3-Tesla MRI Response to TACE in HCC (Liver Cancer)

July 10, 2018 updated by: David Lee Gorden, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center

Multi-Parametric 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of Response to Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)

This pilot clinical trial examines how well different imaging biomarkers acquired using 3-Telsa magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods perform in determining treatment response to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Compared to conventional imaging, multi-parametric 3-Tesla MRI offers the ability to quantitatively measure tissue structural, functional, cellular, and molecular properties, providing a more robust, clinically relevant method for assessing cancer response to therapy.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
        • Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects must have signed an institutional review board (IRB)-approved informed consent document
  • Subjects must have verified unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), diagnosed on the basis of clinical and imaging criteria
  • Subjects must be classified as TNM stage I, II, or III; alternatively, subjects may be classified as Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A or B
  • Subjects must be scheduled to undergo transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)
  • Subjects must have at least 1 lesion being targeted by TACE that is > 2 cm in the longest cross-sectional (axial plane) diameter
  • Subjects must satisfy one of the following conditions pertaining to their eligibility to undergo orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT):

    • HCC that is within Milan Criteria, i.e., TACE is indicated as a "bridge" to OLT (Group I); or
    • HCC that is outside Milan Criteria, i.e., TACE is indicated as a means of "down-staging" into transplant eligibility (Group II)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who have received prior treatment for HCC (prior surgical procedures not related to HCC are allowed)
  • Subjects who have undergone prior radioembolization
  • Subjects with a central venous line
  • Subjects who have any type of biomedical implant, device and/or ferromagnetic material that can be displaced, perturbed, or otherwise malfunction due to mechanical, electronic, or magnetic means; these items may include:

    • Metallic fragments or shrapnel (such as from war wounds)
    • Cerebral aneurysm clips, biopsy marker clips
    • Vascular access ports (as are used with intravenous chemotherapy)
    • Cochlear implants, pacemakers, neurostimulators, biostimulators, and electronic infusion pumps **Implanted materials other than those verified as being rated "magnetic resonance [MR] Safe" or "MR Conditional 6" will not be allowed on study
  • Creatinine >= 1.5 times upper limit of normal
  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/min
  • Subjects who are pregnant or nursing
  • Subjects who have had past allergic or other adverse reactions to intravenous injection of Magnevist® (gadopentetate dimeglumine) or other gadolinium-containing contrast agents
  • Subjects who exhibit noticeable anxiety, claustrophobia, or vertigo when moved into the scanner
  • Subjects incapable of giving informed written consent, for the following reasons:

    • Inability to adhere to the experimental protocols for any reason
    • Inability to communicate with the research team
    • Mental disability, altered mental status, confusion, or psychiatric disorders
    • Prisoners or others susceptible to coercion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Diagnostic (3T MRI)
Patients undergo 3T MRI at baseline (=< 2 weeks before TACE) and at 2-4 weeks, 4-8 weeks, and 12 weeks after TACE. Each 3T MRI session will utilize a sequence of the following modalities: CEST-MRI, MT-MRI, DW-MRI, and DCE-MRI.
3T MRI consists of a series of radiofrequency (RF) pulse sequences optimized for acquiring CEST-, MT-, DW-, and DCE-MRI data in one seamless imaging examination. For DCE, MR contrast agent will be intravenously administered.
Other Names:
  • 3 Tesla MRI, 3T MRI (Philips Achieva), multi-parametric imaging
For the acquisition of DCE-MR data, the FDA-approved contrast agent Magnevist® (gadopentetate dimeglumine, 0.1 mmol/kg) will be delivered intravenously by the MR technologist at a rate of 2 mL/sec (followed by a saline flush) via a power injector after the acquisition of a set of baseline dynamic scans. The entire sequence lasts approximately 8 minutes.
Other Names:
  • intravenous (IV) injection of Magnevist® (gadopentetate dimeglumine); IV contrast infusion; IV gadolinium (Gd)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation of Changes in Imaging Biomarkers (Ktrans, ADC, MTR, and APTasym) as Measured by DCE-, DW-, MT-, and CEST-MRI at 3 Tesla, Respectively, With Changes in Tumor Volume (mRECIST).
Time Frame: Baseline to up to 12 weeks post-TACE
The following will be longitudinally measured using 3 Tesla (3T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prior to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and 2-4, 4-8, and 12 weeks following TACE: 1) the volume transfer coefficient (Ktrans), measured by dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI; 2) the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), measured by diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI; 3) the magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), measured by magnetization transfer (MT) MRI; and 4) the amide proton transfer asymmetry (APTasym), measured by chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI. We will use a general linear model (GLM) approach to measure the association between changes in each of the above imaging metrics (relative to pretreatment baseline) and changes in tumor volume (according to standard-of-care modified RECIST) at 3 or 6 month follow-up, accounting for the effect of potential confounders, e.g., age and size of the tumor at baseline.
Baseline to up to 12 weeks post-TACE

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation of Changes in Ktrans, ADC, MTR, and APTasym (Measured by DCE-, DW-, MT-, and CEST-MRI at 3 Tesla, Respectively) With Time-to-progression (TTP).
Time Frame: Baseline to up to 6 months post-TACE
Proportional hazard model will be employed to assess the ability of the longitudinal change (relative to pretreatment baseline) in each of the 3T MR imaging metrics (Ktrans, ADC, MTR, and APTasym) to predict patient survival outcomes, time-to-progression (TTP) and progression-free survival (PFS) as well as overall survival (OS). The calibration of prediction will be validated by computing the difference between predicted survival and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates at a fixed time, which estimates the over-optimism of the difference using bootstrapping.
Baseline to up to 6 months post-TACE
Correlation of Changes in Ktrans, ADC, MTR, and APTasym (Measured by DCE-, DW-, MT-, and CEST-MRI at 3 Tesla, Respectively) With Changes in the Ratio of Viable-to-necrotic Tumor Volume
Time Frame: Baseline to up to 12 weeks post-TACE
Longitudinal changes in 3T MRI-derived measures and the change in the ratio of viable vs. necrotic tumor will be assessed by using a GLM approach in which the underlying temporal correlation can be modeled via an autoregressive order one (AR(1)) structure, validated by computing Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) against the other common structures, e.g., unstructured and constant correlation.
Baseline to up to 12 weeks post-TACE
Correlation of Ktrans, ADC, MTR, and APTasym (Measured by DCE-, DW-, MT-, and CEST-MRI at 3 Tesla, Respectively) With Pathological Response Within Explanted Tissue Following Orthotopic Liver Transplant (OLT)
Time Frame: Subset of patients undergoing OLT: within 12 hours following surgery
Histopathological features on explanted livers following OLT, including percentage necrosis and cellular density as determined by hematoxylin and eosin staining, as well as the extent of fibrosis as determined by collagen staining, will be assessed for correspondence with findings on ex vivo 3T MRI.
Subset of patients undergoing OLT: within 12 hours following surgery
Correlation of Changes in Ktrans, ADC, MTR, and APTasym (Measured by DCE-, DW-, MT-, and CEST-MRI at 3 Tesla, Respectively) With Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: Baseline to up to 6 months post-TACE
Proportional hazard model will be employed to assess the ability of the longitudinal change (relative to pretreatment baseline) in each of the 3T MR imaging metrics (Ktrans, ADC, MTR, and APTasym) to predict patient survival outcomes, time-to-progression (TTP) and progression-free survival (PFS) as well as overall survival (OS). The calibration of prediction will be validated by computing the difference between predicted survival and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates at a fixed time, which estimates the over-optimism of the difference using bootstrapping.
Baseline to up to 6 months post-TACE

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David L Gorden, MD, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 19, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 4, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 5, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

February 7, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Advanced Adult Primary Liver Cancer

Clinical Trials on 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Subscribe