Comparision of Blood Pressure Variability Between Amlodipine and Losartan

May 11, 2017 updated by: Byung-Su Yoo, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital

The COMPAriSon of Systolic Blood Pressure Variability and Central Blood Pressure of Calcium Channel Blocker (Amlodipine) in Comparison With Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (Losartan) in Patients With Essential Hypertension

Blood pressure (BP) is believed to be a major determinant of vascular disease, and BP lowering is the most important goal in hypertension treatment. Thus, clinical guidelines for hypertension are mainly focused on lowering mean BP. However, despite an increasing incidence of stroke with age, the association between systolic BP (SBP) and the risk of stroke decreases with age. This disparity highlights a gap in the link between BP and vascular-related diseases (i.e., stroke). In clinical practice, visit-to-visit fluctuations in BP have been largely ignored and are thought to be an unreliable finding, even though this phenomenon is frequently observed. Rothwell et al. demonstrated that the visit-to-visit variability in SBP was a more powerful independent predictor of stroke than mean SBP, and that an increased residual variability in SBP in treated hypertensive patients was also a strong predictor of stroke and coronary events.

Recently updated (2011) hypertension guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommend an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) [or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB)] and calcium-channel blocker (CCB) as a first line drug. Although the significance of BP variability (BPV) has been illustrated, the main focus of the current guidelines is to reduce systolic and diastolic BP, not BPV.

In the X-CELLENT study, a CCB (amlodipine) and thiazide-like diuretic drug (indapamide sustained-release) led to a significant reduction in BPV, compared to an ARB (candesartan). In addition, the CCB showed the most effective reduction in systolic BPV among the antihypertensive drug class in a meta-analysis. However, there are no direct comparison studies of a CCB and ARB on BPV. Thus, we aim to compare the systolic BPV effects of a CCB versus an ARB in essential hypertensive patients. The primary hypothesis is that an ARB is not inferior to a CCB in the reduction of the systolic BPV standard deviation (SD) in essential hypertensive patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

144

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Gangwon-do
      • Wonju, Gangwon-do, Korea, Republic of, 220-701
        • Wonju Severance Christian Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 79 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 20 years or older and below 80 years.
  • Patients who have not previously taken any antihypertensive drugs or have discontinued previous antihypertensive drugs for 2 weeks.
  • Mean SBP ≥140 mmHg or mean diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg (blood pressure will be checked at least 2 times in a seated position during the screening period).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women, possible candidate for pregnancy, or breastfeeding women.
  • Known or suspected secondary hypertension.
  • Mean seated SBP ≥ 180 mmHg and/or mean seated diastolic BP ≥ 120 mmHg at any visit.
  • Any clinically significant hepatic impairments.
  • Severe renal impairment (serum creatinine level > 3.0 mg/dL or creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min).
  • Bilateral renal artery stenosis, renal artery stenosis in a solitary kidney, or post-renal transplant.
  • Clinically relevant hyperkalemia.
  • Uncorrected volume or sodium depletion.
  • Suspected primary aldosteronism.

    1. Hypertension and spontaneous or low-dose diuretic-induced hypokalemia.
    2. Drug-resistant hypertension, defined as sub-optimally controlled hypertension on a 3-drug program that includes an adrenergic inhibitor, vasodilator, and diuretic.
    3. Hypertension with adrenal incidentaloma.
    4. Hypertension and a family history of early-onset hypertension or cerebrovascular accident at a young age (<40 years).
    5. Hypertensive first-degree relatives of patients with primary aldosteronism.
  • Symptomatic congestive heart failure.
  • Angina pectoris requiring treatment.
  • History of myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular accident (ischemic stroke or hemorrhage).
  • History of refractory or potentially lethal arrhythmias.
  • Concurrent participation in another clinical trial.
  • Patients with known intolerance, contraindication, or hypersensitivity to any component of dihydropyridines or angiotensin II receptor blockers.
  • Patients who are deemed unsuitable by the investigator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: CCB (amlodipine)
For patients who fail to respond to 5 mg oral amlodipine daily, the dose will be titrated up to 10 mg amlodipineh. At subsequent visits, additional antihypertensive therapy (hydrochlorothiazide) will be added if systolic (>140 mmHg) or diastolic (>90 mmHg) BP is inadequate. Study drugs are administered once a day for 24 weeks. The dose will be titrated up if SBP is over 90 mmHg or there are no symptoms of hypotension (syncope, loss of consciousness, or orthostatic hypotension). If up-titration is not tolerable, because of side effects or hypotension, the previous dose will be administered as the final tolerable dose.
Eligible subjects will be randomized 1:1 to either an amlodipine or a losartan group by a computer-generated random number table. For patients who fail to respond to 5 mg amlodipine, the dose will be titrated up to 10 mg amlodipine. At subsequent visits, additional antihypertensive therapy (hydrochlorothiazide) will be added if systolic (>140 mmHg) or diastolic (>90 mmHg) BP is inadequate. Study drugs are administered once a day for 24 weeks. The dose will be titrated up if SBP is over 90 mmHg or there are no symptoms of hypotension (syncope, loss of consciousness, or orthostatic hypotension). If up-titration is not tolerable, because of side effects or hypotension, the previous dose will be administered as the final tolerable dose.
Other Names:
  • Norvasc
Active Comparator: ARB (losartan)
For patients who fail to respond to 50 mg oral losartan daily, the dose will be titrated up to 100 mg losartan. At subsequent visits, additional antihypertensive therapy (hydrochlorothiazide) will be added if systolic (>140 mmHg) or diastolic (>90 mmHg) BP is inadequate. Study drugs are administered once a day for 24 weeks. The dose will be titrated up if SBP is over 90 mmHg or there are no symptoms of hypotension (syncope, loss of consciousness, or orthostatic hypotension). If up-titration is not tolerable, because of side effects or hypotension, the previous dose will be administered as the final tolerable dose.
Eligible subjects will be randomized 1:1 to either an amlodipine or a losartan group by a computer-generated random number table. For patients who fail to respond to 50 mg losartan, the dose will be titrated up to 100 mg losartan. At subsequent visits, additional antihypertensive therapy (hydrochlorothiazide) will be added if systolic (>140 mmHg) or diastolic (>90 mmHg) BP is inadequate. Study drugs are administered once a day for 24 weeks. The dose will be titrated up if SBP is over 90 mmHg or there are no symptoms of hypotension (syncope, loss of consciousness, or orthostatic hypotension). If up-titration is not tolerable, because of side effects or hypotension, the previous dose will be administered as the final tolerable dose.
Other Names:
  • Cozaar

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SD of visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability
Time Frame: 6 months
Consecutive measured blood pressure values from each visit will be averaged, and the standard deviation (SD) is calculated using the mean systolic blood pressure of each visit.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Central systolic blood pressure
Time Frame: 6 months
Measurement of central blood pressure will be performed at randomization and 6 months.
6 months
Augmentation index of central blood pressure
Time Frame: 6 months
Augmentation index of central blood pressure will be measured at randomization and 6 months.
6 months
Standard deviation of within-visit systolic blood pressure variability
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Coefficient of variation of visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability
Time Frame: 6 months
The coefficient of variation (CV) is defined as the standard deviation/mean systolic blood pressure.
6 months
Variation independent of the mean of visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability
Time Frame: 6 months
To eliminate the correlation of coefficient variation with mean SBP, we will calculate a further transformed variable, the variation independent of the mean (VIM). The VIM is defined as the standard deviation/mean^x, with x estimated from curve fitting of the data.
6 months
24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Home systolic blood pressure
Time Frame: 6 months
Home systolic blood pressure will be measured at each scheduled visit.
6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety outcome
Time Frame: 6 months
The number of all adverse events including laboratory tests, ECG changes, and vital signs.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Byung-Su Yoo, MD, PhD, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 10, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

October 17, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertension

Clinical Trials on Amlodipine

3
Subscribe