Vitamin D in Pediatric Asthma: a Randomized Controlled Open-label Pilot Trial (D-Asthma)

October 7, 2015 updated by: Barbara Gracious, Nationwide Children's Hospital

Prospective Open Pilot of Low vs. Higher Dose Vitamin D in D-deficient Asthmatic Children: Does Diet Predict Immune Function and Asthma Symptom Response to Vitamin D Supplementation?

This is a pilot randomized controlled trial of lower vs. higher dose vitamin D supplementation in D-deficient asthmatic children, to determine necessary sample sizes for outcome measures in a larger multisite study, and to examine possible relationships and effect sizes between various biological markers that may be important to the pathophysiology of childhood asthma.

Aims of the study are to:

  1. Evaluate effect sizes for relationships between serum 25OH-vitD and omega-fatty acid (FA) biomarkers, before and after supplementation with lower or higher dose vitamin D, on immune function, and asthma severity.
  2. Characterize changes in innate and adaptive immune function and inflammatory responses in asthmatic D-deficient youth at baseline and after vitD supplements, by dietary O6:O3FA status and vitD dose.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

An estimated up to 120 youth meeting eligibility criteria will be screened for vitamin D deficiency, and if found deficient, will be offered enrollment in this study.

Eligible children who assent and whose parent/guardian consent to participate will be randomized to low dose vs. higher dose vitamin D to take across a 3-month period of time. Blood, questionnaires, and pulmonary function tests will be obtained at baseline and end of study. Weekly phone calls will check on any questions or concerns the participant or their family may have.

Aims and Hypotheses:

Aim I: Evaluate effect sizes for relationships between omega-FA and vitD biomarkers, pre- and post- low and higher dose vitamin D supplementation, in diet, immune function, and asthma severity.

Aim II: Characterize changes in innate and adaptive immune function and inflammatory responses in asthmatic D-deficient youth at baseline and after vitD supplements, by O6:O3FA status and vitD dose.

Exploratory: Compute effect sizes/odds ratios for differences in pulmonary function, self-reported asthma severity, depressive symptoms, hospitalization/ED visits, and medication changes based on treatment group.

Effect sizes will be calculated for all continuous outcome variables by:

Effect Size (ES) = Average of the post-test scores - Average of the pre-test scores Average standard deviation

Odds ratios for the categorical asthma severity variable will be computed through logistic regression by treatment group with no covariates.

Examine differences in pulmonary function tests, self-reported asthma severity, depressive symptoms, hospitalization/ED visits, and medication changes based on treatment group. Omega fatty acid intake and allergic status will be included as potentially mediating variables.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Nationwide Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Informed consent and assent signed and dated before participation.
  • 2. Male or female, ages 8 through 17 at baseline; all races and ethnicities
  • 3. asthma and currently taking a prescribed daily inhaled steroid asthma medication
  • 4. English-speaking with at least one English-speaking parent
  • 5. vitamin D deficiency (<20 ng/mL)
  • 6. compliant with attending at least 2/4 of their last asthma-related scheduled clinic visits

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. If female, pregnant, planning to become pregnant, and/or sexually active and not using reliable contraception
  • 2. Unable to provide informed consent (mental retardation, etc)
  • 3. Current substance dependence (within the past 2 months)
  • 4. Known metabolic bone disease, including rickets
  • 5. Known malabsorption disease: Crohn's, ulcerative colitis, celiac sprue
  • 6. BMI>40
  • 7. Has begun new treatment with vitamin D (>600 IU/day) within the past month
  • 8. Treatment with prednisone or other oral or IV steroid within the past 4 weeks
  • 9. Taking mineral oil or thiazide diuretics on a daily basis
  • 10. Acute or chronic liver, renal, endocrine, neurologic, infectious, autoimmune, cardiac, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, hematologic, metabolic disorder or any other disorder, per study physician judgment.
  • 11. Severe treatment noncompliance documented in medical record or by managing provider report.

Our definition of a highly effective method of birth control is consistent with ICH Guidance for Industry M3 Nonclinical Safety Studies for the Conduct of Human Clinical Trials for Pharmaceuticals (April 1997) when used consistently and correctly, such as implants, injectables, oral contraceptives, some intrauterine devices (IUDs), sexual abstinence, or a vasectomized partner. Subjects will also be reminded to use condoms to prevent sexually transmitted diseases and as a second method toward birth control.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: vitamin D2 + vitamin D3
Vitamin D2 50,000 IU each week x 4 + vitamin D3 4,000 IU each day for 3 months
higher dose vitamin D
Other Names:
  • Vitamin D2 50,000 IU by mouth once per week x 4 weeks
  • Vitamin D3 4,000 IU by mouth once each day
Active Comparator: Vitamin D lower dose
800 IU vitamin D3 by mouth each day for 3 months
lower dose vitamin D
Other Names:
  • Vitamin D3 800 IU by mouth each day for 3 months

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
vitamin D levels
Time Frame: change in serum vitamin D level from baseline to 12 weeks

Primary:

1. 25-OH vitamin D (D2, D3): 1.0 ml sample sent to Esoterix Laboratory Services (Austin, TX) through NCH and run via high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC), Tandem Mass Spectrometry analysis. Samples processed individually, not batched, for intervention study purposes.

change in serum vitamin D level from baseline to 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Side Effects Form for Children and Adolescents (SEFCA)
Time Frame: Baseline, end of week 12
structured interviewer-administered questionnaire inquiring about body systems health and concerns
Baseline, end of week 12
Block Kids 2004 Food Frequency Questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline, and end of week 12
a questionnaire inquiring how often children eat particular items from different food groups
baseline, and end of week 12
immune status
Time Frame: baseline, and end of week 12
key pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines as well as T-cell ratios will be compared before and after vitamin D supplementation
baseline, and end of week 12

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
asthma severity
Time Frame: baseline, and end of week 12
via pulmonary function tests
baseline, and end of week 12
quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline, and end of week 12
pediatric quality of life questionnaire, including questions about asthma
Baseline, and end of week 12
omega fatty acid profile
Time Frame: Baseline, and end of week 12
red blood cells will be analyzed for omega fatty acid percentages and ratios of omega 3 fatty acids will be compared to omega 6 fatty acids.
Baseline, and end of week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Barbara L Gracious, MD, Nationwide Children's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2015

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

February 4, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 8, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2015

Last Verified

October 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vitamin D Deficiency

Clinical Trials on Vitamin D2 + vitamin D3

3
Subscribe