Multicentre Study To Assess Changes In Bone Mineral Density Of The Switch From Protease Inhibitors To Dolutegravir In HIV-1-Infected Subjects With Low Bone Mineral Density

MULTICENTRE STUDY TO ASSESS CHANGES IN BONE MINERAL DENSITY OF THE SWITCH FROM PROTEASE INHIBITORS TO DOLUTEGRAVIR IN HIV-1-INFECTED SUBJECTS WITH LOW BONE MINERAL DENSITY

Protease inhibitors (PI) have been associated with an acceleration of bone mineral density loss in HIV-infected individuals because of an enhanced osteoclast activity, although some controversial data have been also published. A first study suggest an increase of bone mineral density after switching from PI to raltegravir, the first generation integrase inhibitor, but there are no more data about this subject.

Based on data that PI decrease bone mineral density by accelerating osteoclast cells and that the discontinuation of this drugs could improve bone mineralization, we propose a randomized prospective multicenter study to assess the impact of switching from PI to dolutegravir on bone mineral density in patients with low bone mineral density receiving a PI-containing regimen. At the same time, the study will help to assess the antiviral efficacy and safety of a PI-sparing regimen including dolutegravir as a simplification strategy in virologically suppressed patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The second generation integrase inhibitor dolutegravir has demonstrated good virological and immunological outcomes in antiretroviral-naive subjects, compared with efavirenz, (SPRING 1 study). As well, it is active against HIV strains resistant to first-generation inhibitors raltegravir and elvitegravir in heavily treatment-experienced patients (VIKING study).

Additionally, it was safe and well tolerated after two years of use. It is administered once daily with no need for boosting, no food requirements and has a long half-life. The easy posology and its pharmacokinetics, together with the antiviral potency, make this drug a good alternative as a simplification approach. However, no clinical data are available supporting the switch of protease inhibitors or no nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors to dolutegravir in virologically suppressed HIV-treated subjects.

Protease inhibitors (PI) have been associated with an acceleration of bone mineral density loss in HIV-infected individuals because of an enhanced osteoclast activity, although some controversial data have been also published. A first study suggest an increase of bone mineral density after switching from PI to raltegravir, the first generation integrase inhibitor, but there are no more data about this subject.

Based on data that PI decrease bone mineral density by accelerating osteoclast cells and that the discontinuation of this drugs could improve bone mineralization, we propose a randomized prospective multicenter study to assess the impact of switching from PI to dolutegravir on bone mineral density in patients with low bone mineral density receiving a PI-containing regimen. At the same time, the study will help to assess the antiviral efficacy and safety of a PI-sparing regimen including dolutegravir as a simplification strategy in virologically suppressed patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

75

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Barcelona, Spain, 08025
        • Hospital De La Santa Creu I Sant Pau
      • Madrid, Spain, 28040
        • Hospital Clinico San Carlos
    • Barcelona
      • Badalona, Barcelona, Spain, 08916
        • GermansTrias i Pujol Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. HIV-infected patients over 18 years.
  2. In current antiretroviral therapy with abacavir and lamivudine (Kivexa) plus ritonavir-boosted PI, at least 6 months.
  3. Viral suppression (HIV RNA <50 copies / ml) for at least 12 months.
  4. T-score ≤ -1 evaluated by DEXA (done in the last 6 months).
  5. Signed informed consent.
  6. In potential childbearing women, commitment to use barrier contraceptive method throughout the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Suspected or documented resistance to integrase inhibitors or reverse transcriptase inhibitors, nucleoside analogues.
  2. Osteoporosis / osteopenia secondary (testosterone deficiency, thyroid disease ...), except vitamin D deficiency
  3. Treatment with bisphosphonates in the last 6 months.
  4. Have used integrase inhibitors
  5. Pregnant or breastfeeding.
  6. Patients with alanine aminotransferase (ALT)> 5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) or ALT ≥ 3 times ULN and bilirubin ≥ 1.5 times ULN (direct bilirubin> 35%)
  7. Patients with severe hepatic dysfunction (Class B or C) according to the Child-Pugh classification
  8. Patients infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) who can not use entecavir or telbivudine.
  9. Patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) in which is expected to begin treatment during the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dolutegravir 50mg
Dolutegravir 50mg every 24 hours + Kivexa (ABC+3TC)
Dolutegravir, 50mg every 24 hours
Active Comparator: Protease Inhibitor/ritonavir
Protease Inhibitor/ritonavir + Kivexa (ABC+3TC)
Protease Inhibitor/ritonavir

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Compare changes in Bone Mineral Density (BMO) measured by Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
Time Frame: From Baseline to week 48
From Baseline to week 48
Compare changes in femur T-score measured by DEXA
Time Frame: From Baseline to week 48
From Baseline to week 48
Compare changes in lumbar spine (L1-L4) T-score measured by DEXA
Time Frame: From Baseline to week 48
From Baseline to week 48

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
HIV-1 viral load
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline
HIV-1 viral load
Time Frame: week 4
week 4
HIV-1 viral load
Time Frame: week 12
week 12
HIV-1 viral load
Time Frame: week 24
week 24
HIV-1 viral load
Time Frame: week 48
week 48
CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocytes count.
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline
CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocytes count.
Time Frame: week 4
week 4
CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocytes count.
Time Frame: week 12
week 12
CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocytes count.
Time Frame: week 24
week 24
CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocytes count.
Time Frame: week 48
week 48
Genotypic test if virological failure occurs.
Time Frame: From baseline to week 48
From baseline to week 48
Compare changes in total cholesterol
Time Frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values
at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in HDL cholesterol
Time Frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values
at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in LDL cholesterol
Time Frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values
at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in triglyceride levels.
Time Frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values
at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in filtrate glomerular rate by MDRD equation
Time Frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values
at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in creatinine
Time Frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values
at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in albumine/creatinine ratio
Time Frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values
at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in proteinuria/creatinine ratio
Time Frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values
at week 48 relative to baseline values
Adverse events related to antiretroviral treatment (Toxicity).
Time Frame: From Baseline to week 48
From Baseline to week 48
Patient withdrawal
Time Frame: From Baseline to week 48
From Baseline to week 48
Compare changes in osteocalcin
Time Frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values
at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in alkaline phosphatase
Time Frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values
at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in telopeptide
Time Frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values
at week 48 relative to baseline values

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 7, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

October 22, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 30, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2015

Last Verified

November 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV-1 Infection

Clinical Trials on Dolutegravir, 50mg every 24 hours

Subscribe