Study Comparing 25d ProCor Needle Versus the Standard 25g Needle for Biopsies Performed by EUS-FNA

Prospective Study Comparing the Diagnostic Yield of Solid Lesion Biopsies Performed by EUS-FNA Using the 25d ProCor Needle Versus the Standard 25g Needle.

Background: There is an ongoing interest in developing Endoscopic Ultrasound /Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) needles that can provide tissue core biopsies for a true histological (rather than cytological) evaluation. By slightly modifying the traditional EUS-FNA needle, a new needle named "ProCor" was developed in the hope of obtaining core samples and thus increase diagnostic yield.

Objective: In this research project, we propose to conduct a prospective trial to compare the results obtained with two types of needles: a 25g standard needle (25gS) and the 25g ProCor needle (25gP).

EUS-FNA Biopsies will be obtained with both the 25S and 25P needles in each lesion; a randomisation sequence will set in order to determine which of the two needles will first be used (25S or 25P).

The cytological or histological diagnoses will be made; . for histological diagnosis, the pathologist will first establish the presence or absence of a tissue core (defined as a measurable cylinder of tissue). The pathologist will assess the adequacy of each specimen: cellularity (score 1 "poor"; score 2 "good"; score 3 "excellent"),[14] sample bloodiness (score 1 "minimal";score 2 "moderate"; score 3 "significant", and the presence or absence of malignancy("positive" / "negative" / "suspicious" / inconclusive).

Results for continuous variables will be summarized using mean ± SD, . and categorical variables using proportions. The 25S and 25P groups will be compared using Chi-square test for categorical variables and, Student t test for continuous variablesTwo-sided p values less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Data will be analyzed using SPSS v 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago IL) statistical software.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Objectives of the study

The primary objective is to compare the diagnostic yield of biopsies performed by EUS-FNA using the 25d ProCor needle versus the standard 25g needle.

The primary outcome is the diagnostic yield defined as: sensitivity for the presence of cancer based on the analysis of EUS-FNA samples.

The secondary objectives are:

  1. to compare the size of the "core" samples produced by the two types of needles.
  2. to compare the incidence and severity of immediate complications associated with the two types of needles

Methods

Design: This a prospective clinical study for the validation of a new instrument (ProCor biopsy needle) for application to clinical medicine, namely the diagnosis of cancer.

Endoscopic procedures:

Informed consent by the patient will be obtained before each procedure by a single research assistant.

All EUS examinations will be performed under conscious sedation (midazolam, fentanyl) by one two experienced endosonographers according to the standard procedures at the CHUM and using a linear echoendoscope. , If the lesion is considered solid and EUS-FNA is considered clinically indicated and safe, the patient will be enrolled and the randomisation envelope will be opened. EUS-FNA Biopsies will be obtained with both the 25S and 25P needles in each lesion; a randomisation sequence will set in order to determine which of the two needles will first be used (25S or 25P).

EUS-FNA passes will be performed without stylet. One "needle pass" is defined as 5 strokes in 4 different areas of the lesion. The material from the first 2 needle passes (one 25S and the other 25P) will be expressed into formalin to look for core samples. Material from the next 2 needle passes (again one 25S and the other 25P) will be expressed onto slides for cytological analysis. Ease of puncture will be scored qualitatively as poor (scored 1), good (scored 2) or excellent (scored 3).

Immediate complications will be assessed and recorded by nurses and/or physicians during the procedure as well after the procedure while the patients will be monitored in the recovery room for at least 60 minutes before discharge.

The areas which will be investigated by biopsy will be the pancreas, the retroperitoneal and/or the mediastinal lymph nodes.

Cytological and Histological analyses:

Samples from all needle passes will be stained using a standard Papanicolaou stain and analyzed by one experienced pathologist who will be blinded as to needle type. The cytological or histological diagnoses will be made; . for histological diagnosis, the pathologist will first establish the presence or absence of a tissue core (defined as a measurable cylinder of tissue). The pathologist will assess the adequacy of each specimen: cellularity (score 1 "poor"; score 2 "good"; score 3 "excellent"),[14] sample bloodiness (score 1 "minimal";score 2 "moderate"; score 3 "significant", and the presence or absence of malignancy("positive" / "negative" / "suspicious" / inconclusive).

Diagnostic yield Diagnostic yield is defined as sensitivity for the presence of cancer based on the analysis of EUS-FNA samples. The gold standard will be the presence of cancer as defined on the basis of at least one of the following two criteria: positive cytological or histological results and malignant disease after clinical follow up (clinical worsening and radiologic evidence of progression within the 6 months following FNA).

Data collection

Clinical data will be collected prospectively and saved in a database. In addition to demographics, these will include:

  • size and location (pancreas, lymph node, liver, adrenal gland, others) of the target lesion
  • technical and procedure variables ( FNA path, , number of needle passes, needle visibility, ease to puncture, needle failure, cellularity, bloodiness)
  • cytological diagnosis
  • final diagnosis
  • immediate complications. Research data and project-related documents will be preserved during 15 year after the end of the study.

Statistical analysis Results for continuous variables will be summarized using mean ± (Standard Deviation) SD, . and categorical variables using proportions. The 25S and 25P groups will be compared using Chi-square test for categorical variables and, Student t test for continuous variablesTwo-sided p values less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Data will be analyzed using SPSS v 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago IL) statistical software.

Sample size The sample size is calculated as a study of non-inferiority. Assuming a sensitivity for cancer of 85% for the 25S needle and a difference of sensitivity of 15% as clinically significant, a sample size of 112 patients per group would be needed (α = 0.05 and β = 0.2). Since we perform approximately 400 EUS-FNA biopsies for solid lesions annually,. it is expected that this study could be completed within approximately 6 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

224

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2X3J4
        • Hopital Saint Luc (Centre Hopitalier de l´Université du Montreal)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: ≥ 18 years old
  • Patients presenting with a solid lesion
  • Patients for whom EUS-FNA is considered clinically indicated and safe

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 years old,
  • Patients with suspected diagnosis of lymphoma, GIST, sarcoidosis or other lesions in which a large amount of tissue will be required for diagnosis,
  • Patients with significant coagulopathy (INR>1.5, platelets <50000/mm3, use of low molecular weight heparin, use of clopidogrel within 7 days of EUS), Patients presenting with cystic lesions Inability or refusal to sign the informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 25g standard needle
EUS-FNA passes will be performed without stylet. One "needle pass" is defined as 5 strokes in 4 different areas of the lesion. The material from the needle passes will be expressed into formalin to look for core samples. Material from the next needle passes will be expressed onto slides for cytological analysis. Ease of puncture will be scored qualitatively as poor (scored 1), good (scored 2) or excellent (scored 3).
Other Names:
  • Evaluation of core samples
  • Cytological analysis
  • Ease of puncture
Experimental: 25d ProCor needle
EUS-FNA passes will be performed without stylet. One "needle pass" is defined as 5 strokes in 4 different areas of the lesion. The material from the needle passes will be expressed into formalin to look for core samples. Material from the next needle passes will be expressed onto slides for cytological analysis. Ease of puncture will be scored qualitatively as poor (scored 1), good (scored 2) or excellent (scored 3).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Compare the diagnostic yield of biopsies performed EUS-FNA by using the 25d ProCor needle versus the standard 25g needle
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measurement of the size of the "core" samples produced by the two types of needles
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day
Measurement of incidence and severity of immediate complications associated with the two types of needles
Time Frame: 1 day
Immediate complications will be assessed and recorded by nurses and/or physicians during and after the procedure while the patient was recovering from sedation.
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anand V Sahai, MD, Hopital Saint Luc (Centre Hopitalier de l´Université du Montreal) Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 9, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

January 29, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 10, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Solid Lesion Biopsies

Clinical Trials on 25g standard needle

Subscribe