A Study of Herceptin (Trastuzumab) Combination Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Cancer

February 9, 2015 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche

An Open-label Pilot Study Evaluating the Effect of a Combination Regimen of Herceptin, Cisplatin, and Gemcitabine on Time to Disease Progression in Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Cancer

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of a chemotherapy regimen of intravenous Herceptin, cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer. The anticipated time on study treatment is until disease progression.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

13

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aschersleben, Germany, 06449
      • Dessau, Germany, 06846
      • Fulda, Germany, 36043
      • Leipzig, Germany, 04103
      • Leipzig, Germany, 04277
      • Marburg, Germany, 35043
      • Weiden, Germany, 92637

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult patients with >=18 years of age;
  • metastatic urothelial carcinoma;
  • measurable metastases or local recurrent disease;
  • no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease;
  • HER2 overexpression (IHC [2+] or [3+]).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • concomitant chemotherapy or immunotherapy;
  • active or uncontrolled infection;
  • solely CNS metastases;
  • clinically significant cardiac disease, advanced pulmonary disease or severe dyspnoea;
  • co-existing malignancies diagnosed within last 5 years, except basal cell cancer or cervical cancer in situ.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Trastuzumab, Gemcitabine, Cisplatin
Participants received an initial loading dose of 4 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) trastuzumab intravenous (i.v.) on Day 3 of Cycle 1, followed by weekly doses of 2 mg/kg i.v until disease progression; 1200 mg per square meter (m2) gemcitabine i.v. on Days 1, 8, and 15 of Cycles 1 through 6; and 70 mg/m2 cisplatin i.v. on Day 2 of Cycles 1 through 6.
4 mg/kg i.v., Day 3 of Cycle 1, followed by weekly doses of 2 mg/kg i.v., Day 1 of Cycle 2 until disease progression
Other Names:
  • Herceptin
1200 mg/m2 i.v. on Days 1, 8, and 15 of Cycle 1 through 6
70 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 2 of Cycles 1 through 6

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) - Percentage of Participants With an Event
Time Frame: Screening, Day 1 of Cycles 1 through 6, every 4 weeks until end of treatment, up to 33 months
PFS was defined as the time from the first dose of study treatment to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause.
Screening, Day 1 of Cycles 1 through 6, every 4 weeks until end of treatment, up to 33 months
Progression-Free Survival - Time to Event
Time Frame: Screening, Day 1 of Cycles 1 through 6, every 4 weeks until end of treatment, up to 33 months
The median time, in months, from the first dose of study treatment to PFS event.
Screening, Day 1 of Cycles 1 through 6, every 4 weeks until end of treatment, up to 33 months
Percentage of Participants Who Were Progression Free at 12 and 24 Months
Time Frame: Screening, and Months 12 and 24
Screening, and Months 12 and 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival (OS) - Percentage of Participants With an Event
Time Frame: Screening, Day 1 of Cycles 1 through 6, every 4 weeks until end of treatment, up to 36 months
OS was defined as the time from the start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause.
Screening, Day 1 of Cycles 1 through 6, every 4 weeks until end of treatment, up to 36 months
Overall Survival - Time to Event
Time Frame: Screening, Day 1 of Cycles 1 through 6, every 4 weeks until end of treatment, up to 36 months
The median time, in months, from the start of study treatment to OS event.
Screening, Day 1 of Cycles 1 through 6, every 4 weeks until end of treatment, up to 36 months
Percentage of Participants Surviving at 12 and 24 Months
Time Frame: Screening, and Months 12 and 24
Screening, and Months 12 and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD)
Time Frame: Screening, Day 1 of Cycles 1 through 6, every 4 weeks until end of treatment, up to 33 months
Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1): CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease, with the exception of nodal disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must have decreased to normal [(short axis less than (<) 10 millimeters (mm)]. No new lesions. PR was defined as greater than or equal to (≥) 30 percent (%) decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions. The short axis was used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease. No new lesions. SD was defined as not qualifying for CR, PR, or Progressive Disease (PD).
Screening, Day 1 of Cycles 1 through 6, every 4 weeks until end of treatment, up to 33 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2001

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 5, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

December 10, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 11, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2015

Last Verified

February 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urinary Tract Cancer

Clinical Trials on trastuzumab

3
Subscribe