Using Ultrasound to Predict the Results of Draining Pleural Effusions

January 8, 2018 updated by: University of Oxford

Correlation of Pleural Manometry With Real-time Thoracic Ultrasound, Symptomatic Benefit and Clinical Outcome in Patients With Pleural Effusion: a Pilot Study

Pleural effusion is an extremely common problem with multiple causes; its subsequent investigation with thoracocentesis and treatment with drainage represent two of the most frequently performed diagnostic and therapeutic medical procedures. The role of thoracic ultrasonography in the management of pleural effusion is a modern and rapidly expanding one, having become effectively mandatory and part of the "gold standard" over the past decade due to its diagnostic and patient safety benefits. By contrast, the measurement of intra-pleural pressure using sequential manometry has failed to convincingly demonstrate its clinical value beyond physiological studies despite its availability for over a century. Previous work has shown a potential role for pleural manometry in predicting the presence of un-expandable lung and success of talc pleurodesis but these studies have not been replicated or clinically validated.

We intend to combine the old and new in an observational study comparing findings on thoracic ultrasonography and pleural manometry during thoracocentesis with patient-reported symptoms and the key clinical outcomes of presence of un-expandable lung and success of talc pleurodesis. The investigators hypothesise that the previously described variations in pleural elastance can be correlated with appearances and anatomical changes visualised on thoracic ultrasonography; and in combination can be reliably utilised to predict clinical outcome. The study may allow the proposal of a treatment algorithm that allows patients with pleural effusion to be managed in a more expeditious and efficient manner.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Study-specific interventions will be the monitoring of intrapleural pressure using an electronic pleural manometer (Mirador Biomedical CompassTM Thoracentesis Assist Device) and thoracic ultrasonography. Both of these are considered non-invasive and low-risk to the study participants.

As part of their standard usual clinical care, participants will undergo a diagnostic and/or therapeutic pleural intervention in the form of thoracocentesis or pleural aspiration; intercostal chest drain insertion; and/or talc pleurodesis. All of these procedures are invasive and associated with potential complications that participants will be informed about as part of standard informed consent procedures. These interventions will however be clinically indicated and carried out whether or not an individual chooses to participate in this study. For those individuals who do participate in the study, any complications of these standard clinical care procedures will be recorded as part of the data collection process for the study.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adults (> or = 18 years old) undergoing large-volume diagnostic and/or therapeutic pleural aspiration or drainage for a symptomatic pleural effusion. (Large-volume aspiration or drainage will be defined as an expectation by the clinician responsible for assessing the patient that more than 500mL of pleural fluid is to be drained on this particular occasion).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
  • Adult male or female, aged 18 years or above.
  • Diagnosed with a symptomatic pleural effusion requiring either diagnostic and/or therapeutic pleural aspiration or drainage.
  • Expectation by the clinician responsible for assessing the patient that more than 500mL of pleural fluid will be drained on this particular occasion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age less than 18 years
  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Evidence of significant septation or loculation within the pleural effusion as determined by the clinician responsible for assessing the patient.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnosis of unexpandable lung
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
Clinical and/or radiological diagnosis of unexpandable lung
Up to 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Failure of talc pleurodesis
Time Frame: 3 months
Failure of talc pleurodesis (defined as the need for a further repeat pleural procedure for symptom relief within 3 months of attempted pleurodesis).
3 months
Absolute change in patient-reported symptoms
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
Absolute change in patient-reported symptoms (dyspnoea and chest discomfort) during pleural aspiration or drainage as measured using a visual analogue scale.
Up to 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Najib Rahman, DPhil, MSc, MRCP, University of Oxford & Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Principal Investigator: John Corcoran, MD, University of Oxford

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 16, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

May 16, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 25, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

November 1, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 10, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2018

Last Verified

January 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PLMAN2013

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pleural Effusion

Clinical Trials on Pleural Manometry

Subscribe