Efficacy of Cyclic DSG Compared With Cyclic MPA for the Treatment of Anovulatory DUB (SI-AUB-RCT)

August 20, 2018 updated by: Manee Rattanachaiyanont, Mahidol University

The Effectiveness of Cyclic Desogestrel Therapy for Abnormal Uterine Bleeding Associated With Anovulation: a Non-inferiority Double Blinded Randomized Control Trial

The objectives of the present study is to determine the effectiveness of cyclic desogestrel (DSG) compared with cyclic medroxyprogesterone acetate for the treatment of anovulatory dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB) in the following aspects:

  1. Endometrial histopathology changes
  2. Menstrual cycle control.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Anovulatory dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB) is the most common cause of abnormal uterine bleeding especially in postmenarcheal adolescent, perimenopausal women, patient with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and in obese women. Aims of treatment in women with anovulatory DUB are to restore the natural control mechanism of endometrium (introduce normal synchronous growth, development, shedding of a structural stable endometrium) and to prevent endometrial hyperplasia. The two main treatment options are estrogen-progestin therapy and progestin therapy. Women who are sexually active and not immediately prepared to pursue pregnancy are best manage by estrogen-progestin treatment especially combined oral contraceptive pills (COCs) but in perimenopausal women, obese women or women who can't tolerate COCs or have contraindications in using COCs, cyclic progestin will be the treatment of choice. Common used progestin in anovulatory DUB is medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) 5-10 mg/day for 10-14 days each month. This progestin has strong progestogenic effect but has some undesirable effect such as glucocorticoid effect, mineralocorticoid effect and androgenic effect. Long term using this progestin especially in obese women or perimenopausal women who have risk for diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia may be negative effect to glucose and lipid metabolism. DSG is the third generation progestin with no glucocorticoid, mineralocorticoid effect and low androgenic effect may be the better choice of treatment but the data of DSG in treatment of anovulatory DUB us scanty. So this study will evaluate the effect of cyclic DSG in endometrial histology changing and lipid, glucose metabolism in patient with anovulatory DUB.

Comparison : Women with anovulatory DUB are randomized into two groups, receiving a course of either cyclic DSG or cyclic MPA. The main outcome measured is to compare the effect of both interventions on endometrial histology changing.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

160

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bangkok, Thailand, 10700
        • Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Premenopausal women with anovular DUB (proved by endometrial histology)
  • Age > 18 yr.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any uterine pathology that might cause abnormal uterine bleeding
  • Contraindication to progestin treatment (such as breast cancer)
  • Severe drug allergy towards a progestogen
  • Intake of any hormonal treatment in the previous 3 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Desogestrel
Desogestrel Dosage form : Desogestrel 150 mcg/capsule Dosage : 150 mcg/day Frequency : 1 capsule/day before bed time Duration: 10 day/month
Desogestrel Dosage form : Desogestrel 150 mcg/capsule Dosage : 150 mcg/day Frequency : 1 capsule/day before bed time Duration: 10 day/month
Other Names:
  • Cerazette
Active Comparator: Medroxyprogesterone acetate
Medroxyprogesterone acetate Dosage form : 10 mg./capsule Dosage : 10 mg./day Frequency : 1 capsule/day before bed time Duration : 10 day/month
Medroxyprogesterone acetate Dosage form : 10 mg./capsule Dosage : 10 mg./day Frequency : 1 capsule/day before bed time Duration : 10 day/month
Other Names:
  • Provera

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The change in endometrial histology
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 8 or 9 or 10 of treatment period in first month
The participants are evaluated for changing of endometrial histology at day 8 or 9 or 10 of treatment period.
Baseline, Day 8 or 9 or 10 of treatment period in first month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The occurrence of withdrawal bleeding
Time Frame: 6 months
To compare the occurrence of withdrawal bleeding between cyclic DSG and cyclic MPA groups.
6 months
Effect of cyclic DSG on lipid metabolism compared with cyclic MPA
Time Frame: 6 months
To compare the change of total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride, HDL-C, and LDL-C between cyclic DSG and cyclic MPA groups.
6 months
Effect of cyclic DSG on glucose metabolism compared with cyclic MPA
Time Frame: 6 months
To compare the change of fasting blood glucose, and fasting insulin between cyclic DSG and cyclic MPA groups.
6 months
Adverse events
Time Frame: At day 8 or 9 or 10 of the first cycle and 3, 6 month
To compare the adverse events, including side effects between cyclic DSG and cyclic MPA groups.
At day 8 or 9 or 10 of the first cycle and 3, 6 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Manee Rattanachaiyanont, M.D., Mahidol University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 18, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

April 4, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding

Clinical Trials on Desogestrel

3
Subscribe