An Efficacy And Safety Study of CNTO 6785 In Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Methotrexate Therapy

February 3, 2016 updated by: Janssen Research & Development, LLC

A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Double-blind, Multicenter, Phase 2 Dose Ranging Study To Assess The Efficacy And Safety of CNTO 6785 In Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Methotrexate Therapy

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of CNTO6785 in participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite methotrexate (MTX) therapy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a randomized (participants are assigned to treatment by chance), double-blind (participants and study personnel will not know which treatments are being given), placebo-controlled (a placebo appears identical to a study drug but has no active ingredients), multicenter study. The study will consist of 3 phases: a screening phase, a treatment phase, and a follow-up phase. Approximately 250 participants with active RA despite MTX therapy will be randomly assigned to receive placebo or CNTO 6785 during the double-blind treatment phase. The maximum period of active treatment will be 28 weeks. The maximum duration of study participation will be 44 weeks. Participant safety will be monitored throughout the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

257

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Buenos Aires, Argentina
      • Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Argentina
      • Cordoba, Argentina
      • La Capital, Argentina
      • San Juan, Argentina
      • Barranquilla, Colombia
      • Bogota, Colombia
      • Medellín, Colombia
      • Jihlava, Czech Republic
      • Praha, Czech Republic
      • Praha 5, Czech Republic
      • Cebu, Philippines
      • Iloilo City, Philippines
      • Lipa City, Philippines
      • Quezon City, Philippines
      • Bydgoszcz, Poland
      • Grodzisk Mazowiecki, Poland
      • Lodz, Poland
      • Lublin, Poland
      • Poznan, Poland
      • Warszawa, Poland
      • Wroclaw, Poland
      • Barnaul, Russian Federation
      • Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation
      • Kemerovo, Russian Federation
      • Kursk, Russian Federation
      • Moscow, Russian Federation
      • Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
      • Petrozavodsk, Russian Federation
      • Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
      • St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
      • Yaroslavl, Russian Federation
      • Bangkok, Thailand
      • Chiang Mai, Thailand

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (according to the revised 1987 criteria of the American Rheumatism Association) and have had RA for at least 6 months prior to the date of signing the informed consent at screening
  • Have active RA defined study as persistent disease activity with both of the following criteria: at least 6 swollen and 6 tender joints using a 66/68 joint count at the time of screening and at baseline; and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 0.8 mg/dL at screening or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) ≥ 28 mm in the first hour at screening or baseline
  • Have been treated with and tolerated methotrexate (MTX) treatment at dosages from 7.5 to 25 mg/week, inclusive, for a minimum of 6 months prior to screening and must have a stable MTX dose for a minimum of 6 weeks prior to the first dosing with study agent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has inflammatory diseases other than RA, that might confound the evaluation of the benefit of study agent therapy
  • Has a diagnosis of fibromyalgia
  • Has a recent history (within 12 months prior to screening) of uncontrolled, chronic disease including, but not limited to, pulmonary, psychiatric, and metabolic disturbances, cardiovascular, endocrine, neurological, hepatic, gastrointestinal, renal, hematological, or urological diseases that the investigator believes are clinically significant
  • At screening, the results of laboratory tests must meet protocol-specified criteria
  • Has ever received any approved or investigational biologic agent for a rheumatic indication

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo/CNTO 6785 200 mg+Methotrexate (MTX)
Placebo subcutaneous injections (SC) every 4 weeks through Week 12
CNTO 6785 200 mg SC every 4 weeks from Week 16 through Week 28
CNTO 6785 200 mg SC every 4 weeks through Week 28
MTX at the same stable dose through Week 32, that participants were receiving prior to screening.
Experimental: CNTO 6785 200 mg+MTX
CNTO 6785 200 mg SC every 4 weeks from Week 16 through Week 28
CNTO 6785 200 mg SC every 4 weeks through Week 28
MTX at the same stable dose through Week 32, that participants were receiving prior to screening.
Experimental: CNTO 6785 100 mg+MTX
MTX at the same stable dose through Week 32, that participants were receiving prior to screening.
CNTO 6785 100 mg SC every 4 weeks through Week 28
Experimental: CNTO 6785 50 mg+MTX
MTX at the same stable dose through Week 32, that participants were receiving prior to screening.
CNTO 6785 50 mg SC every 4 weeks through Week 28
Experimental: CNTO 6785 15 mg+MTX
MTX at the same stable dose through Week 32, that participants were receiving prior to screening.
CNTO 6785 15 mg SC every 4 weeks through Week 28

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The proportion of participants who achieve an ACR 20 response at Week 16
Time Frame: Week 16
American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 response is a >=20% improvement in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) symptoms.
Week 16

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in DAS28 (CRP) at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
DAS28 (using CRP [C-reactive protein]) is a measure of tender and swollen joints and the patient's assessment of disease activity.
Baseline to Week 16
The proportion of participants who achieve ACR 50 response at Week 16
Time Frame: Week 16
American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 response is a >=50% improvement in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) symptoms.
Week 16
The proportion of participants who achieve ACR 20 response through Week 32
Time Frame: Week 32
Week 32
The proportion of participants who achieve ACR 50 response through Week 32
Time Frame: Week 32
Week 32
The proportion of participants who achieve ACR 70 response through Week 32
Time Frame: Week 32
American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 70 response is a >=70% improvement in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) symptoms.
Week 32
Change from baseline of DAS28 (CRP) through Week 32
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 32
Baseline to Week 32
The proportion of participants with DAS28 (CRP) response through Week 32
Time Frame: Week 32
DAS28 (using CRP [C-reactive protein]) response is improvement from baseline, with >1.2 indicating a good or moderate response and <=0.6 indicating no response.
Week 32
The proportion of participants with DAS28 (CRP) remission at Week 16
Time Frame: Week 16
DAS28 (using CRP [C-reactive protein]) remission is defined as a value of <2.6 on the Disease Activity Index, a measure of tender and swollen joints and the patient's assessment of disease activity.
Week 16
The proportion of participants with DAS28 (CRP) remission at Week 32
Time Frame: Week 32
Week 32
Change from baseline in DAS28 (ESR) at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
DAS28 (using erythrocyte sedimentation rate) is a measure of tender and swollen joints and the patient's assessment of disease activity.
Baseline to Week 16
Change from baseline in DAS28 (ESR) at Week 32
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 32
Baseline to Week 32
Change from baseline in HAQ-DI score through Week 32
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 32
The Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas, each scored from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (inability to perform a task).
Baseline to Week 32
Change from baseline in SF-36 at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
The SF-36 is a medical outcome study health measure and consists of 8 multi-item scales that are scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health.
Baseline to Week 16
Change from baseline in SF-36 at Week 32
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 32
Baseline to Week 32
Change from baseline in CDAI at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score is a derived score combining tender joints (28 joints), swollen joints (28 joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, and Physician's Global Assessments of Disease Activity.
Baseline to Week 16
Change from baseline in CDAI at Week 32
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 32
Baseline to Week 32
Change from baseline in SDAI at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
The Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) score is a derived score combining tender joints (28 joints), swollen joints (28 joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Physician's Global Assessments of Disease Activity, and CRP.
Baseline to Week 16
Change from baseline in SDAI at Week 32
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 32
Baseline to Week 32
The proportion of participants with SDAI-based ACR/EULAR remission at Week 16
Time Frame: Week 16
The Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)-based ACR/EULAR (European League Against Rheumatism) remission is defined as a SDAI value of <=3.3 at a visit.
Week 16
The proportion of participants with SDAI-based ACR/EULAR remission at Week 32
Time Frame: Week 32
Week 32
The proportion of participants with Boolean-based ACR/EULAR remission at Week 16
Time Frame: Week 16
Boolean-based ACR/EULAR remission is achieved if all of the following 4 criteria at that visit are met: tender joint count (68 joints) <=1; swollen joint count (66 joints) <=1; CRP <=1 mg/dL; and Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity on VAS <=1 on a 0 to 10 scale.
Week 16
The proportion of participants with Boolean-based ACR/EULAR remission at Week 32
Time Frame: Week 32
Week 32

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 10, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

July 26, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 2, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2016

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe