Rebif® Rebidose® Versus Rebiject II® Ease-of-Use

January 13, 2017 updated by: EMD Serono

A Phase IV, Randomized, Prospective, US-based, Multicenter, Cross-over Study Evaluating Subject Ease-of-use With Rebif® Rebidose® and Rebiject II® Autoinjectors in Subjects With Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) Treated With REBIF® 44 mcg Subcutaneously Three Times a Week

This is a Phase 4, prospective, open-label, randomized, cross-over, multicenter trial to evaluate ease-of-use with Rebif® Rebidose® and Rebiject II® autoinjectors in subjects with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Subjects will participate in the study for up to 10 weeks (including screening and treatment periods). The treatment period will last 8 weeks and include 12 self-injections using the Rebif® Rebidose® device and 12 self-injections using the Rebiject II® device.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

97

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Cullman, Alabama, United States, 35058
        • Research Site
    • Arizona
      • Tuscon, Arizona, United States, 85718
        • Research Site
    • California
      • Newport Beach, California, United States, 92663
        • Research Site
    • Colorado
      • Ft. Collins, Colorado, United States, 80528
        • Research Site
    • Delaware
      • Dover, Delaware, United States, 19901
        • Research Site
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • Research Site
      • Sunrise, Florida, United States, 33351
        • Research Site
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30327
        • Research Site
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46256
        • Research Site
    • Massachusetts
      • Foxboro, Massachusetts, United States, 02035
        • Research Site
    • Minnesota
      • Golden Valley, Minnesota, United States, 55422
        • Research Site
    • New Jersey
      • Stratford, New Jersey, United States, 08084
        • Research Site
    • New York
      • Patchogue, New York, United States, 11772
        • Research Site
    • North Carolina
      • Hickory, North Carolina, United States, 28602
        • Research Site
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27103
        • Research Site
    • Ohio
      • Dayton, Ohio, United States, 45417
        • Research Site
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73104
        • Research Site
    • Pennsylvania
      • Greensburg, Pennsylvania, United States, 15601
        • Research Site
    • South Carolina
      • Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States, 29307
        • Research Site
    • Tennessee
      • Knoxville, Tennessee, United States, 37934
        • Research Site
    • Texas
      • Mansfield, Texas, United States, 76063
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 61 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female subjects, 18 to 65 years of age inclusive, at the time of informed consent signature
  • Diagnosis of RRMS
  • Receiving Rebif®, 44 microgram subcutaneously three times a week, by manual injection for at least 12 weeks before the screening assessment and previous use of either Rebif® Rebidose® or Rebiject II® devices is acceptable if they have not been using them for the past 12 weeks prior to study entry and if, in the judgment of the investigator, the subjects are not experienced users
  • Subject is capable of self-injecting using Rebif® Rebidose® and Rebiject II® injection devices
  • Subject is willing and able to comply with the study procedures for the duration of the trial
  • Signed, informed consent and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) authorization before any trial-related activities are performed
  • Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at screening to be included in the trial and must be willing to avoid pregnancy by using a highly effective method of contraception
  • Outpatient status at the time of screening
  • Stable disease status without a history of surgical procedure or hospitalization within 30 days prior to Study Day 1, and with no surgical intervention planned for the duration of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Received MS therapy other than Rebif® within the 12 weeks before screening or at any time during the trial
  • Inadequate liver function and bone marrow reserve as defined in the protocol
  • Current complete transverse myelitis, bilateral optic neuritis, or neuromyelitis optica
  • History of injection-site necrosis within 12 months before study entry
  • History of alcohol or drug abuse in the past year
  • Any autoimmune disorder, except for thyroid disease stable on medication
  • Subject having moderate to severe renal impairment, in the Investigator's opinion.
  • Diagnosis of primary progressive, secondary progressive, or progressive relapsing MS
  • Participation in another clinical trial within the past 30 days or an interventional trial for MS in the past 12 weeks
  • Use of high-dose steroids within 14 days of screening
  • Currently experiencing moderate to severe active inflammatory skin disease at sites of expected Rebif® injections
  • History of clinically significant lipoatrophy at sites of expected Rebif® injections, in the investigator's opinion
  • Current major depression or suicidal ideation or suicide attempt in the past year
  • Experiencing spasticity which in the opinion of the Investigator, could interfere with self-injections
  • Pregnant or lactating
  • Inability to self-inject or visual impairment which, in the opinion of the Investigator, is severe enough, even with correction, to impede the subject's participation in this study
  • Upper extremity deficit which, in the opinion of the Investigator, is severe enough to impede the subject's participation in this study
  • Cognitive deficit which, in the opinion of the Investigator, is severe enough to impede the subject's participation in this study
  • Subject-reported reason that he/she cannot complete the 8-week study
  • Any other medical condition, which in the opinion of the Investigator makes the subject unsuitable for this study
  • Known hypersensitivity to the trial treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: First Rebif Rebidose, Then Rebiject II
Subjects will self-inject Rebif at a dose of 44 microgram (mcg) subcutaneously three times a week by using Rebif Rebidose self-injector device in Treatment Period 1 for 4 weeks followed by self-injecting Rebif at a dose of 44 mcg subcutaneously three times a week by using Rebiject II self-injector device in Treatment Period 2 (4 weeks) for the next 4 weeks.
Rebif 44 mcg will be injected subcutaneously three times a week using Rebif Rebidose self-injector device.
Rebif 44 mcg will be injected subcutaneously three times a week using Rebiject II self-injector device.
Experimental: First Rebiject II, Then Rebif Rebidose
Subjects will self-inject Rebif at a dose of 44 mcg subcutaneously three times a week by using Rebiject II self-injector device in Treatment Period 1 for 4 weeks followed by self-injecting Rebif at a dose of 44 mcg subcutaneously three times a week by using Rebif Rebidose self-injector device in Treatment Period 2 for the next 4 weeks.
Rebif 44 mcg will be injected subcutaneously three times a week using Rebif Rebidose self-injector device.
Rebif 44 mcg will be injected subcutaneously three times a week using Rebiject II self-injector device.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Subjects Rating Each Device as "Easy/Very Easy to Use" Based on User Trial Questionnaire (UTQ) at Week 4
Time Frame: Week 4
The UTQ is a tool used to assess the ease-of-use of a device by the subject. Subjects were asked to assess their overall experience with using the device as "very difficult", "difficult", "neither easy nor difficult", "easy", or "very easy". Percentage of subjects who rated the overall use of device as "easy" or "very easy" were reported. Here results are presented by device sequence.
Week 4
Percentage of Subjects Rating Each Device as "Easy/Very Easy to Use" Based on User Trial Questionnaire (UTQ) at Week 8
Time Frame: Week 8
The UTQ is a tool used to assess the ease-of-use of a device by the subject. Subjects were asked to assess their overall experience with using the device as "very difficult", "difficult", "neither easy nor difficult", "easy", or "very easy". Percentage of subjects who rated the overall use of device as "easy" or "very easy" were reported. Here results are presented by device sequence.
Week 8
Percentage of Subjects Rating Each Device as "Easy/Very Easy to Use" Based on User Trial Questionnaire (UTQ) up to Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 8
The UTQ is a tool used to assess the ease-of-use of a device by the subject. Subjects were asked to assess their overall experience with using the device as "very difficult", "difficult", "neither easy nor difficult", "easy", or "very easy". Percentage of subjects who rated the overall use of device as "easy" or "very easy" were reported. Here results are presented by device used.
Baseline up to Week 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Subjects Rating Each Device on Level of Satisfaction With Using the Device While Traveling Based on User Trial Questionnaire (UTQ)
Time Frame: Weeks 4 and 8
The UTQ is a tool used to assess the ease-of-use of a device by the subject. Subjects were asked to assess their level of satisfaction with using the device while traveling (defined as being away from home overnight). Subjects assessed if they were satisfied with their ability to use the device while traveling overnight as "Strongly disagree", "Disagree", "Neither agree nor disagree", "Agree", "Strongly agree". Here results are presented by device sequence.
Weeks 4 and 8
Percentage of Subjects Rating Each Device on Amount of Time Needed to Complete the Injection Based on User Trial Questionnaire (UTQ)
Time Frame: Weeks 4 and 8
The UTQ is a tool used to assess the ease-of-use of a device by the subject. Subjects were asked to assess their level of satisfaction with respect to the amount of time it took to complete injection with the device. Subjects assessed if they were satisfied as "Strongly disagree", "Disagree", "Neither agree nor disagree", "Agree", "Strongly agree". Here results are presented by device sequence.
Weeks 4 and 8
Percentage of Subjects Rating Each Device on Number of Steps Involved in Completing the Injection Based on User Trial Questionnaire (UTQ)
Time Frame: Weeks 4 and 8
The UTQ is a tool used to assess the ease-of-use of a device by the subject. Subjects were asked to assess their level of satisfaction with respect to number of steps it took to complete an injection with the device. Subjects assessed if they were satisfied as "Strongly disagree", "Disagree", "Neither agree nor disagree", "Agree", "Strongly agree". Here results are presented by device sequence.
Weeks 4 and 8
Percentage of Subjects Rating Each Device on Ease of Holding Based on User Trial Questionnaire (UTQ)
Time Frame: Weeks 4 and 8
The UTQ is a tool used to assess the ease-of-use of a device by the subject. Subjects were asked to assess their overall experience with holding the device as "very difficult", "difficult", "neither easy nor difficult", "easy", or "very easy". Here results are presented by device sequence.
Weeks 4 and 8
Number of Subjects Rating Each Device on Level of Satisfaction With Using the Device Away From Home Based on User Trial Questionnaire (UTQ)
Time Frame: Weeks 4 and 8
The UTQ is a tool used to assess the ease-of-use of a device by the subject. Subjects were asked to assess their level of satisfaction with using the device while away from home. Subjects assessed if they were satisfied with their ability to use the device while away from home as "Strongly disagree", "Disagree", "Neither agree nor disagree", "Agree", "Strongly agree". Here results are presented by device sequence.
Weeks 4 and 8
Percentage of Subjects Rating Each Device on Level of Convenience of Using the Device Based on User Trial Questionnaire (UTQ)
Time Frame: Weeks 4 and 8
The UTQ is a tool used to assess the ease-of-use of a device by the subject. Subjects were asked to assess their level of convenience of using the device as "Extremely inconvenient", "Somewhat inconvenient", "Neutral/no opinion", "Somewhat convenient", or "Extremely convenient". Here results are presented by device sequence.
Weeks 4 and 8
Percentage of Subjects Rating Each Device on Level of Convenience of Storing the Device Based on User Trial Questionnaire (UTQ)
Time Frame: Weeks 4 and 8
The UTQ is a tool used to assess the ease-of-use of a device by the subject. Subjects were asked to assess how convenient it was to store the injection device. Subjects responded as "Strongly disagree", "Disagree", "Neither agree nor disagree", "Agree", "Strongly agree" that the device was convenient to store.
Weeks 4 and 8
Percentage of Subjects Rating Each Device on Minimization of Safety Hazards Based on User Trial Questionnaire (UTQ)
Time Frame: Weeks 4 and 8
The UTQ is a tool used to assess the ease-of-use of a device by the subject. Subjects were asked to assess whether the device features help minimize safety hazards. Subjects responded as "Strongly disagree", "Disagree", "Neither agree nor disagree", "Agree", "Strongly agree". Here results are presented by device sequence.
Weeks 4 and 8
Percentage of Subjects Rating Each Device on Amount of Needle Anxiety While Using the Device Based on User Trial Questionnaire (UTQ)
Time Frame: Weeks 4 and 8
The UTQ is a tool used to assess the ease-of-use of a device by the subject. Subjects were asked to assess their level of anxiety while giving themselves an injection with device. Subjects assessed their anxiety as "Not at all anxious", "A little anxious", "Moderately anxious", "Very anxious", "Extremely anxious". Here results are presented by device sequence.
Weeks 4 and 8
Percentage of Subjects Rating Each Device on Level of Satisfaction With Information Provided by the Trainer Based on User Trial Questionnaire (UTQ)
Time Frame: Weeks 4 and 8
The UTQ is a tool used to assess the ease-of-use of a device by the subject. Subjects were asked to assess whether the trainer provided easily understandable, unbiased and practical information about proper injection. Subjects responded as "Strongly disagree", "Disagree", "Neither agree nor disagree", "Agree", "Strongly agree". Here results are presented by device sequence.
Weeks 4 and 8
Percentage of Subjects Rating Each Device on Likelihood of Recommending the Device to Others Based on User Trial Questionnaire (UTQ)
Time Frame: Weeks 4 and 8
The UTQ is a tool used to assess the ease-of-use of a device by the subject. Subjects were asked they would recommend injection device to others needing REBIF therapy. Subjects responded as "Very unlikely", "Unlikely", "Neutral/no opinion", "Likely", "Very likely". Here results are presented by device sequence.
Weeks 4 and 8
Percentage of Subjects Rating Each Device on Overall Satisfaction With the Injection Device Based on User Trial Questionnaire (UTQ)
Time Frame: Weeks 4 and 8
The UTQ is a tool used to assess the ease-of-use of a device by the subject. Subjects were asked to assess their overall satisfaction with using the device. Subjects responded as "Strongly disagree", "Disagree", "Neither agree nor disagree", "Agree", "Strongly agree" that they were satisfied with the device. Here results are presented by device sequence.
Weeks 4 and 8
Percentage of Subjects Rating Each Device on Ease of Use Based on User Trial Questionnaire (UTQ)
Time Frame: Weeks 4 and 8
The UTQ is a tool used to assess the ease-of-use of a device by the subject. Subjects were asked to assess their overall experience with using the device as "very difficult", "difficult", "neither easy nor difficult", "easy", or "very easy". Percentage of subjects who rated the overall use of device as very difficult", "difficult" or "neither easy nor difficult" were reported. Here results are presented by device sequence.
Weeks 4 and 8
Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life (MusiQoL) Scores to Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline, up to Week 8
The MusiQoL is a validated 31-item questionnaire describing 9 dimensions named according to its constitutive items:activities of daily living (8 items);psychological well-being (4 items);symptoms (3 items);friends relationships (4 items);family relationships (3 items);satisfaction with health care (RHCS 3 items);sentimental and sexual life (2 items);coping (2 items);and rejection (2 items). Each of the questions was answered using a 6-point Likert scale, defined as 1-Never/Not at all, 2-Rarely/A little, 3-Sometimes/Somewhat, 4-Often/A lot, 5-Always/Very much and 6-Not applicable. The scores of each dimension were obtained by computing mean of the item scores of dimension with negatively worded item scores reversed so that higher scores indicated higher health-related QoL. All 9 dimension scores were linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale,where higher score=higher health-related QoL. Global index score was computed as mean of the 9 dimension scores (range 0-100;higher score=higher QoL).
Baseline, up to Week 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

December 24, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 7, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2017

Last Verified

January 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting

Clinical Trials on Rebif Rebidose

Subscribe