Nonmyeloablative Conditioning and Transplantation for Patients With Refractory Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)

A Phase I/II Study of Nonmyeloablative Conditioning and Transplantation of Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)-Matched, Partially HLA-mismatched, HLA-haploidentical or Matched Unrelated Bone Marrow for Patients With Refractory SLE

The main goal of the study is to determine if bone marrow transplant (BMT) from a less specific pool of donors in combination with high dose cyclophosphamide can induce remission of refractory systemic lupus erythematosus.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a devastating systemic autoimmune disease that predominantly affects young women, is more common in African-Americans than in whites, and results in poor quality of life. Lupus has no cure, and up to 90% of patients require corticosteroids for disease control. More than half of patients with lupus have permanent organ damage, much of which is either directly due to or increased by corticosteroids. To satisfactorily manage moderate-to-severe SLE, the investigators need effective treatments that will allow corticosteroid-sparing.

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous BMT or peripheral blood progenitor transplantation (PBSCT) has been proposed as a novel approach to treat severe autoimmune diseases. Allogeneic BMT is not currently utilized for the routine treatment of SLE because of the significant morbidity (GVHD) and mortality associated with the procedure.

The investigators have recently developed an approach to BMT using post-transplant cyclophosphamide that allows us to safely perform allogeneic BMT from matched, mismatched, unrelated or haploidentical donors. Transplant-related mortality, graft-failure and risk of GVHD have been very low with this approach. Furthermore, this approach allows us to greatly expand the donor pool since any patient shares exactly one HLA haplotype with each biological parent or child and half of siblings, an eligible haploidentical donor can be identified rapidly in nearly all cases.

This trial will employ a fludarabine + cyclophosphamide conditioning along with posttransplantation cyclophosphamide on for patients with refractory SLE. The purpose of this trial is to improve the salvage rate for patients with refractory SLE through a reformatting of the immune system.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21205
        • Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Four or more American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for the classification of SLE or 4 or more of the SLICE criteria
  • Involvement of one or more of the following organ systems: renal, neurologic, hematologic, cardiac, pulmonary, gastrointestinal
  • A lack of response to corticosteroids in moderate-to-high doses, and to either an equivalent degree of immunosuppression with azathioprine, methotrexate, cyclosporin, tacrolimus, belimumab, rituximab, mycophenolate mofetil, and/or appropriate other treatment
  • Patients should be eligible for transplantation according to the BMT Policy Manual

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age less than 18 years and over 75 years
  • Any risk of pregnancy
  • Patients who are preterminal or moribund

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Nonmyeloablative Conditioning and BMT
Nonmyeloablative conditioning with rabbit antithymocyte globulin, cyclophosphamide, fludarabine, and total body irradiation. Allogeneic bone marrow transplant on Day 0. Graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus.
14.5 mg/kg/day on Days -6 and -5. 50 mg/kg/day on Days 3 and 4.
Other Names:
  • Cytoxan
  • Cy
30 mg/m^2/day on Days -6 through -2.
Other Names:
  • Fludara
Starting on Day 5. Dose will be adjusted according to blood levels.
Other Names:
  • Prograf
  • FK-506
15 mg/kg three times per day from Day 5 to Day 35.
Other Names:
  • Cellcept
  • MMF
0.5 mg/kg on Day -9. 2 mg/kg/day on Days -8 and -7.
Other Names:
  • Thymoglobulin
200 centigray on Day -1.
Infusion on Day 0.
Other Names:
  • BMT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Feasibility of the Conditioning Regimen and Post Transplantation Cyclophosphamide in Refractory SLE Patients With Donors Having Various Degrees of Matching
Time Frame: 1 year
Number of participants who were alive at 1 year after transplant and who had not suffered graft rejection, acute or chronic GVHD, or Grade 3 or higher (CTCAE V4.0) adverse events.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
RIFLE Score
Time Frame: 1 year

Change in Responder Index for Systemic Lupus Erythematosis (RIFLE) assessment. This is a qualitative assessment of organ function. The 12 month response will be assessed as:

complete= complete or partial resolution in more than one organ, partial= complete or partial resolution in at least one organ, the same= no change or no worsening in any organ, worse= worsening in any organ

1 year
Survival
Time Frame: 1 year
Number of patients alive and alive without relapse, respectively.
1 year
Graft Failure
Time Frame: 60 days
Number of participants with primary and/or secondary graft failure.
60 days
Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
Percentage of participants who developed grades II-IV and grades III-IV acute GVHD. Acute GVHD is defined by the Przepiorka criteria, which stages the degree of organ involvement in the skin, liver, and gastrointestinal (GI) tract, based on severity, with Stage 1+ being least severe and stage 4+ being the most severe. Grading of acute GVHD is as follows: Grade I (skin involvement stages 1+ to 2+, with no liver or GI involvement), Grade II (skin involvement stages 1+ to 3+, liver 1+, GI tract 1+), Grade III (skin involvement stages 2+ to 3+, liver 1+, GI tract 2+ to 4+), Grade IV (skin involvement stages 4+, Liver 4+).
Up to 2 years
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
Time Frame: Up to 2 years

Percentage of participants who developed chronic GVHD as defined by the NIH consensus criteria. This system gives scores from 0 to 3 for Karnofsky performance score, skin, mouth, eyes, gastrointestinal, liver, lungs, joints, and genitals, as well as an overall severity (mild, moderate, or severe).

Mild chronic GVHD involves only 1 or 2 organs or sites (except the lung), with no clinically significant functional impairment (maximum of score 1 in all affected organs or sites).

Moderate chronic GVHD involves 1) at least 1 organ or site with clinically significant but no major disability (maximum score of 2 in any affected organ or site) OR 2) 3 or more organs or sites with no clinically significant functional impairment (maximum score of 1 in all affected organs or sites).

Severe chronic GVHD indicates major disability caused by chronic GVHD (score of 3 in any organ or site).

Up to 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Javier Bolaños-Meade, MD, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 13, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 28, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 29, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 28, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2014

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 6, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 2, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lupus Erythematosus

Clinical Trials on Cyclophosphamide

3
Subscribe