prior malignancy would prevent them from fully participating in the study
  • Female subject who is pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Subject has demonstrated noncompliance with previous medical regimens
  • Subject has a recent (within 1 year) history of abusing alcohol or illicit drugs
  • Subject has participated in a clinical study involving another investigational drug or device within 4 weeks before the Screening Visit.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ambrisentan
Subjects in this arm will receive ambrisentan 5 mg tablet once daily during the treatment period.
White, film-coated, immediate-release tablets, containing 5 mg ambrisentan for single dose oral.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Subjects in this arm will receive ambrisentan-matching placebo tablet once daily during the treatment period.
White, film-coated, ambrisentan-matching placebo tablet for single oral dose

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Six Minutes Walking Distance (6MWD) at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0); Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16/Early Withdrawal
The 6-minute walk test was conducted according to the American Thoracic Society guidelines in accordance with local standard operating procedures. 6MWD was measured by a 6-minute walk test. This test measures the distance that a participant can walk in a period of 6 minutes. Change from baseline was calculated at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at the specified visit minus the Baseline value. Data at Baseline is based on average of two consecutive test results during Screening/Baseline period that differ by <10%. If only one measurement was available, that measurement was used. In any cases where the protocol-defined criteria for Baseline 6MWD was not met, the Baseline value was based on the last two consecutive measurements for a participant.
Baseline (Week 0); Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16/Early Withdrawal

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR) at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 16
PVR is a measure of cardiopulmonary haemodynamics. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at specified visit minus Baseline value. Baseline is the last value recorded on or prior to start of study treatment.
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 16
Change From Baseline in WHO Functional Class (FC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16/Early Withdrawal
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0); Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16/Early Withdrawal
The WHO FC indicates the severity of PAH and is an adaptation of the New York Heart Association classification. It was assessed by the investigator. There are four grades for WHO FC based on severity of symptoms (Class I = none, Class IV = most severe). This functional classification system links symptoms with activity limitations, and allows clinicians to quickly predict disease progression and prognosis, as well as the need for specific treatment regimens, irrespective of the underlying etiology of PAH. Baseline is the last value recorded on or prior to start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at specified visit minus the Baseline value. For analyse purposes, the WHO FC Class categories of I-IV were mapped to a numeric scale of 1-4.
Baseline (Week 0); Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16/Early Withdrawal
Change From Baseline in Borg CR10 Scale (BCR10S) Immediately Following Exercise at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16/Early Withdrawal
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0); Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16/Early Withdrawal
The BCR10S score was collected immediately following completion of the 6-minute walk test. Baseline data was calculated as the average of the two BCR10S values obtained following the two 6MWD tests used in determining the Baseline 6MWD. If only one measurement was available, that measurement has been used. BCR10S scores ranges from 0 to 10 (0=nothing at all, 10=extremely strong). If participant's perception or feeling was stronger than "10", i.e "extremely strong", "Maximal" - a larger number could be used, e.g. 12 or still higher i.e "Absolute maximum"). Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at specified visit minus the Baseline value.
Baseline (Week 0); Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16/Early Withdrawal
Number of Participants With Clinical Worsening of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (CTEPH)
Time Frame: From randomization to Week 16/Follow up visit (21 weeks)
Clinical worsening of CTEPH is defined by the time from randomization to the first occurrence of death, lung transplantation, hospitalization for CTEPH, atrial septostomy, addition of parenteral prostanoids, or study withdrawal due to two or more early escape criteria included: a decrease from Baseline of at least 20 percent in the distance walked during the six-minute walk test; an increase of one or more WHO functional class; worsening right ventricular failure (e.g., as indicated by increased jugular venous pressure; new/worsening hepatomegaly, ascites, or peripheral edema; worsening echocardiographic parameters such as tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and Tissue Doppler Imaging of the tricuspid annulus); rapidly progressing cardiogenic, hepatic, or renal failure; refractory systolic hypotension (systolic blood pressure less than 85 millimeter of mercury [mmHg]).
From randomization to Week 16/Follow up visit (21 weeks)
Change From Baseline in Mean Right Atrial Pressure (mRAP) and Mean Pulmonary Artery Pressure (mPAP) at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 16
mPAP and mRAP are measures of cardiopulmonary hemodynamics. Baseline is the last value recorded on or prior to start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at specified visit minus the Baseline value.
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Cardiac Index at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 16
Cardiac index is measure of cardiopulmonary hemodynamics. Baseline is the last value recorded on or prior to start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at specified visit minus the Baseline value.
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in Plasma N-terminal Pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP)
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0); Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16/Early Withdrawal
The ratio to baseline [BL] in NT-proBNP was calculated as the ratio of the value at the specified time-point to the BL value and was expressed as a percent change from BL. For each treatment group, the mean change from BL at the specified time-point was determined on the log scale. This mean was then back transformed to give a geometric mean (GM) of the ratio of the value at the specified time-point to BL on the original scale. The GM was expressed as a percentage (100*[GM - 1]). Standard Deviation(SD) is the SD of the mean change from baseline values on the log scale.
Baseline (Week 0); Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16/Early Withdrawal
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Measured by Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Time Frame: Baseline and up to Week 16/Early Withdrawal
The SF-36 v2 is a self-administered, health-related quality of life (QoL) metric. It is a 36-item questionnaire designed to measure 8 domains of functional health status and well-being: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health as well as 2 summary measures (Physical Health and Mental Health). Each domain is scored from 0 (poorer health) to 100 (better health). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score. The SF-36 data were collected, but after the study was terminated, not all endpoints listed in the protocol were analyzed, including the SF-36. This decision was documented in the reporting and analysis plan prior to database lock.
Baseline and up to Week 16/Early Withdrawal
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: From the start of study treatment and until follow up (Week 16/Follow up)
AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. For marketed medicinal products, this also includes failure to produce expected benefits (i.e., lack of efficacy), abuse or misuse. A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or important medical events that may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization but may jeopardize the participant or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in the above definition.
From the start of study treatment and until follow up (Week 16/Follow up)
Change From Baseline in Haemoglobin Levels at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16/Early Withdrawal
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0); Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16/Early Withdrawal
Haemoglobin levels were assessed at Screening, Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16/Early Withdrawal. Baseline is the last value recorded on or prior to start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Baseline (Week 0); Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16/Early Withdrawal
Change From Baseline in Haematocrit Levels at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16/Early Withdrawal
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0); Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16/Early Withdrawal
Haematocrit levels were assessed at Screening, Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16/Early Withdrawal. Baseline is the last value recorded on or prior to start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Baseline (Week 0); Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16/Early Withdrawal
Number of Participants With Significant Liver Events at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16/Early Withdrawal
Time Frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16/Early Withdrawal
A significant liver chemistry result is defined as any result which met the stopping criteria defined in the study protocol. Liver events were assessed at Screening, Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16/Early Withdrawal. Number of participants who reported a significant liver chemistry result are presented.
Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16/Early Withdrawal
Change From Baseline in Supine Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) Assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16/Early Withdrawal
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0); Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16/Early Withdrawal
Vital sign measurements including supine systolic and diastolic blood pressure at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16/Early Withdrawal weeks. Supine blood pressure measurement was taken in a supine position having rested in this position for at least 10 minutes before each reading. Baseline is the last value recorded on or prior to start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Baseline (Week 0); Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16/Early Withdrawal
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate Assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16/Early Withdrawal
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0); Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16/Early Withdrawal
Vital sign measurements including heart rate at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16/Early Withdrawal weeks. Baseline is the last value recorded on or prior to start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Baseline (Week 0); Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16/Early Withdrawal
Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time Post Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16/early withdrawal,
Clinical chemistry parameters including alanine amino transferase (ALT), aspartate amino transferase (AST), creatinine, gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) and total bilirubin (TB) assessed any time post Baseline. ALT: lower concern value and high concern value was considered as none and >=3xupper limit of normal (ULN) respectively. AST: lower concern value and high concern value was considered as none or >=3xULN respectively. creatinine: lower concern value and high concern value was considered as none and >=176.8 micromoles per liter (umol/L) respectively. GGT: lower concern value and high concern value was considered as none and >=3xULN respectively. For TB: lower concern value was none and high concern value was >=2xULN. Participants with both normal and low values were counted once under their worst case (Low). Participants with both normal and high values were counted once under their worst case (High). Participants with both high and low values are counted under both categories.
Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16/early withdrawal,
Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time Post Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16/early withdrawal
Hematology parameters including hemoglobin, international normalized ratio (INR), and platelet count assessed any time post Baseline. Baseline is the last value recorded on or prior to start of study treatment. For hemoglobin: lower concern value and high concern value was considered as <100 gram per liter (G/L) and none respectively. For INR: lower concern value and high concern value was considered as none or >5 prothrombin time respectively. For platelet count: lower concern value and high concern value was considered as <50 giga cells per liter (GI/L) and >500 GI/L respectively. Participants with both normal and low values were counted once under their worst case (Low). Participants with both normal and high values were counted once under their worst case (High). Participants with both high and low values are counted under both categories.
Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16/early withdrawal
Number of Participants With Testicular Function (Males Only) of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time Post Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4 and 16/early withdrawal
For male participants testicular function (total testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin [SHBG-calculated free testosterone), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and inhibin B were assessed at Weeks 4 and 16/early withdrawal. The testicular function data were collected, but after the study was terminated, not all endpoints listed in the protocol were analyzed, including Testicular Function. This decision was documented in the reporting and analysis plan prior to database lock.
Baseline, Weeks 4 and 16/early withdrawal

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 20, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 21, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

June 24, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 6, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertension

Clinical Trials on Ambrisentan 5 mg

Subscribe