A Phase 2 Study of CIM331 for Atopic Dermatitis Patients

January 18, 2022 updated by: Chugai Pharmaceutical

A PHASE II, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, MULTIPLE-DOSE STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, AND EFFICACY OF CIM331 IN ATOPIC DERMATITIS PATIENTS WHO ARE INADEQUATELY CONTROLLED BY OR INTOLERANT TO TOPICAL THERAPY

To assess the safety, tolerability and efficacy of CIM331, compared to placebo, in atopic dermatitis patients who are inadequately controlled by or intolerant to topical therapy

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

264

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Anniston, Alabama, United States, 36207
    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92122
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33142
    • Georgia
      • Alpharetta, Georgia, United States, 30022
    • Illinois
      • Arlington Heights, Illinois, United States, 60005
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46256
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40217
    • Michigan
      • Bay City, Michigan, United States, 48706
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28226
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29407
    • Texas
      • College Station, Texas, United States, 77845
    • Virginia
      • Norfolk, Virginia, United States, 23507

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥18 and ≤65 years of age at the time of consent.
  • Patients with Atopic Dermatitis
  • Pruritus visual analogue scale (VAS) ≥50 mm at the screening and baseline visit
  • Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) ≥10 at the screening and baseline visit
  • static Investigator's Global Assessment (sIGA) score ≥3 at the baseline visit

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Serological evidence of hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus infection
  • Known human immunodeficiency virus infection
  • Ongoing treatment with specific or non-specific hyposensitization therapy for AD
  • Treatment with mild or moderately potent topical corticosteroids (TCS) within 1 week prior to randomization
  • History of infection including skin infection requiring treatment with oral or intravenous (IV) antibiotics, antivirals, or antifungals within 1 week prior to randomization.
  • Evidence of tuberculosis (TB) infection as defined by a positive purified protein derivative (PPD) and/or positive interferon-gamma release assay.
  • Pregnant or lactating women.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Group1
Part A: nemolizumab (CIM331) Part B: nemolizumab (CIM331)
EXPERIMENTAL: Group2
Part A: nemolizumab (CIM331) Part B: nemolizumab (CIM331)
EXPERIMENTAL: Group3
Part A: nemolizumab (CIM331) Part B: nemolizumab (CIM331)
EXPERIMENTAL: Group4
Part A: nemolizumab (CIM331) Part B: nemolizumab (CIM331)
EXPERIMENTAL: Group5
Part A: Placebo Part B: nemolizumab (CIM331)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Changes From Baseline in Pruritus Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 12
Time Frame: baseline to Week 12

Percent changes from baseline in pruritus VAS at Week 12. VAS indicates pruritus intensity in the last 24 hours, from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch).

When condition of pruritus improves, percent change from baseline at Week 12 indicates negative value (i.e. the higher the absolute value is, the more the condition improves).

baseline to Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) (Part A, PP Population)
Time Frame: baseline to Week 12 (Part A)

EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of atopic eczema. The intensity of a representative area of eczema and the approximate percentage affected by eczema were calculated for each of the four body regions: head and neck, upper limbs, trunk, and lower limbs. The sum of the above 4 body region scores was calculated and should be 0 (none) to 72 (severest).

When the condition of eczema improves, the percent change from baseline at each timepoint indicates negative value (i.e. the higher the absolute value is, the more the condition improves).

baseline to Week 12 (Part A)
Changes From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) (Part A + Part B, ITT Long Population)
Time Frame: baseline to Week 12 (Part A), up to Week 64 (Part B)

EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of atopic eczema. The intensity of a representative area of eczema and the approximate percentage affected by eczema were calculated for each of the four body regions: head and neck, upper limbs, trunk, and lower limbs. The sum of the above 4 body region scores was calculated and should be 0 (none) to 72 (severest).

When the condition of eczema improves, the percent change from baseline at each timepoint indicates negative value (i.e. the higher the absolute value is, the more the condition improves).

baseline to Week 12 (Part A), up to Week 64 (Part B)
Changes From Baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) (Part A, PP Population)
Time Frame: baseline to Week 12 (Part A)

SCORAD is a clinical tool used to assess the extent and severity of eczema. Area and intensity, were assessed by the Investigator and subjective symptoms were reported by the patient in order to determine an overall score. The score should be 0 to 103: mild [<25], moderate [25-50] or severe [>50]).

When the condition of eczema improves, the percent change from baseline at each timepoint indicates negative value (i.e. the higher the absolute value is, the more the condition improves).

baseline to Week 12 (Part A)
Changes From Baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) (Part A + Part B, ITT Long Population)
Time Frame: baseline to Week 12 (Part A), up to Week 64 (Part B)

SCORAD is a clinical tool used to assess the extent and severity of eczema. Area and intensity, were assessed by the Investigator and subjective symptoms were reported by the patient in order to determine an overall score. The score should be 0 to 103: mild [<25], moderate [25-50] or severe [>50]).

When the condition of eczema improves, the percent change from baseline at each timepoint indicates negative value (i.e. the higher the absolute value is, the more the condition improves).

baseline to Week 12 (Part A), up to Week 64 (Part B)
Changes From Baseline in Static Investigator's Global Assessment (sIGA) (Part A, PP Population)
Time Frame: baseline to Week 12 (Part A)

The sIGA consisted of a 6-point severity scale from clear to very severe disease (0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild disease, 3 = moderate disease, 4 = severe disease and 5 = very severe disease). The sIGA assessed clinical characteristics of erythema, infiltration, papulation, oozing and crusting for the overall severity assessment at the time of evaluation.

When the skin condition improves, the change from baseline at each timepoint indicates negative value (i.e. the higher the absolute value is, the more the condition improves).

baseline to Week 12 (Part A)
Changes From Baseline in Static Investigator's Global Assessment (sIGA) (Part A + Part B, ITT Long Population)
Time Frame: baseline to Week 12 (Part A), up to Week 64 (Part B)

The sIGA consisted of a 6-point severity scale from clear to very severe disease (0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild disease, 3 = moderate disease, 4 = severe disease and 5 = very severe disease). The sIGA assessed clinical characteristics of erythema, infiltration, papulation, oozing and crusting for the overall severity assessment at the time of evaluation.

When the skin condition improves, the change from baseline at each timepoint indicates negative value (i.e. the higher the absolute value is, the more the condition improves).

baseline to Week 12 (Part A), up to Week 64 (Part B)
Changes From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) of Atopic Dermatitis (AD) Involvement (Part A, PP Population)
Time Frame: baseline to Week 12 (Part A)

The total BSA affected by AD was assessed as part of SCORAD. The BSA is a measure of the severity of AD, and it is considered to be severe when the rash with strong inflammation is 10 % or more of the total BSA.

When the BSA of AD involvement decreases, the change from baseline at each timepoint indicates negative value (i.e. the higher the absolute value is, the more the BSA of AD involvement decreases).

baseline to Week 12 (Part A)
Changes From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) of Atopic Dermatitis (AD) Involvement (Part A + Part B, ITT Long Population)
Time Frame: baseline to Week 12 (Part A), up to Week 64 (Part B)

The total BSA affected by AD was assessed as part of SCORAD. The BSA is a measure of the severity of AD, and it is considered to be severe when the rash with strong inflammation is 10 % or more of the total BSA.

When the BSA of AD involvement decreases, the change from baseline at each timepoint indicates negative value (i.e. the higher the absolute value is, the more the BSA of AD involvement decreases).

baseline to Week 12 (Part A), up to Week 64 (Part B)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Ryosuke Mihara, Chugai Pharmaceutical

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 31, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 19, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 25, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atopic Dermatitis

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe