Controlled Trial of Tele-Support and Education for Womens Health Care in CBOCs (WH CREATE P4)

November 1, 2019 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development
VA community-based outpatient clinics (CBOCs) typically serve only a small number of women Veterans, and generally do not have the women's health care resources that are available in larger settings. Women Veterans using these sites for primary care must sometimes travel to other sites to receive women's health care. That can create travel burdens, reduce continuity of care, and negatively affect patient outcomes. To address this, VA is implementing a clinical operations innovation that supports women's primary care providers with a technology-based intervention that combines interactive communication with women's health specialists and ongoing education. This research study is evaluating the implementation and effects of this women's healthcare delivery innovation. Findings from this research will inform VA women's health clinical practice and education, and will advance science in delivering technology-supported non-face-to-face care that is applicable to other clinical conditions and patient populations.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Project Background/Rationale: Women Veterans are a rapidly growing proportion of VA patients. While entitled to receive care equivalent to their male counterparts, women Veterans may receive lower quality care, in part due to a VA primary care (PC) workforce that has limited experience caring for women, particularly their gender-specific conditions. This workforce may be especially challenged in community-based outpatient clinics (CBOCs), where access to women's health (WH) expertise may not be readily available. CBOC PC providers (PCPs) typically have small caseloads of women Veterans, making it difficult for these providers to maintain their WH knowledge and skills. To ensure quality care for women Veterans, VA mandated designated WH providers (DWHPs) in every VA facility, and instituted intensive training opportunities-"WH mini-residencies"-for these providers. Although highly valuable in delivering a standard level of specialized WH training, these one-time trainings are not sufficient, as knowledge attenuates over time. Serial education re-enforcement over time is needed to produce and maintain long-term gains in knowledge. Furthermore, additional supports, such as enhanced communication between PCPs and specialists, are necessary to achieve and sustain quality gains. To address these issues, VA is implementing a clinical operations innovation that is designed to improve CBOC-based DWHP delivery of comprehensive WH care. This innovation (entitled DWHP Support) combines: 1) advanced WH serial patient-based education that exposes DWHPs, over time, to a depth and breadth of WH cases and issues (SCAN-ECHO); and 2) interactive communication between CBOC DWHPs and VA Medical Center-based specialists for "just in time" support of DWHP WH care (electronic consultations). The intervention is technology-supported and delivered virtually. It is being implemented in a stepwise manner.

Objectives: Facilitators and barriers to use of DWHP Support, and its effect on patient management are unknown. The investigators hypothesize that DWHP Support will improve the quality and efficiency of WH care in CBOCs. The specific aims are:

Aim #1: To evaluate the effect of DWHP Support on WH care quality and efficiency, using a modified stepped wedge design; Aim #2: To explore the impact of DWHP Support in changing DWHP behavior and self-rated WH knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy; Aim #3: To assess attitudes about DWHP Support and its use, specialist time for its implementation, and other features that could influence DWHP Support's effectiveness, sustainability and spread; Aim #4: To develop tools to measure quality of WH care in VA.

Methods: The investigators will conduct an observational study of DWHP Support for CBOC DWHPs. The investigators will use a mixed methods analytic approach (combining a modified stepped wedge quantitative analysis with provider surveys and interviews) to measure the intervention's effect after 1 year, while also evaluating the implementation process and use of the intervention. The investigators will use quality assessment methods to translate existing evidence-based WH performance guidelines into quality measurement tools applicable to VA WH care.

Anticipated Impact: This proposal aims to evaluate an innovation to improve WH care in CBOCs that uses a technology-based educational and interactive communication intervention designed for WH providers. To measure the intervention's effectiveness, this project will develop WH quality measures that will be valuable tools for other VA efforts to improve WH care. The findings on effectiveness and implementation could influence VA's approach and use of technology-supported interventions for other clinical conditions and in other special populations.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

202

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • West Los Angeles, California, United States, 90073
        • VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West Los Angeles, CA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

VA Women's Health primary care provider in who participates in VA SCAN-ECHO learning sessions or uses VA gynecology electronic consults.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

US Department of Veterans Affairs Women's Health primary care provider in who participates in Veterans Affairs SCAN-ECHO learning sessions or uses Veterans Affairs gynecology electronic consults.

Exclusion Criteria:

none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Stepped wedge participants

Designated Women's Health Providers with one or more episodes of care for women patients during each period of the intervention.

Designated Women's Health Provider: Primary care provider who are proficient in women's health, and should have a minimum of 10% of their patient panels being comprised by women.

Technology-based intervention that combines interactive communication with women's health specialists and ongoing education
Other Names:
  • "DWHP Support"
Electronic consultation survey participants

Designated Women's Health Providers who completed surveys about use of electronic consultations.

Designated Women's Health Provider: Primary care provider who are proficient in women's health, and should have a minimum of 10% of their patient panels being comprised by women.

Technology-based intervention that combines interactive communication with women's health specialists and ongoing education
Other Names:
  • "DWHP Support"
Quality assessment participants
Primary care providers delivering women's health care for one or more of the following conditions: abnormal uterine bleeding; menopausal symptoms; urinary incontinence.
Technology-based intervention that combines interactive communication with women's health specialists and ongoing education
Other Names:
  • "DWHP Support"

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Quality of Women's Health Care (Control Period vs. Intervention Period)
Time Frame: Baseline through four months after the final time step when participants entered into the intervention (28 months)
Quality of care as defined by adherence to practice guidelines. This measure is the difference in the percent of applicable quality indicators for whom the guideline adherent action was performed by primary care providers at baseline versus after entering into the intervention.
Baseline through four months after the final time step when participants entered into the intervention (28 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Quality of Women's Health Care (Controlled Trial Steps)
Time Frame: Baseline through four months after the final time step when participants entered into the intervention (28 months)
Quality of care as defined by adherence to practice guidelines. This measure is the difference in the percent of applicable quality indicators for whom the guideline adherent action was performed by primary care providers, with each subsequent step, over the course of the controlled trial.
Baseline through four months after the final time step when participants entered into the intervention (28 months)
Provider Referral Behavior
Time Frame: 1-7 days after receiving a response to the electronic consult
This measure is the number of providers that changed their referral plan for an in-person specialist-to-patient visit after an electronic consultation.
1-7 days after receiving a response to the electronic consult
Quality of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding Care
Time Frame: 28-month study timeframe
Quality of abnormal uterine bleeding care as defined by adherence to practice guidelines. This measure is the mean percent of applicable quality indicators for whom the guideline adherent action was performed by primary care providers.
28-month study timeframe
Quality of Menopausal Symptoms Care
Time Frame: 28-month study timeframe
Quality of menopausal symptoms care as defined by adherence to practice guidelines. This measure is the mean percent of applicable quality indicators for whom the guideline adherent action was performed by primary care providers.
28-month study timeframe
Quality of Urinary Incontinence Care
Time Frame: 28-month study timeframe
Quality of urinary incontinence care as defined by adherence to practice guidelines. This measure is the mean percent of applicable quality indicators for whom the guideline adherent action was performed by primary care providers.
28-month study timeframe

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Donna L Washington, MD MPH, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West Los Angeles, CA

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 16, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

August 7, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 4, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urinary Incontinence

Clinical Trials on Clinical innovation

Subscribe