CEP249 Pediatric Accuracy Study

August 28, 2018 updated by: Medtronic Diabetes

A Performance Evaluation of the Enlite™ and Enlite 3 Glucose Sensor to Support Use in Children

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the Enlite Sensor™ and Enlite 3 Sensor performance in pediatric patients with insulin requiring diabetes at the beginning, middle and end of sensor wear.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study is a prospective, single arm, multi-center, in-clinic study.. There will be two consecutive phases of the study:

A total of up to 260 subjects (2-18 years old) will be enrolled at up to 15 investigational centers

Subjects will come for clinic visit for YSI reference glucose testing and for Enlite Sensor™ and Enlite 3 Sensor™ testing. SMBG (Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose) reference measurement is for subjects 2-6 years of age and cannot tolerate YSI.

Study has a run-in period and a study period with a total of 10 visits

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

186

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Escondido, California, United States, 92025
        • AMCR Institute
      • Torrance, California, United States, 90505
        • SoCal Diabetes
      • Walnut Creek, California, United States, 94598
        • Diablo Clinical Research
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • Barbara Davis Center
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06511
        • Yale University, Yale Diabetes Research Program
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32207
        • Nemours Children's Clinic
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30318
        • "Atlanta Diabetes Associates
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Indiana University, Riley Hospital for Children
    • Iowa
      • Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52242
        • University of Iowa Children Hospital
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73104
        • OUHSC Department of Pediatrics
    • Washington
      • Renton, Washington, United States, 98057
        • Rainier Clinical Research Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is 2-18 years of age at time of screening
  2. Subject has been diagnosed with insulin requiring diabetes mellitus for at least one year.
  3. Subject is willing to perform greater than or equal to 4 finger stick blood glucose measurements daily
  4. Subject is willing to perform required sensor calibrations
  5. Subject is willing to wear the system (Guardian Mobile application, pumps, sensors, meter) continuously throughout the study
  6. Adequate venous access as assessed by investigator or appropriate staff

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is unable to tolerate tape adhesive in the area of sensor placement
  2. Subject has any unresolved adverse skin condition in the area of sensor or device placement (e.g., psoriasis, rash, Staphylococcus infection)
  3. Subject is actively participating in an investigational study (drug or device) wherein they have received treatment from an investigational study (drug or device) in the last 2 weeks
  4. Females of child-bearing potential who have a positive pregnancy test at screening or plans to become pregnant during the course of the study
  5. Subjects with hematocrit lower than the normal age specific reference range per central or local lab testing

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Enlite sensors
Each subject will first wear enlite sensors and will come for clinic visit for YSI (Yellow Spring Instruments). Then each subject will wear enlite 3 sensors and will come for clinic visit for YSI (Yellow Spring Instruments) or SMBG (Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose) testing. SMBG testings are for subjects 2-6 years of age and cannot tolerate YSI. In addition. In addition, subjects aged 2-6 years old will not participate in Enlite phase. They only participate in Enlite 3 phase.
Subject wears enlite sensor first and followed by enlite 3 sensor.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Enlite Sensor Accuracy Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD), With Lower Serial Number 530G Pump
Time Frame: 6 days
Enlite Sensor accuracy relative to the YSI (Yellow Spring Instruments) reference. Each subject wore two 530G pumps. The results for the lower serial number pump worn by each subject were arbitrarily selected and pooled across subjects for the primary dataset. MARD = Mean of ((Absolute difference of YSI reference and Sensor glucose values / YSI reference glucose values) * 100). Therefore, the unit of MARD is percentage (%). Note that results from multiple testing days were pooled together for reporting purpose.
6 days
Enlite 3 Sensor Accuracy Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD), With the Guardian Mobile System
Time Frame: 7 days
Enlite 3 Sensor accuracy using Guardian Mobile System compared to YSI or SMBG (Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose) reference values. For subjects 2-6 years of age, SMBG was used as a reference value if YSI cannot be tolerated. MARD = Mean of ((Absolute difference of reference and Sensor glucose values / reference glucose values) * 100). Therefore, the unit of MARD is percentage (%). Note that results from multiple testing days will be pooled together for reporting purpose.
7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Enlite 3 Sensor Accuracy Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD), With the GST3C Transmitter
Time Frame: 7 days
Enlite 3 Sensor accuracy using GST3C transmitter used as a recorder compared to YSI or SMBG reference values. For subjects 2-6 years of age, SMBG was used as a reference value if YSI cannot be tolerated. MARD = Mean of ((Absolute difference of reference and Sensor glucose values / reference glucose values) * 100). Therefore, the unit of MARD is percentage (%). Note that results from multiple testing days will be pooled together for reporting purpose.
7 days
Enlite Sensor Accuracy Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD), With Higher Serial Number 530G Pump
Time Frame: 6 Days
Enlite Sensor accuracy relative to the YSI reference. Each subject wore two 530G pumps. The results for the higher serial number pump worn by each subject were arbitrarily selected and pooled across subjects for the secondary dataset. MARD = Mean of ((Absolute difference of YSI reference and Sensor glucose values / YSI reference glucose values) * 100). Therefore, the unit of MARD is percentage (%). Note that results from multiple testing days were pooled together for reporting purpose.
6 Days
Enlite Sensor Accuracy Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD), With Lower Serial Number 530G Pump, Using One Additional Calibration During FST
Time Frame: 6 Days
Enlite Sensor accuracy relative to the YSI reference, using one additional calibration during FST. MARD = Mean of ((Absolute difference of YSI reference and Sensor glucose values / YSI reference glucose values) * 100). Therefore, the unit of MARD is percentage (%). Note that results from multiple testing days were pooled together for reporting purpose.
6 Days
Enlite Sensor Accuracy Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD), With Higher Serial Number 530G Pump, Using One Additional Calibration During FST
Time Frame: 6 Days
Enlite Sensor accuracy relative to the YSI reference, using one additional calibration during FST. MARD = Mean of ((Absolute difference of YSI reference and Sensor glucose values / YSI reference glucose values) * 100). Therefore, the unit of MARD is percentage (%). Note that results from multiple testing days were pooled together for reporting purpose.
6 Days
Enlite 3 Sensor Accuracy Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD), With the Guardian Mobile System, Using One Additional Calibration During FST
Time Frame: 7 Days
Enlite 3 Sensor accuracy using Guardian Mobile System compared to YSI or SMBG reference values, with one additional calibration during FST. For subjects 2-6 years of age, SMBG was used as a reference value if YSI cannot be tolerated. MARD = Mean of ((Absolute difference of reference and Sensor glucose values / reference glucose values) * 100). Therefore, the unit of MARD is percentage (%). Note that results from multiple testing days will be pooled together for reporting purpose.
7 Days
Enlite 3 Sensor Accuracy Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD), With GST3C Transmitter, Using One Additional Calibration During FST
Time Frame: 7 Days
Enlite 3 Sensor accuracy using GST3C transmitter used as a recorder compared to YSI or SMBG reference values, with one additional calibration during FST. For subjects 2-6 years of age, SMBG was used as a reference value if YSI cannot be tolerated. MARD = Mean of ((Absolute difference of reference and Sensor glucose values / reference glucose values) * 100). Therefore, the unit of MARD is percentage (%). Note that results from multiple testing days will be pooled together for reporting purpose.
7 Days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ronald Brazg, MD, Rainier Clinical Research Center
  • Principal Investigator: Robert Slover, MD, Barbara Davis Center
  • Principal Investigator: Kevin Kaiserman, MD, SoCal Diabetes
  • Principal Investigator: Jeanie Tryggestad, MD, OUHSC Department of Pediatrics
  • Principal Investigator: Linda DiMeglio, MD, Indiana University, Riley Hospital for Children
  • Principal Investigator: Larry Fox, MD, Nemours Children's Clinic
  • Principal Investigator: Jennifer Sherr, MD, Yale University, Yale Diabetes Research Program
  • Principal Investigator: Eva Tsalikian, MD, University of Iowa Children Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

November 25, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 27, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CEP249

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Insulin Requiring Diabetes

Clinical Trials on Enlite sensors

Subscribe