Targeted Nurse-driven HIV Screening in Emergency Departments (DICI-VIH)

Targeted Nurse-driven HIV Screening Using Rapid Tests in Emergency Departments in the Metropolitan Paris Region

To reduce late HIV diagnosis that remains common in France, the national health agency has promoted non-targeted HIV screening in health care settings, including emergency departments (EDs). In our previous survey, non-targeted nurse-driven HIV screening by rapid tests was feasible, well-accepted but identified only a few new HIV diagnoses mostly among patients at high-risk. Our findings, consistent with results from other international groups, suggest that a targeted strategy could be feasible, efficient and cost-effective with fewer tests required. However, the feasibility and the efficacy of this strategy remain unknown in France.

The main aim of the present study is to compare the efficacy of 2 strategies: 1) the combination of the nurse-driven HIV targeted screening and the current practice (physician-directed HIV diagnostic testing) versus 2) the current practice alone.

The strategies will be compared during 2 randomly assigned periods (cluster randomization and cross-over) in 8 EDs of metropolitan Paris.

During targeted period, nurses will offer screening to all patients at EDs, aged 18-64 years old, identified as high-risk by a self-administered questionnaire, not know to be HIV positive, not being seen for post-exposure prophylaxis or unstable medical illness, and accepting to participate by providing an informed consent.

In case of confirmed reactive rapid test result, a follow-up visit with an on-site infectious disease specialist will be arranged within the following 48 hours.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background :

Despite easy and free access to HIV testing services and 5 million of tests per year performed, late diagnosis remains common in France with one-third of HIV infections diagnosed associated with AIDS or CD4 lymphocyte counts of less than 200/μL. To improve early detection, the national health agency has promoted non-targeted HIV screening in health care settings, including emergency departments (EDs), in addition to diagnostic testing routinely performed by physicians. In our previous survey conducted in 2009-2010 in 29 EDs of the metropolitan Paris area, non-targeted nurse-driven HIV screening by rapid tests was feasible, well-accepted but identified only a few new HIV diagnoses mostly among patients at high-risk. Our findings, consistent with results from other international groups, suggest that a targeted strategy could be feasible, efficient and cost-effective with fewer tests required. However, the feasibility and the efficacy of this strategy remain unknown in France.

Primary objective :

The aim of the present study is to compare the efficacy of two strategies: 1) the combination of the nurse-driven HIV targeted screening and the current practice (physician-directed HIV diagnostic testing) versus 2) the current practice alone (physician-directed HIV diagnostic testing).

The main outcome measure is the number of patients with newly identified HIV infection among the number of 18-64 years patients visited EDs (apart from being seen for prophylaxis after exposure to HIV) during the inclusion periods.

Secondary objectives :

The linkage into care of patients with newly diagnosed infection, the number of new HIV positive tests among the total number of tests, and the early detection will be compared.

The feasibility of the nurse-driven HIV screening (proportion of : filled-questionnaires, proposition of the nurse-driven HIV screening, acceptation by patients and HIV rapid tests done by nurses) and its acceptability caregivers in each ED will be evaluated as well as its cost-effectiveness.

Methods :

Multicenter trial with cluster randomization and cross-over The 2 strategies will be compared during 2 randomly assigned periods separated by a month (cluster randomization and cross-over). 8 750 patients per ED and per period are expected with 8 EDs (cf. statistical plan).

The study will be performed in 8 EDs of metropolitan Paris, an area in which half of France's new HIV patients are diagnosed. The centers will be selected based on the high proportion of patients at high risk visiting the EDs.

During targeted period, nurses will offer screening to all patients at EDs, aged 18-64 years old, identified as high-risk by a self-administered questionnaire, not know to be HIV positive, not being seen for post-exposure prophylaxis or unstable medical illness, and accepting to participate by providing an informed consent. The questionnaire was previously tested in one ED.

In case of reactive rapid test result, blood specimen will be collected for standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and western blot confirmation. A follow-up visit with an on-site infectious disease specialist will be arranged within the following 48 hours.

Perspective :

This project will allow defining the benefit of nurse-driven HIV targeted screening in EDs and its potential utility to improve HIV screening in France.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

148327

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75012
        • Clinical Research Center (Centre de Recherche Clinique de l'Est Parisien, CRC-Est), Groupe Hospitalier des Hôpitaux Universitaires Est Parisien, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 64 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients at EDs, aged 18-64 years old and not being seen at ED for post exposure prophylaxis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Combination of the nurse-driven HIV targeted screening and the
Nurses will offer screening to all patients at EDs, aged 18-64 years old, identified as high-risk by a self-administered questionnaire, not know to be HIV positive, accepting to participate by providing an informed consent and not being seen at ED for post-exposure prophylaxis or unstable medical illness. The questionnaire was previously tested in one ED. In case of reactive rapid test result, blood specimen will be collected for standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Western blot confirmation. A follow-up visit with an on-site infectious disease specialist will be arranged within the following 48 hours.
Active Comparator: Current practice (no intervention)
Physician-directed HIV diagnostic testing

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of patients with newly identified HIV infection among the number of 18-64 years patients visited EDs (apart from being seen at ED for prophylaxis after exposure to HIV) during the inclusion periods
Time Frame: At the end of the expected total duration of the inclusion periods : up to 9 months in each center
At the end of the expected total duration of the inclusion periods : up to 9 months in each center

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Linkage into care of patients with newly diagnosed infection (Follow-up visit with an on-site infectious disease specialist)
Time Frame: In the 3 months after the HIV screening at the emergency department
In the 3 months after the HIV screening at the emergency department
Number of new HIV positive tests among the total number of tests
Time Frame: At the end of the expected total duration of the inclusion periods : up to 9 months in each center
At the end of the expected total duration of the inclusion periods : up to 9 months in each center
Early detection of HIV (Proportion of patients with CD4>500/mm3, >350/mm3 and >200/mm3, and without HIV-related symptoms at presentation)
Time Frame: In the 3 months after the HIV screening at the emergency department
In the 3 months after the HIV screening at the emergency department
Feasibility of the nurse-driven HIV screening (Proportion of : filled-questionnaires, proposition of the nurse-driven HIV screening, acceptation by patients and HIV rapid tests done by nurses)
Time Frame: At the end of the expected total duration of the inclusion periods : up to 9 months in each center
At the end of the expected total duration of the inclusion periods : up to 9 months in each center
Acceptability of the nurse-driven HIV screening by the caregivers (Interviews with nurses, nurse managers, physician doctors and hospital managers)
Time Frame: Before and after the expected total duration of the inclusion periods : up to 9 months in each center
Before and after the expected total duration of the inclusion periods : up to 9 months in each center
Cost-effectiveness of the 2 compared strategies
Time Frame: At the end of the expected total duration of the inclusion periods : up to 9 months in each center
At the end of the expected total duration of the inclusion periods : up to 9 months in each center
Acceptability of the nurse-driven HIV screening by the patients (additional questionnaire proposed to patients in 4 centers)
Time Frame: Questionnaire proposed at ED for each patient after the main study questionnaire during inclusion period. Analysis after the expected total duration of the inclusion periods : up to 9 months in each center
Questionnaire proposed at ED for each patient after the main study questionnaire during inclusion period. Analysis after the expected total duration of the inclusion periods : up to 9 months in each center

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

April 30, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 1, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2016

Last Verified

April 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • K130601

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Targeted HIV Screening, Emergency Departments

Clinical Trials on Nurse-driven HIV targeted screening

3
Subscribe