The Utility of Intensified Case Finding Combined With a Package of Novel TB Diagnostics Using a Mobile Clinic in Africa (XACT)

November 24, 2015 updated by: Keertan Dheda, University of Cape Town

The Utility of Intensified Case Finding Combined With a Package of Novel TB Diagnostics Using a Mobile Clinic in Africa- a Randomized Controlled Trial (XACT)

The purpose of this study is to compare two different methods of intensified tuberculosis (TB) case finding in the community. These methods all involve the use of a mobile clinic to reach people with TB symptoms who are not able to readily access clinic services. A standard diagnostics package consisting of smear microscopy and culture (with smear result available the next day) will be compared with a novel diagnostics package involving point-of-care sputum GeneXpert MTB/RIF performed at a mobile or conventional clinic (with same day result), sputum culture, and lateral flow urinary lipoarabinomannan (LAM) testing (in HIV +ve subjects only). The primary outcome is a comparison between the number of culture +ve subjects on TB treatment in each group at the end of two months. A secondary aim is an evaluation of the accuracy and feasibility of GeneXpert performed in a mobile clinic. Additional study aims include using chest X-rays obtained during the study to develop and validate of an computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) software package for TB (together with collaborators in the Netherlands), as well as establishing whether LAM is detectable at sub-ELISA concentrations in the urine of those with TB.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Despite recent advances in diagnosis and the availability of effective anti-tuberculous treatment TB remains one of the world's most devastating infectious disease, with a global prevalence of more than 14 million in 2006. In high burden communities with the co-localised HIV epidemic, a major problem hampering control efforts and promulgating the TB epidemic is the large reservoir of undiagnosed TB disease. This comprises over 50% of the total TB burden. HIV-infection with its atypical yet infectious presentation where immunity is attenuated worsens this undetected reservoir. Thus, there is a large case load in the community that do not access health care or do so late in the course of the disease and there is thus ongoing disease transmission within the community. If this caseload in not addressed then the TB epidemic will never be controlled.

Intensified case finding seeks to address this problem. Intensified case finding is a strategy to identify and treat people with TB who have not sought diagnostic services on their own initiative. By contrast, passive case finding is only able to identify people with TB presenting to health care facilities. In 2008 the WHO and Stop TB partnership identified intensified case-finding as one of four core TB prevention strategies necessary to meet the sixth Millennium Development Goal of halving the prevalence of TB by 2015. To date, a number of studies have illustrated the success of intensified case finding to increase case-detection rates (especially in HIV-infected populations) and to shorten time to diagnosis thereby limiting attendant morbidity and mortality.

Given both the importance and resource-intensive nature of intensified case finding it is essential that the optimal, operationally feasible and most cost-effective screening strategy be used. To date, screening strategies have varied widely across studies but all have used a combination of symptom screening, radiological (CXR) and microscopy-centre based laboratory diagnostics (smear microscopy and, if available and cost permitting, TB culture). This is a major shortcoming as it is now well established that these standard diagnostic tools perform sub-optimally especially in high HIV prevalent settings. With the recent development of a number of novel TB diagnostic tools with superior performance compared to conventional modalities, and the potential for point-of-care (POC) and point-of-treatment usage, it is imperative that intensified case-finding strategies be reviewed. The 2010 updated WHO "Guidelines for intensified tuberculosis case finding and isoniazid preventive therapy for people living with HIV in resource constrained settings" recommends the use of a clinical algorithm for intensified case finding programmes for adults and adolescents living with HIV and it is important that the incremental diagnostic benefit together with the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of these novel TB diagnostic tools be assessed for use in intensified case finding programmes within the context of these updated guidelines.

In 2009, Cepheid released the Xpert® MTB/RIF Assay, which is the only system able to deliver answers directly from unprocessed samples by combining on-board preparation of the sample with real-time PCR in less than 2 hours. Additionally, the Xpert® MTB/RIF Assay allows for simultaneous on-demand molecular testing for the detection of M.tb and RIF resistance. The GeneXpert™ system consists of a GeneXpert instrument, personal computer and disposable fluidic cartridges. The system combines cartridge-based sample preparation with amplification and detection in a fully integrated and automated nucleic acid analysis instrument. GeneXpert has been shown to be an accurate tool for the rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis in both smear-positive and smear-negative samples (with a single Xpert test having a sensitivity of ~ 70% in smear-negative samples. A large demonstration study of Gene Xpert based at microscopy-centres is currently underway and preliminary data appear promising. However, GeneXpert technology has not been used as part of a screening strategy for intensified case finding and its operational feasible as a point-of-treatment diagnostic technology based in a mobile clinic has not yet been assessed.

In our recent review we have proposed urinary LAM as a useful "rule in" test for TB in HIV-infected subjects with advanced immune-suppression. Additionally, the recent development of a point-of-care urine LAM lateral flow strip test - the Determine TB® - with preliminary results suggesting equivalent performance to the LAM ELISA make it an appealing diagnostic for high HIV prevalence areas. A recent study has shown urine LAM to be more sensitive than smear-microscopy in an ARV clinic-based TB screening study. The use of the Determine TB® lateral flow strip test has not been studied as part of an intensified case finding strategy for population-based surveys. The Determine TB® lateral flow test will be used for screening of HIV-infected patients at point-of-care within the community and subsequent TB clinic referral for sputum-based diagnostics.

The XACT study has a randomised control study design to evaluate the impact of a package of novel TB diagnostic tools in the community using a mobile unit compared to standard intensive-case finding methods. The feasibility of performing new TB diagnostics at the point-of-care will be examined to determine if the proportion of patients identified, initiating, and completing TB treatment, is greater compared to the standard diagnostic arm. Further, the cost-effectiveness of TB cases detected and successfully completing treatment between study arms can also be investigated.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

875

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Sassari, Italy, 07100
        • University of Sassari
      • Nijmegen, Netherlands, 6500 HB
        • Radboud University
    • Western Province
      • Cape Town, Western Province, South Africa, 7945
        • University of Cape Town
      • Harare, Zimbabwe, P O Box A178 Avondale
        • University of Zimbabwe

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Community participant willing to complete community-based symptom screening, urine testing and/or undergo TB diagnostic tests at the local TB clinic.
  2. Provision of informed consent.
  3. HIV-negative adults (older than 18 years) with 1 or more of the following:

    • cough ≥ 2 weeks
    • loss of weight
    • persistent fever ≥ 2 weeks and/or
    • a single recorded temp > 38°C
    • night sweats
    • generalized fatigue
    • hemoptysis or
    • chest pain
  4. Any HIV+ve adult (older than 18 years).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability to provide informed consent (e.g. mentally impaired).
  2. Patients self-presenting to the TB clinics.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Novel
Patients in this arm will receive 3 sputum samples for GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay and MGIT liquid TB culture.
Smear microscopy involve sputum smear with either ziehl-neelsen or auramine-O staining of slides and light or fluorescence microscopy reading
Automated nucleic-acid amplification test (fully integrated) test for TB
Other Names:
  • Cepheid GeneXpert MTB/RIF
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Standard
Patients in this arm will receive 2 sputum samples for fluorescence smear microscopy and MGIT liquid TB culture.
Smear microscopy involve sputum smear with either ziehl-neelsen or auramine-O staining of slides and light or fluorescence microscopy reading

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of novel intensive-case finding diagnostic tools to standard intensive-case finding strategy
Time Frame: 2 months
The proportion of culture-positive TB cases initiating TB treatment in each study arm.
2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The proportion of culture-positive TB cases completing TB treatment in each study arm
Time Frame: 6 months
The number of patients that are enrolled, randomized to a study arm, diagnosed with TB, and completing TB treatment.
6 months
Feasibility of performing Xpert MTB/RIF at the point-of-care in a mobile unit using an alternative power supply
Time Frame: 6 months
Feasibility indicators for the performance of Xpert in a mobile unit. These include turn-around-time, user appraisal and assessments and performance comparisons between mobile clinic and laboratory-based Xpert MTB/RIF.
6 months
Cost per TB case detected between study arms
Time Frame: 6 months
Documentation of patient costs for TB diagnosis.
6 months
Cost per TB case successfully completing treatment between study arms
Time Frame: 6 months
Documentation of patient costs for completing TB treatment.
6 months
Determining whether LAM is present at sub-ELISA concentrations using mass spectroscopy of urine samples from TB patients
Time Frame: 6 months
Urine from subjects will be used to verify whether LAM is present in the urine of HIV-infected persons with TB at sub-ELISA concentrations using mass spectrometry. LAM standards will be used in spiked urine samples to evaluate limit of detection and specificity.
6 months
Validating the electronic chest X-ray scoring system for Computer Aided Diagnostics (CAD) of TB
Time Frame: 6 months
The method employs an automatic scoring algorithm to interpret digitalized chest x-rays. The system is suited to x-rays being done in remote areas where medical expertise is not available.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Keertan Dheda, MBChB, PhD, University of Cape Town

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 24, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 21, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 25, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2015

Last Verified

November 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tuberculosis

Clinical Trials on Smear microscopy

3
Subscribe