Characterization of Lung Function Profile of Inhaled Tiotropium + Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination Compared to Fluticasone Propionate + Salmeterol Fixed Dose Combination in COPD Patients

January 14, 2016 updated by: Boehringer Ingelheim

Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Active-controlled, 4 Period Complete Cross-over Study to Compare the Effect on Lung Function of 6 Weeks Once Daily Treatment With Orally Inhaled Tiotropium+Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler vs. 6 Weeks Twice Daily Treatment With Fluticasone Propionate+Salmeterol Fixed Dose Combination Delivered by the Accuhaler® in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

The objective of the trial is to compare the lung function profile of once daily treatment with tiotropium+olodaterol FDC [2.5/ 5µg and 5/ 5µg] delivered by the RESPIMAT with the lung function profile of twice daily treatment with fluticasone propionate+salmeterol FDC [250/50µg and 500/50µg] delivered by the Accuhaler® after 6 weeks of treatment.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

229

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Genk, Belgium
        • 1237.11.32002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Gent, Belgium
        • 1237.11.32001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Kyjov, Czech Republic
        • 1237.11.42003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Rokycany, Czech Republic
        • 1237.11.42004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Tabor, Czech Republic
        • 1237.11.42002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Trebic, Czech Republic
        • 1237.11.42001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Hvidovre, Denmark
        • 1237.11.45002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Kolding, Denmark
        • 1237.11.45004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Odense C, Denmark
        • 1237.11.45001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Silkeborg, Denmark
        • 1237.11.45003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Großhansdorf, Germany
        • 1237.11.49003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Hamburg, Germany
        • 1237.11.49005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Mannheim, Germany
        • 1237.11.49001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Mönchengladbach, Germany
        • 1237.11.49004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Wiesbaden, Germany
        • 1237.11.49002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Debrecen, Hungary
        • 1237.11.36001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Pecs, Hungary
        • 1237.11.36004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Szeged, Hungary
        • 1237.11.36003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Szombathely, Hungary
        • 1237.11.36002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Almelo, Netherlands
        • 1237.11.31005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Breda, Netherlands
        • 1237.11.31002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Eindhoven, Netherlands
        • 1237.11.31006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Heerlen, Netherlands
        • 1237.11.31001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Hoorn, Netherlands
        • 1237.11.31007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Zutphen, Netherlands
        • 1237.11.31003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Alicante, Spain
        • 1237.11.34003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • 1237.11.34001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain
        • 1237.11.34002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Lund, Sweden
        • 1237.11.46001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  2. Relatively stable airway obstruction with a post-bronchodilator 30% </= Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1)<80% of predicted normal and a post-bronchodilator FEV1/(Forced Vital Capacity)FVC <70%
  3. Male or female patients, 40 years of age or older
  4. Smoking history of more than 10 pack years
  5. Ability to perform technically acceptable pulmonary function tests and maintain records
  6. Ability to inhale medication in a competent manner from the RESPIMAT Inhaler, Accuhaler and from a metered dose inhaler (MDI)

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Significant disease other than COPD
  2. COPD exacerbation that required treatment with antibiotics, systemic steroids (oral or iv) or hospitalization in the last 3 months.
  3. Clinically relevant abnormal lab values
  4. History of asthma
  5. Diagnosis of thyrotoxicosis
  6. Diagnosis of paroxysmal tachycardia
  7. History of myocardial infarction
  8. Unstable or life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia
  9. Hospitalization for heart failure within the past year
  10. Known active tuberculosis
  11. malignancy for which patient has undergone resection, radiation therapy or chemotherapy within last five years
  12. History of life-threatening pulmonary obstruction
  13. History of cystic fibrosis
  14. Clinically evident bronchiectasis
  15. History of significant alcohol or drug abuse
  16. History of thoracotomy with pulmonary resection
  17. oral or patch ß-adrenergics
  18. Oral corticosteroid medication within 6 weeks prior to Visit 1
  19. Regular use daytime oxygen therapy for more than one hour per day
  20. Pulmonary rehabilitation program in the six weeks prior to the screening visit
  21. Investigational drug within one month or six half lives (whichever is greater) prior to screening visit
  22. Known hypersensitivity to ß-adrenergic drugs, BAC, EDTA
  23. Pregnant or nursing women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: T+O FDC dosage 1
Low dose
placebo/dummy for blinding purposes
tiotropium high dose
tiotropium low dose
Experimental: T+O FDC dosage 2
High dose
placebo/dummy for blinding purposes
tiotropium high dose
tiotropium low dose
Active Comparator: ICS/LABA FDC Dosage 1
Low dose
placebo/dummy for blinding purposes
low dose
Active Comparator: ICS/LABA FDC Dosage 2
High dose
placebo/dummy for blinding purposes
low dose

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
FEV1 AUC (0-12h) Change From Patient Baseline After 6 Weeks of Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks.

Change from patient baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) Area Under the FEV1-time Curve from 0 to 12hours post-dose (AUC 0-12h) [L] after 6 weeks of treatment. Measured values presented are actually adjusted means.

The period baseline is defined as the pre-dose measurement taken at on the day 1 of each period. The patient baseline is defined as the mean of non-missing period baselines for each patient.

Baseline and 6 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
FEV1 AUC (0-24h) Change From Patient Baseline After 6 Weeks of Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks.

Change from patient baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) Area Under the FEV1-time Curve from 0 to 24 hours post-dose (AUC 0-24h) [L] after 6 weeks of treatment.

Measured values presented are actually adjusted means. The period baseline is defined as the pre-dose measurement taken at on the day 1 of each period. The patient baseline is defined as the mean of non-missing period baselines for each patient.

Baseline and 6 weeks.
Trough FEV1 Change From Patient Baseline After 6 Weeks of Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks.

Change from patient baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) after 6 weeks of treatment. Trough FEV1 was defined as the mean of the 23h and 23h 50min (minutes) post-dose FEV1 measurements. Measured values presented are actually adjusted means.

The period baseline is defined as the pre-dose measurement taken at on the day 1 of each period. The patient baseline is defined as the mean of non-missing period baselines for each patient.

Baseline and 6 weeks.
FEV1 AUC (12-24h) Change From Patient Baseline After 6 Weeks of Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks.

Change from patient baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) Area Under the FEV1-time Curve from 12 to 24 hours post-dose (AUC 12-24h) [L] after 6 weeks of treatment. Measured values presented are actually adjusted means.

The period baseline is defined as the pre-dose measurement taken at on the day 1 of each period. The patient baseline is defined as the mean of non-missing period baselines for each patient.

Baseline and 6 weeks.
FEV1 Peak (0-3h) Change From Patient Baseline After 6 Weeks of Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks.
Change from patient baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) peak (0-3 hours) after 6 weeks of treatment. FEV1 peak (0-3 hours) was defined as the maximum FEV1 value measured within the first three hours post dosing. Measured values presented are actually adjusted means.
Baseline and 6 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 22, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

October 25, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 12, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2016

Last Verified

January 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Clinical Trials on salmeterol

3
Subscribe