Direct Thrombin Inhibitors Versus LMWH in Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteraemia

July 11, 2016 updated by: Peter Verhamme, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Direct Thrombin Inhibitors Versus LMWH in Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteraemia. A Prospective Randomized Controlled Academic Single-centre Feasibility Study.

Safety and efficacy of direct thrombin inhibitors versus enoxaparin in patients with staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia.

The study hypothesizes that inhibition of the coagulase-activity of S. aureus by direct thrombin inhibitors is safe and translates into a better outcome of patients with S. aureus bacteremia.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Single center randomized controlled trial of direct thrombin inhibitors versus standard enoxaparin.

  • Feasibility: proportion of patients eligible for randomization; clinically attained concentration of DTI and resulting staphylothrombin inhibition
  • Safety: bleeding events (major/ clinically relevant non-major)
  • Efficacy: thrombotic events during the thromboprophylactic treatment + 3 days
  • Secondary outcome measures

    • Coagulation parameters: evolution of D-dimers from day 0-4; other lab parameters of coagulation (PT/APTT/fibrinogen/platelet count)
    • Inflammatory parameters: CRP, white blood cell count, neutrophilia
    • Clinical outcomes: metastatic infections, assessed clinically or by PET/CT; relapse of S. aureus bacteremia; defervescence; persistent positive blood cultures; hospital stay, mortality.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

94

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
        • KUleuven/UZ Gasthuisberg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Positive blood culture for staphylococcus aureus
  • Symptoms or signs of infection
  • Indication for thromboprophylaxis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication for thromboprophylaxis
  • Significant active bleeding or risk of excessive bleeding
  • Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
  • Severe liver and kidney disease
  • Pregnancy and lactation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: direct thrombin inhibition
dabigatran 110 mg BID, po argatroban (0.5 - 1 µg/kg/min) if peroral therapy is not possible
Other Names:
  • dabigatran
  • argatroban
Active Comparator: enoxaparin
enoxaparin 40 mg od, sc
Other Names:
  • clexane

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Primary Safety Outcome is the occurence of clinically-relevant bleeding events
Time Frame: From date of randomization up to end of study drug + 3 days
From date of randomization up to end of study drug + 3 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The primary efficacy outcome is the occurence of metastatic infection
Time Frame: From randomization until month 3
as documented with a PET-CTscan in eligible patients on D7-10 or clinically-overt metastatic infectious foci
From randomization until month 3

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Laboratory markers of coagulation
Time Frame: From randomization until D7-10
D-dimeren, fibrinogen, APTT, PT dabigatran level or antiXa
From randomization until D7-10
Laboratory markers of inflammation
Time Frame: From randomization until D7-10
CRP
From randomization until D7-10
Clinical outcomes after S. aureus bacteremia
Time Frame: From randomization until M3
From randomization until M3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Peter Verhamme, Doctor, Bloedings-en vaatziekten, UZ Gasthuisberg

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 14, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

July 30, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 13, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2016

Last Verified

July 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteraemia

Clinical Trials on enoxaparin

Subscribe