PET-MRI in Diagnosing Patients With Cancer, Cardiac Diseases, or Neurologic Diseases

October 11, 2019 updated by: Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

PET-MRI: Evaluation, Optimization and Clinical Implementation

This randomized pilot clinical trial studies how well positron emission tomography (PET)-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) works compared to standard-of-care PET-computed tomography (CT) in diagnosing patients with cancer, cardiac diseases, or neurologic diseases. PET-MRI combines two imaging methods that can be used to evaluate disease. PET-MRI is similar to standard-of-care PET-CT, but exposes the patient to less radiation. It is not yet known whether PET-MRI produces better image quality than PET-CT in diagnosing patients with cancer, cardiac disease, or neurologic disease.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To assess and optimize image quality of PET and MRI focusing on technical artifacts and their correction.

II. To assess the accuracy of PET quantification based on MR attenuation correction (MRAC) derived from various MRI sequences and reconstruction algorithms including the effect of routinely used Gadolinium-based contrast agents on MRAC.

III. To determine the clinical and diagnostic accuracy of PET-MRI in comparison to standard-of-care diagnostic imaging.

IV. To assess the efficacy and workflow in combining PET and MRI in one single examination as compared to separate imaging studies.

V. To assess the potential for radiation dose reduction if PET-CT is substituted by PET-MRI, thus avoiding the radiation exposure from the CT-component.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

72

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106-5065
        • Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically indicated PET/PET-CT (with or without clinically indicated diagnostic MRI)
  • Presenting with one of the four conditions specified below

    • Fludeoxyglucose F 18 (FDG) avid cancers
    • Cardiac disease (cardiac viability assessment)
    • Neurologic disorders (dementia)
    • Inflammatory disease (for example fever of unknown origin, vasculitis, osteomyelitis)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy and lactation
  • Contraindications to undergo MRI
  • Cardiac pacemaker and metal devices (as specified in a separate MRI Informed consent)
  • Claustrophobia or inability to tolerate MRI examination (lay still for approximately 1 hour and hold breath intermittently)
  • Previously known allergies against MRI contrast agents (exclusion criterion only for contrast enhanced MRI)
  • Renal insufficiency: glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 40ml/min/1.73m^2 and following European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines (exclusion criterion only for contrast enhanced MRI)
  • Individuals who are not willing or capable of giving informed consent or assent (with legal guardian consent)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PET-CT and PET-MRI
Patients undergo PET-CT over approximately 30 minutes and PET-MRI over approximately 45-90 minutes.
Undergo PET
Other Names:
  • PET
  • FDG-PET
  • PET scan
  • tomography, emission computed
Undergo CT
Other Names:
  • CT
  • tomography, computed
Undergo MRI
Other Names:
  • MRI
  • NMRI
  • nuclear magnetic resonance imaging
  • NMR imaging

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Image Quality Scores
Time Frame: Day 1
Overall image quality scores obtained from the two imaging modalities will be compared with the hypothesis that hybrid PET-MRI images is as good as PET-CT images or superior (not inferior) to the PET-CT images. Evaluation of overall image quality will be assessed using the following criteria: 1=excellent, 2=good, 3=acceptable, 4=poor, 5=not acceptable. A Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) rank-sum test with a 0.100 significance level will be used.
Day 1
Lesion Based Standard Uptake Values (SUV)
Time Frame: Day 1
Lesion based SUV will be estimated and compared for PET-MR and PET-CT images in normal organs and compared. A two-sided two-sample t-test will be used to show significance of difference.
Day 1
Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve
Time Frame: Day 1
A two-sided z-test will be used to detect the difference in the area under the curve showing the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values as well as accuracy of diagnostic information.
Day 1
Time Effort Associated With the PET-MRI Versus PET-CT With MRI
Time Frame: Day 1
Statistical difference in time between PET-MRI versus sequential approach for PET-CT plus MRI. Workflow with shortest timely efforts and sufficient diagnostic information will be established as routine procedure.
Day 1
Radiation Dose Reduction With PET-MRI
Time Frame: Day 1
Dose measurements will be used to calculate effective radiation dose in each patient. Dose calculations of effective dose will be used to estimate dose savings in omitting the CT component of PET-CT. Statistical tests will use a 0.10 significance level and will be 2-sided
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pablo Ros, MD, MPH, PhD, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 7, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 14, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

October 2, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

March 11, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 29, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CASE16Z12 (Other Identifier: Case Comprehensive Cancer Center)
  • P30CA043703 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • NCI-2014-00376 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vasculitis

Clinical Trials on positron emission tomography

3
Subscribe