Impact of Multidisciplinary Review of Drug Prescriptions on Patient Safety in a Residence for Dependent Elderly (Rev-EHPAD)

The main objective of the study is to show that the multidisciplinary review of drug prescriptions changes the adverse drug event (ADE) geriatric risk score (according to Trivalle and Ducimetière 2013) for patients living in the Nîmes University Hospital Residence for Dependent Elderly.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The secondary objectives of this study are to assess and compare the following criteria before and after multidisciplinary review of drug prescriptions for patients in the Nîmes University Hospital Residence for Dependent Elderly:

A. the number of patients with at least one potentially inappropriate drug prescribed

B. the number of hospitalizations

C. death rate

D. the number of falls per patient and the rate of fallers

E. qualitative criteria describing the drug review

F. associated care costs

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

49

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nîmes, France, 30029
        • CHRU de Nîmes - Centre de Gérontologie de Serre Cavalier
      • Nîmes Cedex 09, France, 30029
        • CHRU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient (or his/her legal representative) must have given his/her informed and signed consent
  • The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
  • The patient is available for 6 months of follow-up
  • The patient has resided at the Nîmes University Hospital Residence for Dependent Elderly for at least the past 6 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient is participating in another study
  • The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
  • The patient is under judicial protection
  • The patient (or his/her legal representative) refuses to sign the consent
  • It is impossible to correctly inform the patient (or his/her legal representative)
  • The patient has resided at the Nîmes University Hospital Residence for Dependent Elderly for less than 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: The study population

See inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Intervention: Before-after study

The before-after study is composed of a first observational phase followed by a proactive phase, and then finally by a second observational phase.

The first observational phase corresponds to retrospective data-collecting for the information necessary for calculating the baseline ADE geriatric risk score.

The proactive phase corresponds to a multidisciplinary review of drug prescriptions (especially long-term drugs) for all included patients in the residence.

During the second observational phase, the same data as in the first observational phase will be collected a second time.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse Drug Events Geriatric Risk Score
Time Frame: change from Baseline to 6 months
according to Trivalle and Ducimetière 2013
change from Baseline to 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The number of patients taking at least 1 potentially inappropriate drug according to Laroche criteria
Time Frame: During the proactive phase. Day 0.
Laroche et al 2007.
During the proactive phase. Day 0.
Number of hospitalizations in the public sector (higher level care)
Time Frame: first observational phase (month -6 to day 0)
first observational phase (month -6 to day 0)
Number of hospitalizations in the public sector (higher level care)
Time Frame: second observational phase (day 0 to month 6)
second observational phase (day 0 to month 6)
Days of hospitalization in the public sector (higher level care)
Time Frame: first observational phase (month -6 to day 0)
first observational phase (month -6 to day 0)
Days of hospitalization in the public sector (higher level care)
Time Frame: second observational phase (day 0 to month 6)
second observational phase (day 0 to month 6)
Mortality
Time Frame: first observational phase (month -6 to day 0)
first observational phase (month -6 to day 0)
Mortality
Time Frame: second observational phase (day 0 to month 6)
second observational phase (day 0 to month 6)
The number of falls per patient
Time Frame: first observational phase (month -6 to day 0)
first observational phase (month -6 to day 0)
The number of falls per patient
Time Frame: second observational phase (day 0 to month 6)
second observational phase (day 0 to month 6)
The percentage of patients who fell
Time Frame: first observational phase (month -6 to day 0)
first observational phase (month -6 to day 0)
The percentage of patients who fell
Time Frame: second observational phase (day 0 to month 6)
second observational phase (day 0 to month 6)
The Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification for each revised drug
Time Frame: during the proactive phase (day 0)
during the proactive phase (day 0)
The type of errors detected during drug review
Time Frame: during the proactive phase (day 0)
Contra-indication, dosing, route, etc
during the proactive phase (day 0)
The type of modification suggested during drug review
Time Frame: during the proactive phase (day 0)
discontinuation, addition, substitution...
during the proactive phase (day 0)
The acceptation rate for modifications suggested during drug review
Time Frame: during the proactive phase (day 0)
during the proactive phase (day 0)
Associated care costs (€)
Time Frame: first observational phase (month -6 to day 0)
first observational phase (month -6 to day 0)
Associated care costs (€)
Time Frame: second observational phase (day 0 to month 6)
second observational phase (day 0 to month 6)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Géraldine Leguelinel, Pharm-D, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 16, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2014

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 21, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 6, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2015

Last Verified

April 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • LOCAL/2013/GL-01
  • 2013-A01590-45 (OTHER: RCB number)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Geriatrics

Clinical Trials on Before-after study

Subscribe