Clinical Trial of Prostatic Arterial Embolization Versus a Sham Procedure to Treat Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

February 13, 2020 updated by: João Martins Pisco

Randomized, Evaluator-blind, Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Prostatic Arterial Embolization Versus a Sham Procedure for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Severe LUTS Not Adequately Controlled With Alpha-blockers

The purpose of this study is to determine whether prostatic arterial embolization (PAE) compared is an effective and safe treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients with severe lower urinary tract symptoms not adequately controlled by medical therapy with alpha-blockers, as assessed by the the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) after 6 months. Patients will be randomized on a 1:1 ratio to PAE or to a sham procedure and evaluated at 1, 3 and 6 months. Patients randomized to the sham procedure will be offered the possibility of performing PAE after 6 months. All patients may participate on an optional 6-months extension study.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a randomized, parallel-group, evaluator-blind, superiority, controlled clinical trial of PAE versus a sham procedure in patients with BPH with severe LUTS not adequately controlled by medical therapy with alpha-blockers.

This study has a screening visit at day -14, a baseline visit at day -2, a randomization and intervention visit at day 0, follow up visits at months 1, 3 and 6.

Patients initially randomized to the sham procedure and who completed the 6 month follow-up period will be offered the possibility of performing PAE at no cost. All patients will be invited to participate in a 6 months post-trial extension study.

Patients over 45 years-old with a diagnosis of BPH associated with severe LUTS defined by an IPSS>=20 after a minimum of 6 months treatment with alpha-blockers and with a prostate volume ≥ 40 mL will start a two weeks screening period. Eligible patients will be started either tamsulosin 0.4 mg q.d., alfuzosin 10 mg q.d. or silodosin 8 mg q.d., which will be maintained throughout the study period, and have the intervention scheduled for the following 2 days (study day 0), when they will be randomized to PAE or to a sham procedure if the procedure is technically feasible

Those patients in whom angiography has shown that PAE is technically feasible will be randomized to one of the study arms on a 1:1 ratio. Patients in both groups will be submitted to exactly the same procedure, except that patients randomized to the control group will not be injected with polyvinyl alcohol particles. Patients will be discharged as soon as their clinical condition is stabilized

Patients will be assessed at 1, 3 and 6 months with IPSS, QoL, IIEF, BPH-II and will perform prostatic ultrasonography, uroflowmetry and PSA at month 1 and 6. At 1 month a pelvic NMR will be performed to evaluate prostate volume and the degree of ischemia.

Patients completing the 6 month follow-up period will be invited to enter a 6 months extension study. In this extension study, patients will be evaluated at month 12 for all efficacy variables. Patients initially randomized to the sham procedure who wanted to perform PAE after the conclusion of the trial will be evaluated only at months 1, 3 and 6 after PAE.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lisboa, Portugal, 1200-249 Lisboa
        • Hospital de Saint Louis

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male patients ≥ 45 years-old
  • Diagnosis of BPH based on clinical history, digital rectal examination, urine sediment, transrectal prostate ultrasound and PSA
  • Use of a marketed alpha-blocker for LUTS/BPH in the previous 6 months
  • Severe lower urinary tract symptoms at screening and baseline defined by all the following: IPSS (7 items) ≥ 20, QoL ≥ 3, Qmax < 12 mL/s and prostate volume ≥ 40 mL
  • CTA shows that prostatic arteries are feasible for PAE
  • Sexual dysfunction or accepting the risk of developing sexual dysfunction after treatment
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous surgical or invasive prostate treatments such as TURP, TUMT, TUNA, laser or any other minimally invasive treatment
  • Acute or chronic prostatitis or suspected prostatitis including chronic pain, intermittent pain or abnormal sensation in the penis, testis, anal or pelvic area in the past 12 months
  • History of prostate or bladder cancer or pelvic irradiation
  • Active or recurrent urinary tract infections (more than 1 episode in the last 12 months)
  • History of neurogenic bladder or LUTS secondary to neurological disease
  • Advanced atherosclerosis and tortuosity of iliac and prostatic arteries
  • Secondary renal insufficiency (due to prostatic obstruction)
  • Large bladder diverticula or stones
  • Detrusor failure
  • Previous history of acute urinary retention
  • Current severe, significant or uncontrolled disease (including, but not limited to metabolic, hematologic, renal, hepatic, pulmonary, neurologic, endocrine, cardiac, infectious or gastrointestinal, uncontrolled hypertension (systolic ≥ 160 mmHg and/or diastolic ≥95 mmHg), congestive heart failure [New York Heart Association status of class III or IV], myocardial infarction within 26 weeks prior to randomization), which in the judgment of the clinical investigator renders the subject unsuitable for the trial and puts the subject at increased risk
  • Any bleeding disorder such as hemophilia, clotting factor deficiency, anti-coagulation or bleeding diathesis
  • Hypersensitivity or contraindication to tamsulosin use
  • Administration of 5-ARIs, finasteride and dutasteride in the previous 2 weeks and 4 months, respectively. These patients may be included if they stop those medications and replace them for tansulosin, alfuzosin or silodosin for at least 2 weeks and 4 months, respectively.
  • Any mental condition or disorder that would interfere with the subject's ability to provide informed consent
  • Participation in a study of any investigational drug or device in the previous 3 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Prostatic Arterial Embolization
Selective catheterization of the prostatic arteries followed by slow injection of Bead Block 300-500 or PVA 100+200 micra particles under fluoroscopic control.
The prostatic arteries are selectively catheterized with a Progreat 2.7 microcatheter and an angiography is performed to confirm that the catheter is in the prostatic artery. Bead Block 300-500 or PVA 100+200 micra particles are slowly injected under fluoroscopic control until the end point is reached. Embolization is considered finished when there is "near stasis" in the prostatic vessels with interruption of the arterial flow and prostatic gland opacification checked in both oblique and AP views. Upon finishing the embolization of the left prostatic arteries, the right prostatic arteries are embolized in the same way.
Sham Comparator: Sham procedure
Selective catheterization of the prostatic arteries followed by removal of the catheter with no particles injected.
The prostatic arteries are selectively catheterized with a Progreat 2.7 microcatheter and an angiography is performed to confirm that the catheter is in the prostatic artery. The catheter is removed and no particles are injected.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score
Time Frame: 6 months
The difference between the baseline value and the value observed at the last valid observation of a validated questionnaire that measures the disconfort caused by lowere urinary tract symptoms
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disease specific quality of life question of the International Prostate Symptom Score
Time Frame: 6 months
The score of a question on the IPSS questionnare that measures quality of life in subjects with lower urinary tract symptoms at the last valid observation in each subject
6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in the Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index (BPH-II)
Time Frame: 6 months
The difference between the baseline value and the value observed at the last valid observation on a validated questionnaire that measures the disconfort caused by lowere urinary tract symptoms
6 months
Change from baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)
Time Frame: 6 months
The difference between the baseline value and the value observed at the last valid observation on a validated questionnaire that measures the severity of erectile disfunction
6 months
Change from baseline in the peak urinary flow rate (Qmax)
Time Frame: 6 months
The difference between the baseline value and the value observed at the last valid observation of the maximum flow rate of the urinary stream by uroflowmetry
6 months
Change from baseline in the post-void residual volume
Time Frame: 6 months
TThe difference between the baseline value and the value observed at the last valid observation of he volume of urine in the bladder after a complete voiding assessed by uroflowmetry
6 months
Change from baseline in prostate volume
Time Frame: 6 months
The difference between the baseline value and the value observed at the last valid observation of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasonography
6 months
Change from baseline in the Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)
Time Frame: 6 months
The difference between the baseline value and the value observed at the last valid observation of PSA.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: João M Pisco, M.D,. Ph.D., Hospital de Saint Louis

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 2, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 3, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

March 3, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

February 28, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Deidentified participant data and data dictionary of all the study data.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

From January 2020

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Deidentified participant data and data dictionary will be made available upon request to oliveira.amg@gmail.com with the submission of a study protocol and subsequent approval by the Research Ethics Committee of the institution where the trial was conducted.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Clinical Trials on Prostatic Arterial Embolization

Subscribe