Stroke Wearable Operative Rehabilitation Device Impact Trial (SWORD-IT)

November 27, 2013 updated by: Vítor Tedim Cruz, Centro Hospitalar de Entre o Douro e Vouga

Phase II Study of the Impact of the SWORD Device on Rehabilitation Tasks Performance in the Early Post Stroke Period

The objective of this study is to determine the impact of vibratory feedback on the quality and intensity of a common motor rehabilitation task of the upper-arm (hand-to-mouth) in stroke patients. For that purpose the investigators use the SWORD system that combines 3D motion quantification wearable sensors and a vibratory module.

The investigators hypothesize that vibratory stimuli during a motor rehabilitation task increase significantly the number of correct movements performed per unit of time.

The design of the study is a cross-over randomized clinical trial. With the SWORD system in place each patient will perform the hand-to-mouth task twice (with vibratory feedback and without it), the order being random. The number of correct movements and other motor outcomes will be assessed continuously under both conditions.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Guimarães, Portugal, 4835-044
        • Rehabilitation Department, Centro Hospitalar do Alto Ave, EPE
      • Santa Maria da Feira, Portugal, 4520-211
        • Neurology Department, CHEDV
      • Santa Maria da Feira, Portugal, 4520-211
        • Rehabilitation Department, CHEDV

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • More than 18 years old at stroke onset, with no superior age limit;
  • Medical diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke;
  • First ever stroke;
  • Previously independent, defined as having a modified Rankin scale (mRS) of 0-1;
  • Clinical and CT or MRI compatible with a medial cerebral artery ischemic lesion;
  • Confirmed motor deficit on the upper limb but not plegia (able to actively extend wrist, thumb, and at least 2 other digits >10°), defined as a score between 0 and 2 on items 5a or 5b of the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale;
  • Inpatients, within no more than 4 weeks after stroke onset;
  • Medically stable, no intravenous medication and already able to sit for more than one hour comfortably;
  • Favourable opinion of the attending stroke physician;
  • Patient and caregiver understand the purpose of the study and provided written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No detectable motor deficits at baseline assessment by the neurologist;
  • Severe aphasia;
  • Dementia (any stage);
  • Other cognitive or psychiatric comorbidity that impairs communication or compliance with the tasks;
  • Severe respiratory or cardiac condition incompatible with more than one minute of continuous mild exercise (e.g. combing hair) in a sitting position;
  • Pain that limits upper limb movement either on the normal or affected side;
  • Upper limb amputation or severe deformity either on the normal or affected side;
  • Fixed articular limitations of upper limb either on the normal or affected side;
  • Enrollment in other trial in the previous 3 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Hand-to-mouth task - vibratory feedback
Hand-to-mouth task under vibratory feedback and 3D movement analysis. The SWORD device is in place over the patient arm, performs continuous 3D movement analysis and provides vibratory feedback according to quality performance settings established by the clinician after patient assessment. If movement is of lower amplitude or slower than prescribed a vibratory stimulus is delivered at the wrist of the patient. The intervention is repeated on the hemiparetic and normal sides and the duration of the task is defined according to the patient cardiovascular status.
Hand-to-mouth task performed under vibratory feedback combined with 3D continuous movement analysis.
Other Names:
  • Stroke Wearable Operative Rehabilitation Device
  • Propriocetive actuation
  • Vibratory stimulation
  • SWORD
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Hand-to-mouth task - no vibratory feedback
Hand-to-mouth task in the same conditions as the experimental arm but without vibratory feedback, only 3D movement analysis. The SWORD device is in place over the patient arm, performs continuous 3D movement analysis but does not provides vibratory feedback according to quality performance settings established by the clinician after patient assessment. If movement is of lower amplitude or slower than prescribed NO vibratory stimulus is delivered at the wrist of the patient. The intervention is repeated on the hemiparetic and normal sides and the duration of the task is defined according to the patient cardiovascular status.
Hand-to-mouth task performed under 3D continuous movement analysis only
Other Names:
  • Stroke Wearable Operative Rehabilitation Device
  • SWORD
  • 3D movement quantification
  • 3D movement characterization

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of correct movements
Time Frame: At the end of each hand-to-mouth task.
Number of correct movements performed within the duration of each hand-to-mouth task.
At the end of each hand-to-mouth task.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total number of movements
Time Frame: At the end of each hand-to-mouth task.
Total number of correct and incorrect movements performed within the duration of each hand-to-mouth task.
At the end of each hand-to-mouth task.
Range of motion in degrees
Time Frame: At the end of each hand-to-mouth task.
Average, standard deviation and variance of the range of motion, measured in degrees, of all the correct movements performed during the duration of each hand-to-mouth task.
At the end of each hand-to-mouth task.
Time between correct movements in seconds
Time Frame: At the end of each hand-to-mouth task.
Average, standard deviation and variance of the time between correct movements, measured in seconds, of all the correct movements performed during the duration of each hand-to-mouth task.
At the end of each hand-to-mouth task.
Cumulative amplitude of correct movements in degrees
Time Frame: At the end of each hand-to-mouth task
Sum of the amplitudes of all correct movements performed within the duration of each hand-to-mouth task.
At the end of each hand-to-mouth task
Cumulative amplitude of all movements performed in degrees
Time Frame: At the end of each hand-to-mouth task.
Sum of the amplitudes of all correct and incorrect movements performed within the duration of each hand-to-mouth task.
At the end of each hand-to-mouth task.
Number of pause events during the task
Time Frame: At the end of each hand-to-mouth task
Number of episodes during the execution of each hand-to-mouth task where the patient stopped doing movements and/or the time between correct movements exceeded the mean plus one standard deviation measured within the same hand-to-mouth task.
At the end of each hand-to-mouth task
Fatigue
Time Frame: At the end of each hand-to-mouth task.
Assessment of fatigue by the patient through an analogic scale from 0 (no fatigue) to 4 (interruption due to fatigue).
At the end of each hand-to-mouth task.
Pain
Time Frame: At the end of each hand-to-mouth task.
Assessment of pain by the patient through an analogic scale from 0 (no pain) to 4 (interruption due to pain).
At the end of each hand-to-mouth task.
Number and type of other distresses
Time Frame: At the end of each hand-to-mouth task.
Recording and description of any kind of discomfort reported by the patient or detected through vital parameter and arterial oxygen saturation monitoring.
At the end of each hand-to-mouth task.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vítor T. Cruz, MD, Centro Hospitalar de Entre o Douro e Vouga
  • Study Chair: Paula Coutinho, PhD, IBMC - University of Oporto

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 18, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

October 22, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 28, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2013

Last Verified

November 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ischemic Stroke

Clinical Trials on Vibratory feedback and 3D movement analysis

Subscribe