Sorafenib vs.TransArterial Chemoembolization Plus RadioTherapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Macrovascular Invasion (START)

September 15, 2017 updated by: Young-Suk Lim, Asan Medical Center

Randomized Trial Comparing Sorafenib and Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus External Beam Radiotherapy in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Showing Macroscopic Vascular Invasion

To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of sorafenib versus trans-arterial chemoembolization plus external beam radiation therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma invading major intrahepatic vessels

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Current practice guidelines recommend only sorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma invading major intrahepatic vessels. However, recent data from observational studies suggest that the combination of transarterial chemoembolization and external beam radiotherapy would be as effective as sorafenib.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >19 years
  • Child-Pugh class A liver function
  • Performance status: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score 0 or 1
  • Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) confirmed by dynamic CT or MRI, or by biopsy
  • HCC invasion of first or second branch portal vein or hepatic vein or inferior vena cava
  • Reserved unilateral portal blood flow at least in partial
  • HCC size larger than 1 cm and less than 50% of total liver volume
  • No confirmed extrahepatic metastasis
  • Adequate hematopoietic function Hemoglobin ≥ 8.5 g/dL Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 750/mm3 Platelet count ≥ 30,000/mm3
  • Creatinine < 1.5mg/dL
  • No plan for pregnancy or breast feeding. Active contraception.
  • Willing to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior history to or exposure of transarterial chemoembolization, external beam radiation to liver, or sorafenib
  • Complete obstruction of hepatic outflow
  • Confirmed extrahepatic metastasis of HCC
  • HCC occupying more than 50% of liver volume
  • Uncontrolled ascites of hepatic encephalopathy
  • Prior liver transplantation
  • Positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
  • Active gastric or duodenal ulcer
  • Other uncontrolled comorbidities or malignancy
  • Inability to give informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Sorafenib
Sorafenib 800 mg/day orally
Sorafenib 800 mg/day orally
Other Names:
  • Nexavar
Experimental: TACE+External beam RT
Transarterial chemoembolization plus external beam radiation therapy
Trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) every 6 weeks + external beam radiation therapy starting within 3 weeks after first TACE

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-free survival (PFS) rate
Time Frame: at 12 weeks after randomization
Progression is defined as progressive disease (PD) by independent radiologic review according to RECIST criteria (version 1.1), termination of the assigned treatment, or death from any cause, assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test for treatment comparisons with the intention-to-treat principle.
at 12 weeks after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-free survival (PFS) rate
Time Frame: at 24 weeks and up to 4 years after randomization
Progression is defined as progressive disease (PD) by independent radiologic review according to RECIST criteria (version 1.1), termination of the assigned treatment, or death from any cause, assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test for treatment comparisons.
at 24 weeks and up to 4 years after randomization
Radiologic response rate
Time Frame: at 12 and 24 weeks after randomization
Radiologic response rate by independent radiologic review according to RECIST criteria (version 1.1), , assessed by Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate.
at 12 and 24 weeks after randomization
treatment-crossover rate
Time Frame: at 12 and 24 weeks after randomization
Crossover of treatment is permitted after confirming the disease progression during the initially assigned treatment, assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test for treatment comparisons.
at 12 and 24 weeks after randomization
time to progression
Time Frame: up to 4 years after randomization
The median time to progression assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test for treatment comparisons.
up to 4 years after randomization
Overall patient survival rate
Time Frame: up to 4 years after randomization
The median overall patient survival rate assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test for treatment comparisons.
up to 4 years after randomization
Exploratory analysis for overall patient survival rate
Time Frame: up to 4 years after randomization
By using Cox proportional hazards model to evaluate the interaction between important baseline characteristics and the effect of treatments on overall survival.
up to 4 years after randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Young-Suk Lim, MD, PhD, Asan Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 29, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 20, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 14, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

July 17, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 18, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2017

Last Verified

September 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Sorafenib

Subscribe