Esophageal Fully Covered Metal Stents in Caustic Strictures Study

January 25, 2021 updated by: Boston Scientific Corporation

A Multi-Center, Prospective, Evaluation of the Use of a Fully Covered Metal Stent (FCMS) for the Treatment of Refractory Benign Esophageal Strictures Caused by Caustic Ingestion

The purpose of this study is to establish clinical proof of concept of temporary indwell of the WallFlex™ Esophageal Fully Covered Metal Stent (FCMS) for the treatment of refractory benign esophageal strictures caused by caustic ingestion.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to establish clinical proof of concept of temporary indwell of the WallFlex™ Esophageal Fully Covered Metal Stent (FCMS) for the treatment of refractory benign esophageal strictures caused by caustic ingestion. Also to collect data in support of a hypothesis required to prospectively document the safety and effectiveness of temporary indwell of the WallFlex™ Esophageal Fully Covered Metal Stent (FCMS) compared to repeated Bougie Dilation for the treatment of refractory benign esophageal strictures caused by caustic ingestion.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Chandigarh, India, 160012
        • Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
      • Hyderabad, India, 500082
        • Asian institute of Gastroenterology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Availability of medical history pertaining to dysphagia score prior to and during the preceding SECSER.
  2. Availability of patient history pertaining to weight prior to and at completion of SECSER.
  3. Benign esophageal stricture caused by caustic ingestion 12 or more weeks prior to enrollment.
  4. Single esophageal stricture or multiple esophageal stricture over a length < 6 cm.
  5. Having completed the SECSER consisting of 3 dilations intended to reach 15 mm each, separated by 2 weeks, followed by 3 dilations intended to reach 15 mm each with steroid injections, separated by 2 weeks. The dilations may be performed using Bougie or balloon dilation at the discretion of the investigator.
  6. Refractory stricture defined as recurrence of stricture with associated dysphagia within 6 months after completion of SECSER.
  7. Dysphagia score of 2 (ability to swallow semi-solid foods), 3 (ability to swallow liquids only) or 4 (unable to swallow liquids) at baseline.
  8. Unable to pass a standard endoscope (approximately 9.8 mm diameter).
  9. Age 18 years or older.
  10. Willing and able to comply with the study procedures and provide written informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Stricture within 2 cm of the upper esophageal sphincter.
  2. Concomitant Esophageal ulcerations.
  3. Prior esophageal stent placements.
  4. Concurrent gastric and/or duodenal obstruction.
  5. Patients with prior full or partial gastrectomy.
  6. Sensitivity to any components of the stent or delivery system.
  7. Concurrent medical condition that would affect the investigator's ability to evaluate the patient's condition or could compromise patient safety.
  8. Participation in a clinical trial evaluating an investigational device within 3 months prior to enrollment in this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Metal Stent
The WallFlex™ Esophageal Fully Covered Metal Stent (FCMS)is being evaluated for the treatment of refractory benign esophageal strictures caused by caustic ingestion.
Other Names:
  • WallFlex™ Esophageal RX Fully Covered Stent

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Success
Time Frame: From stent placement on day 0 to 6 months after stent removal
Clinical success consisting of stent tolerability and adequate ability to sustain nutrition to 6 months after stent removal. Stent tolerability defined as absence of pain-related stent removal. Adequate ability to sustain nutrition defined as absence of dysphagia-related reintervention.
From stent placement on day 0 to 6 months after stent removal

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stent Placement Success
Time Frame: Stent placement on Day 0
Number of participants with successful stent placement. Successful stent placement defined as the ability to deploy the stent in satisfactory position across the stricture
Stent placement on Day 0
Stent Removal Success
Time Frame: Stent removal at Week 8 (±7 days)
Number of participants with successful stent removal. Successful stent removal defined as the ability to remove the stent endoscopically without serious stent removal related complications.
Stent removal at Week 8 (±7 days)
Change in Patient's Report on Pain Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: From baseline to stent removal at Week 8 (±7 days)

Change in Patient's report on pain compared to Baseline at Day 2, Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, and Thereafter every 2 weeks until stent removal at Week 8. Pain is reported on the VAS Pain Score scale from 0 (0 being No Pain) to 10 (10 being Worst Pain Ever). Higher score means a worse outcome.

If reporting a score on a scale, please include the unabbreviated scale title, the minimum and maximum values, and whether higher scores mean a better or worse outcome.

From baseline to stent removal at Week 8 (±7 days)
Change of Pain Medication Intake From Baseline
Time Frame: From baseline to stent removal at Week 8 (±7 days)
Change of pain medication intake from baseline at Day2, Week1, Week2, and thereafter every 2 weeks until stent removal
From baseline to stent removal at Week 8 (±7 days)
Change in Dysphagia Score Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: From stent placement on day 0 to end of study at Week 32.

Change in dysphagia score compared to Baseline at Day 2, Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, and thereafter every 2 weeks until end of study at Week 32. Change value was calculated as dysphagia score measured during stent treatment minus dysphagia score at Baseline.

Dysphagia is reported using Dysphagia Scoring System (see scoring system below) with higher score meaning a worse outcome.

0 = ability to eat a normal diet

  1. = ability to eat some solids
  2. = ability to eat some semisolids only
  3. = ability to swallow liquids only
  4. = complete dysphagia
From stent placement on day 0 to end of study at Week 32.
Dysphagia Score During Stent Treatment Compared to Score During Proceeding Standardized Esophageal Caustic Stricture Endoscopic Treatment Regimen (SECSER)
Time Frame: Dysphagia score at SECSER was measured prior to baseline. Dysphagia score during stent treatment was measured from stent placement on day 0 to end of study at Week 32

Change in Dysphagia score during stent treatment compared to dysphagia score during proceeding standardized esophageal caustic stricture endoscopic treatment regimen (SECSER). Change value was calculated as dysphagia score during stent treatment (Day 2, Week 1, Week 2, and thereafter every 2 weeks until end of study at Week 32 minus dysphagia score at SECSER.

Dysphagia is reported using Dysphagia Scoring System (see scoring system below) with higher score meaning a worse outcome.

0. = ability to eat a normal diet

  1. = ability to eat some solids
  2. = ability to eat some semisolids only
  3. = ability to swallow liquids only
  4. = complete dysphagia
Dysphagia score at SECSER was measured prior to baseline. Dysphagia score during stent treatment was measured from stent placement on day 0 to end of study at Week 32
Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: From stent placement on Day 0 to end of study at Week 32
Change in overall Quality of Life (QOL) health score compared to Baseline at Day 2, Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, and thereafter every 2 weeks until end of study at Week 32. QOL Overall Health Score is measured on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 meaning the worst health you can imagine and 100 meaning the best health you can imagine. Higher score means a better outcome.
From stent placement on Day 0 to end of study at Week 32
Occurrence of Adverse Events
Time Frame: From stent placement on Day 0 to end of study at Week 32.
Occurrence of Adverse Events Related to the Stent and/or the Stent Placement or Stent Removal Procedure and of All Serious Adverse Events Throughout the Duration of the Study
From stent placement on Day 0 to end of study at Week 32.
Time to Recurrence of Stricture
Time Frame: From stent placement on Day 0 to end of study at Week 32.
Time to Recurrence of Stricture, Defined as Inability of a Normal Diameter Gastroscope (9.8 mm) to Pass the Stricture
From stent placement on Day 0 to end of study at Week 32.
Number of Stent Migration With or Without Related Adverse Events
Time Frame: From stent placement on Day 0 to end of study at Week 32.
Number of stent migration with or without Related adverse events (AE). Stent migration is defined as any proximal or distal migration of stent.
From stent placement on Day 0 to end of study at Week 32.
Change in Patient Weight Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: From stent placement on Day 0 to end of study at Week 32.
Change in Patient Weight Compared to Baseline: Day 2, Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, and Thereafter Every 2 Weeks Until End of Study at Week 32. Positive value means increase in weight and negative value means decrease in weight.
From stent placement on Day 0 to end of study at Week 32.
Change in Patient Weight During Stent Treatment Compared to Weight Gain During Preceding SECSER
Time Frame: From stent placement on Day 0 to end of study at Week 32.
Change in patient weight during stent treatment (day 2, week 1, week 2, week 4, week 6, week 8, and thereafter every 2 weeks until end of study at week 32) compared to preceding standardized esophageal caustic stricture endoscopic treatment regimen (SECSER). Positive value means increase in weight and negative value means decrease in weight.
From stent placement on Day 0 to end of study at Week 32.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 28, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

July 15, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metal Stent (WallFlex™ Esophageal RX)

3
Subscribe