Brain and Peripheral Electrical Stimulation in Chronic Low Back Pain: a Factorial Design

December 3, 2014 updated by: University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

Treatment of Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain With Brain and Peripheral Electrical Stimulation: a Factorial, Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of brain and peripheral electrical stimulation on chronic non-specific low back pain patients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

92

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • São Paulo, Brazil, 05360-000
        • School of Physiotherapy - University of São Paulo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males and females aged > 18 years and <65 years
  • Complaining of back pain for more than three months
  • Presence of a chronic pain measurable with the number rating scale (NRS 0-10) not less than 4 during a 1 week daily NRS monitoring
  • Seeking care for low back pain

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous surgery on the spine, spondylolisthesis
  • Previous treatment with TENS <6 months
  • Previous treatment with tDCS
  • Disc herniation with nerve compression
  • Neurological, psychiatric and rheumatologic diseases
  • Impaired sensibility
  • Use of pacemakers or other implanted devices
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: FACTORIAL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: tDCS real + TENS real

Real transcranial direct current stimulation associated with real transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).

tDCS: 20 minutes, 2mA, primary motor cortex anode (contralateral to the lesion) and supraorbital cathode (ipsilateral to the lesion).

TENS: 40 minutes, 100Hz, 200µs, 2 channels with electrodes over the low back area of pain.

Technique based on the application of weak, direct electrical current to the brain through relatively large electrodes that are placed over the scalp, in which anodal and cathodal stimulation increases and decreases cortical excitability, respectively
Technique based on the application of low-voltage electrical current to the skin through relatively large electrodes that are placed over the pain area.
EXPERIMENTAL: tDCS real + TENS sham

Real transcranial direct current stimulation associated with sham transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).

tDCS: 20 minutes, 2mA, primary motor cortex anode (contralateral to the lesion) and supraorbital cathode (ipsilateral to the lesion).

TENS: 40 minutes (30 seconds ON), 100Hz, 200µs, 2 channels with electrodes over the low back area of pain.

Technique based on the application of weak, direct electrical current to the brain through relatively large electrodes that are placed over the scalp, in which anodal and cathodal stimulation increases and decreases cortical excitability, respectively
Technique based on the application of low-voltage electrical current to the skin through relatively large electrodes that are placed over the pain area.
EXPERIMENTAL: tDCS sham + TENS real

Sham transcranial direct current stimulation associated with real transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).

tDCS: 20 minutes (30 seconds ON), 2mA, primary motor cortex anode (contralateral to the lesion) and supraorbital cathode (ipsilateral to the lesion).

TENS: 40 minutes, 100Hz, 200µs, 2 channels with electrodes over the low back area of pain.

Technique based on the application of weak, direct electrical current to the brain through relatively large electrodes that are placed over the scalp, in which anodal and cathodal stimulation increases and decreases cortical excitability, respectively
Technique based on the application of low-voltage electrical current to the skin through relatively large electrodes that are placed over the pain area.
SHAM_COMPARATOR: Sham tDCS + Sham TENS

Sham transcranial direct current stimulation associated with sham transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).

tDCS: 20 minutes (30 seconds ON), 2mA, primary motor cortex anode (contralateral to the lesion) and supraorbital cathode (ipsilateral to the lesion).

TENS: 40 minutes (30 seconds ON), 100Hz, 200µs, 2 channels with electrodes over the low back area of pain.

Technique based on the application of weak, direct electrical current to the brain through relatively large electrodes that are placed over the scalp, in which anodal and cathodal stimulation increases and decreases cortical excitability, respectively
Technique based on the application of low-voltage electrical current to the skin through relatively large electrodes that are placed over the pain area.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity
Time Frame: Four weeks after randomization
Pain intensity will be evaluated by numerical rating scale (0-10).
Four weeks after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disability
Time Frame: 4 weeks, 3 and 6 months after randomization.
The Roland Morris disability questionnaire (RMDQ) is composed of 24 yes or no questions designed to assess disability related to back pain.
4 weeks, 3 and 6 months after randomization.
Quality of pain
Time Frame: 4 weeks, 3 and 6 months after randomization.
The Short form of the McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ) consists of 15 representative words from the sensory and affective categories of the standard long form. The 6 point intensity scale and a VAS are included to provide indices of overall pain intensity.
4 weeks, 3 and 6 months after randomization.
Global perceived effect (GPE)
Time Frame: 4 weeks, 3 and 6 months after randomization.
Global perceived effect is an 11 point scale that ranges from 5 (vastly worse) through 0 (no change) to 5 (completely recovered). For all measures of global perceived effect (at baseline and all follow-ups), participants were asked compared to when this episode first started, how would you describe your back these days. A higher score indicates higher recovery from the condition.
4 weeks, 3 and 6 months after randomization.
Pain intensity
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months after randomization
Pain intensity will be evaluated by numerical rating scale (0-10)
3 and 6 months after randomization

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anxiety
Time Frame: 4 weeks, 3 and 6 months after randomization.
Visual analogue scale (VAS)for anxiety assesses anxiety symptoms that we tracked as possible confounding factor.
4 weeks, 3 and 6 months after randomization.
Depression
Time Frame: 4 weeks, 3 and 6 months after randomization
Beck depression inventory (BDI) for depressive symptoms that we tracked as possible confounding factor.
4 weeks, 3 and 6 months after randomization
Satisfaction with care
Time Frame: 4 weeks after randomization
Satisfaction with care will be measured by the Medrisk Instrument for Measuring Patient Satisfaction with Physiotherapy Care.
4 weeks after randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Fuad A Hazime, PT, University of Sao Paulo
  • Study Chair: Silvia MA João, PT, University of Sao Paulo

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 19, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 5, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 11, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 4, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2014

Last Verified

October 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • tDCSBACKPAIN
  • USaoPauloGH (USaoPauloGH)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

3
Subscribe