Pocket Phantom Tool in Improving Accuracy of Quantitative PET/CT Imaging of Patients With Solid Tumors

September 23, 2019 updated by: University of Washington

Calibrated Methods for Quantitative PET/CT Imaging Phase II

This pilot study tests the pocket phantom tool in improving the accuracy of quantitative positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging of patients with solid tumors. The pocket phantom tool may help test the accuracy of the PET/CT scanner and indicate whether adjustments need to be made to get consistent information.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Optimize the pocket phantom source design and the bias estimation algorithm: determine the tolerances and variations in the source sphere geometry and radioactive filing process; evaluate the need for higher-activity sources in the presence of increased attenuation (i.e. thicker patients); optimize CT contrast levels for source boundary detection and localization from CT images; evaluate the robustness for use with different scanner parameters (e.g. CT slice thicknesses); modify bias estimation algorithm as needed to take into account changes.

II. Develop automated and robust ID pocket phantom processing and web-based software as a service (SAS) analysis tools: automate initial identification of approximate location of the pocket phantom; add automated DICOM analysis for web-based SAS analysis tools for imaging sites.

III. Conduct phantom studies at multiple imaging centers to evaluate the performance with different imaging protocols, scanners, and reconstruction methods. Also test at multiple time points over 6-9 months to assess longitudinal stability.

IV. Conduct a comparative study with patients (at University of Washington [UW]) at multiple time points over 6-12 months to evaluate the performance of the pocket phantom in oncology patient imaging compared with current clinical practice.

OUTLINE:

Patients undergo a PET/CT scan as part of their standard clinical care. While still positioned for the clinical scan, patients undergo additional research PET/CT scans in a smaller region over 10 minutes with the pocket phantom placed nearby and a low-dose single bed position CT scan for attenuation correction (CTAC).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98109
        • Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with solid tumors receiving clinically indicated PET/CT scans.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient receiving clinically indicated PET/CT scan
  • Patient has a known solid tumor
  • Patient provides consent
  • Patient can tolerate additional time in scanner (i.e. not claustrophobic)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is pregnant
  • Patient cannot or does not provide consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Diagnostic (PET/CT)
Patients undergo a PET/CT scan as part of their standard clinical care. While still positioned for the clinical scan, patients undergo additional research PET/CT scans in a smaller region over 10 minutes with the pocket phantom placed nearby and a low-dose single bed position CTAC.
Undergo PET/CT scan as clinically indicated (Note: CT is for attenuation correction and not for diagnostic purposes).
Other Names:
  • CT
  • CAT
  • CAT Scan
  • Computerized Axial Tomography
  • Computerized Tomography
  • tomography
  • CT SCAN
Undergo limited field of view PET scan with the Pocket Phantom placed nearby to assist in scanner calibration. No additional PET tracer will be used.
Other Names:
  • Phantoms
Undergo PET/CT scan as clinically indicated.
Other Names:
  • Medical Imaging, Positron Emission Tomography
  • PET
  • Positron Emission Tomography Scan
  • Positron-Emission Tomography
  • proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging
  • PET SCAN

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in measured versus known quantitative values of the pocket phantom
Time Frame: At day 1 (All data will be collected during the clinically scheduled appointment. Analysis will follow typical image reconstruction times.)
Compare measured activity of the pocket phantom (as measured by a PET/CT scanner) to the known values of the pocket phantom (as calculated based on half-life activity of known source) to determine accuracy and precision of scanner calibration. This will be used to validate quantitative clinical measurements, like SUV (standardized uptake values), of known solid tumors.
At day 1 (All data will be collected during the clinically scheduled appointment. Analysis will follow typical image reconstruction times.)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Paul Kinahan, Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 24, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 22, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

July 4, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 25, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 9592 (Other Identifier: Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium)
  • P30CA015704 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • NCI-2016-00747 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))
  • R42CA167907 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Adult Solid Neoplasm

Clinical Trials on Computed Tomography

3
Subscribe