Comparison of Extensible and Inextensible Lumbosacral Orthoses for Lower Back Pain (LSO LBP)

April 13, 2015 updated by: David Morrisette, Medical University of South Carolina

Comparison of Inextensible and Extensible Lumbosacral Orthoses for the Management of Episodes of Lower Back Pain

This study is designed to discern if the use of a lumbosacral orthesis (LSO, also call a back support) improves the short-term outcome of lower back pain. participants will receive standard care (physical therapy, physician treatment), with one group also receiving an extensible LSO, and another group receiving an inextensible LSO. The inextensible LSO has been shown to increase stiffness of the trunk in individuals while wearing it. The hypothesis is that the group wearing the inextensible LSO will have improved outcomes over the other two groups (standard care or standard care plus the extensible LSO).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

98

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Medical University of South Carolina

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • chief complaint of lower back pain, with or without lower extremity (LE) symptoms
  • 150 subjects will be recruited from patients seeking treatment for lower back pain from spine specialty orthopaedic clinics, family practice physicians, and out-patient physical therapy clinics

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria are:
  • previous spinal surgery
  • workman's compensation or litigation is involved
  • neurological disease or injury
  • systemic inflammatory disease
  • pulmonary disease which restricts breathing capacity
  • current pregnancy
  • acute fracture
  • tumor or metastatic disease
  • infection
  • neurological disease
  • the presence of pathological reflexes (e.g., Babinski)
  • the presence of lower extremity pain upon cervical motion and / or the presence of two or more of the following signs of nerve compression: diminished lower extremity strength in a myotomal distribution, diminished sensation, and / or absence deep tendon reflexes.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Standard of Care
Medication based on physician prescriptions or overcounter use not germane to the study. Subjects also receive physical therapy for 2 weeks.
Physician visit, physician advice, medications as determined by physician, over the counter medications, and physical therapy.
Experimental: Extensible lumbosacral orthoses plus standard of care
This group receives a flexible/extensible lumbosacral orthosis, one that is commonly available over the counter
Back support is constructed from lycra and neoprene with velcro fasteners.
Experimental: Inextensible lumbosacral orthoses and standard of care
This group receives an inextensible lumbosacral orthoses which leads to 14% increase in trunk stiffness compared to the other conditions.
Cotton/nylon canvas back support with velcro fasteners.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change Score in the Self-assessment of Disability as Measured by Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 weeks
Change score from baseline and the score at the second week. The Oswestry Disabilty Index is a 100 point self-assessment of disabilty due to lower back pain or complications from lower back pain. A score of 40 or more points is interpreted as signficant disability due to lower back pain. A score between 20 and 40 respresents disability, but the individual is still able to function to some degree with activities of daily living, but has to modify their behavior. A score less than 20 implies that the disabilty due to the lower back pain is not greatly impacting a wide range of functions. Compare score change to the minimal clinically important difference between the baseline and the 2nd week score, and the difference in the change scores across the 3 groups.
Baseline and 2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change Score in the Patient Specific Activity Scale
Time Frame: Baseline and 2-weeks
Change score from baseline and the score at the second week. Compare score change to the minimal clinically important difference and analyze for statistical significance between the baseline and the 2nd week score, and the statistical difference in the change scores across the 3 groups. Scores from 0 to 10 with a higher score representing higher function and a lower score representing a decrease function.
Baseline and 2-weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David Morrisette, PT, PhD, Medical Unversity of South Carolina

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

September 2, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 30, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2015

Last Verified

April 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Standard of Care

Subscribe