A Study of Tarceva (Erlotinib) in Combination With Platinum Based Chemotherapy in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

December 12, 2014 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche

A Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Phase II of Sequential Administration of Tarceva (Erlotinib) or Placebo in Combination With Gemcitabine/Platinum as First-line Treatment in Patients With Stage IIIB/IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of sequential administration of Tarceva and gemcitabine/platinum chemotherapy in patients with stage IIIb/IV non-small cell lung cancer. Patients will be randomized to receive Tarceva (150 mg po) or placebo on days 15-28 of a 4 week cycle of intravenous platinum-based chemotherapy, for a total of 6 cycles. The anticipated time on study treatment is until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

154

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Campbelltown, Australia, 2560
      • Camperdown, Australia, 2050
      • Liverpool, Australia, 2170
      • Guangzhou, China, 510060
      • Guangzhou, China, 510080
      • Shanghai, China, 200433
      • Shanghai, China, 200030
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
      • Jakarta, Indonesia, 10430
      • Jakarta, Indonesia, 10410
      • Jogjakarta, Indonesia, 55284
      • Semarang, Indonesia, 50136
      • Kyunggi-do, Korea, Republic of, 411-769
      • Manila, Philippines, 1000
      • Metro Manila, Philippines, 1502
      • Taipei, Taiwan
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 100
      • Bangkok, Thailand, 10400
      • Bangkok, Thailand, 10700

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult patients, >=18 years of age;
  • histologically documented advanced or recurrent stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer;
  • measurable disease;
  • no previous chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unstable systemic disease;
  • any other malignancies in the last 5 years.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Tarceva + gemcitabine/platinum
150 mg orally daily Days 15 to 28 of each 4-week cycle for 6 cycles, followed by 150 mg orally daily
1250 mg/m2 iv Days 1 and 8 of each 4-week cycle, 6 cycles
75 mg/m2 iv Day 1 of each 4.wek cycle, 6 cycles; or carboplatin
5 x AUC iv Day 1 of each 4.week cycle, 6 cycles; or cisplatin
Placebo Comparator: Placebo + gemcitabine/platinum
1250 mg/m2 iv Days 1 and 8 of each 4-week cycle, 6 cycles
75 mg/m2 iv Day 1 of each 4.wek cycle, 6 cycles; or carboplatin
5 x AUC iv Day 1 of each 4.week cycle, 6 cycles; or cisplatin
orally daily Days 15 to 28 of each 4-week cycle for 6 cycles, followed by daily oral application

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Non-Progression at Week 8 as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)
Time Frame: Week 8
Non-progression defined as documented best overall tumor response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD; where SD was maintained for greater than [>]8 weeks) per RECIST. Investigator's assessment of response used in all analyses. CR equals (=)disappearance of all target lesions; PR=at least a 30 percent (%) decrease in sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD; SD=neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression, taking as reference smallest sum LD since treatment started.
Week 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Non-Progression at Week 16 as Assessed by RECIST
Time Frame: Week 16
Non-progression defined as documented best overall tumor response of CR, PR, or SD (where SD was maintained for >16 weeks) per RECIST.
Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Confirmed CR or PR as Assessed by RECIST
Time Frame: Screening/Baseline, Day 22 of Cycles 2, 4 and 6 and every 8 weeks in Post-Study and Off-Study Phases
CR=disappearance of all target lesions; PR=at least a 30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD.
Screening/Baseline, Day 22 of Cycles 2, 4 and 6 and every 8 weeks in Post-Study and Off-Study Phases
Duration of Response
Time Frame: Screening/Baseline, Day 22 of Cycles 2, 4 and 6 and every 8 weeks in Post-Study and Off-study Phases
Duration of Response was defined similarly for complete responders and partial responders. CR was defined as the date CR was first recorded to the date on which PD was first noted or date of death. PR was defined as the date the first PR was recorded to the date of the first observation of PD or date of death.
Screening/Baseline, Day 22 of Cycles 2, 4 and 6 and every 8 weeks in Post-Study and Off-study Phases
Time to Progression
Time Frame: Screening/Baseline, Day 22 of Cycles 2, 4 and 6 and every 8 weeks in Post-Study and Off-Study Phases
Time to progression was defined as the interval between the day of randomization and the first documentation of PD. Participants who were withdrawn from the study without documented progression and for whom there exists CRF evidence that evaluations have been made, were censored at 1) the date of the last tumor assessment, 2) last date in the drug log, or 3) last date of follow-up when the participant was known to be progression free, whichever was last. Participants without post-baseline tumor assessments but known to be alive were censored at the time of randomization.
Screening/Baseline, Day 22 of Cycles 2, 4 and 6 and every 8 weeks in Post-Study and Off-Study Phases
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: Screening/Baseline, Day 22 of Cycles 2, 4 and 6 and every 8 weeks in Post-Study and Off-Study Phases
PFS was defined as the interval between the day of randomization and the date of first documentation of progressive disease or date of death, whichever came first.
Screening/Baseline, Day 22 of Cycles 2, 4 and 6 and every 8 weeks in Post-Study and Off-Study Phases
Overall Survival
Time Frame: Date of randomization until date of death or date of last follow-up assessment
Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death, regardless of the cause of death. Participants who were alive at the time of the analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up assessment.
Date of randomization until date of death or date of last follow-up assessment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

December 2, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 13, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2014

Last Verified

December 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on erlotinib [Tarceva]

3
Subscribe