Supraclavicular Versus Interscalene Block

December 12, 2013 updated by: Cheju Halla General Hospital

A Randomized Comparison of Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular and Interscalene Block After Shoulder Surgery

We hypothesize that both ultrasound-guided supraclavicular and interscalene block provide similar analgesia after shoulder surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

Interscalene block provides effective postoperative analgesia after shoulder surgery. However, it can be associated with significant risk including the phrenic nerve palsy. Previous study reported that ultrasound-guided interscalene and supraclavicular blocks are effective and safe for shoulder arthroscopy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Jeju self-governing province
      • Jeju, Jeju self-governing province, Korea, Republic of, 670-744
        • Recruiting
        • Cheju Halla General Hopsital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Chunwoo Yang, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 78 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III inpatients undergoing shoulder surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

pregnancy, severe respiratory disease, preexisting neuropathy in the operated arm, coagulopathy, allergy to study medication

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Interscalene block
Interscalene block is performed under ultrasound guidance. Linear probe is placed on the ipsilateral interscalene groove visualizing the brachial plexus located between anterior and middle scalene muscles. Using in-plane technique, an insulated needle is advanced into the brachial plexus sheath, into which 20 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine is injected.
Ultrasound-guided interscalene block is performed.
Experimental: Supraclavicular block
Supraclavicular block is performed under ultrasound guidance. Linear probe is placed on the ipsilateral supraclavicular fossa visualizing the brachial plexus located lateral to the subclavian artery. Using in-plane technique, an insulated needle is advanced into the brachial plexus sheath, into which 20 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine is injected.
Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block is performed

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
pain duration
Time Frame: at 24h after operation
at 24h after operation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
diaphragmatic movement
Time Frame: preoperative, after block(at 30 min), after operation
preoperative, after block(at 30 min), after operation
motor block
Time Frame: after block(at 30 min), after operation, at 24h
after block(at 30 min), after operation, at 24h
paresthesia
Time Frame: after block(at 30min), after operation, at 24h
after block(at 30min), after operation, at 24h
complications
Time Frame: after block (at 30 min), after operation, at 24h
after block (at 30 min), after operation, at 24h
supplemental analgesia
Time Frame: after operation, at 24h
after operation, at 24h
pain score
Time Frame: at 24h
at 24h
patient satisfaction
Time Frame: at 24h
at 24h

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chunwoo Yang, MD, Dep. of anesthesia and pain medicine, Cheju Halla General Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

December 18, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 18, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2013

Last Verified

December 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Inter1
  • 2013-M10 (Other Identifier: Cheju Halla General Hospital)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Interscalene block

3
Subscribe