The Impact of Patient Complexity on Healthcare Utilization

October 27, 2017 updated by: OCHIN, Inc.
Healthcare providers are routinely being assessed for metrics designed to assess the quality of the care they deliver. There is growing consensus that these measurements, which typically assess the percentage of patients meeting a specific standard of care, should be adjusted for the clinical complexity of the providers. This study will assess whether adjusting for the social complexity of the patient panel adds significantly to adjustment for clinical complexity in explaining apparent differences in quality of care provided by Primary care providers and clinics.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The analysis will be conducted in 2 stages. In the first stage, indicators of social complexity (as assessed by characteristics of the patients' geocoded addresses) will be tested for significant association with patient level outcomes (meeting or not meeting a specific standard of care). These indicators will be assessed in 4 cohorts: 2 cohorts of patients identified in electronic health records of Clinical Research Networks of community health centers, and 2 cohorts of patients insured by Medicaid in 2015 (Oregon and Florida Medicaid cohorts). Due to limitations in the available data, some quality indicators can only be evaluated in a subset of the cohorts. The consistency of specific social complexity indicators, referred to as Community Vital Signs (CVS), will be evaluated across the cohorts and quality metrics.

In the second stage, CVS indicators that contributed consistently to models at the patient level will be evaluated for their effect on provider ranking on quality metrics if the metrics are adjusted for the social complexity of the providers' patient panel in addition to the panels' clinical complexity.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200000

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Stage 1 (Patient Level): Established patients of primary care providers with a visit in 2015 Stage 2 (Provider level): Primary Care providers with at least 20 patients from established patients in 2015 Stage 3 (Clinic level): Primary care Clinics

Description

Inclusion criteria for clinics: Clinics must be a clinic that offers Primary Care (Family Medicine Clinics, Pediatrics Clinics, General Practice Clinics, Internal Medicine clinics that are not limited to a subspecialty focus, and multi-specialty clinics that include primary care providers as part of a comprehensive care team.) Clinics must have implemented their EHR by 1/1/2014.

Inclusion criteria for patients: EHR Patients must be established patients within a health care system: at least one ambulatory visit to an included clinic in 2015 and at least 1 visit to a primary care clinic within the same health system prior to that visit.

Inclusion criteria for patients for Medicaid based Outcomes: Patient must have been continuously covered by Medicaid in 2015 and have had at least 1 visit billed as an office visit in 2015 with a provider identified as a primary care provider and at least 1 prior claim billed to the same provider. Patients must meet the age/condition criteria for the assessment of at least 1 secondary outcome.

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria for patients: Patients with no geocoded address on file will be excluded from the analysis.

Exclusion criteria for patients for Medicaid based Outcomes: Patient with Medicaid coverage gaps of >45 days will be excluded from theses analyses. Exclusion criteria for providers: Providers with <20 patients in any Quality metric denominator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
OCHIN EHR

Patients who were established patients at OCHIN Primary Care Clinics in 2015 and had a face to face visit at the clinic in 2015.

Inclusion criteria for specific outcomes varies by criteria for demoninator specification for the metric.

This is an observational study of the association of clinical comorbidity and neighborhood social deprivation characteristics with healthcare performance assessment.
OneFlorida EHR

Patients who were established patients at OneFlorida Primary Care clinics in 2015 and had a face to fact visit at the clinic in 2015.

Inclusion criteria for specific outcomes varies by criteria for demoninator specification for the metric.

This is an observational study of the association of clinical comorbidity and neighborhood social deprivation characteristics with healthcare performance assessment.
Oregon Medicaid

Clients who were continuously insured through Oregon Medicaid in 2015 and had a claim with an Evaluation and Management Current Procedure Terminology (CPT) code indicating an office visit listing a Primary Care provider as the performing provider.

Inclusion criteria for specific outcomes varies by criteria for demoninator specification for the metric.

This is an observational study of the association of clinical comorbidity and neighborhood social deprivation characteristics with healthcare performance assessment.
Florida Medicaid

Clients who were continuously insured through Florida Medicaid in 2015 and had a claim with an Evaluation and Management Current Procedure Terminology (CPT) code indicating an office visit listing a Primary Care provider as the performing provider. Florida Medicaid data is limited to clients who were 22 years or younger.

Inclusion criteria for specific outcomes varies by criteria for demoninator specification for the metric.

This is an observational study of the association of clinical comorbidity and neighborhood social deprivation characteristics with healthcare performance assessment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Provider Ranking as Assessed by Health Care Quality Metrics
Time Frame: 1 year (2015)
Comparison of adjusted provider quality rankings with metrics adjusted for Charlson Morbidity Scores and Patient Panel Neighborhood Deprivation Indicators
1 year (2015)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Well Child Visits in first 15 Months of life (patient level)
Time Frame: 15 months
Number of well child visits in first 15 months of life in children turning 15 months in 2015
15 months
Screening for alcohol and drug misuse (patient level)
Time Frame: 1 year (2015)
Documented screening for alcohol or drug misuse in patients aged 12 and over
1 year (2015)
Emergency Department Visits (Patient level)
Time Frame: 1 year (2015)
Age stratified Emergency department visit rates in patients in Medicaid cohorts
1 year (2015)
Avoidable Emergency Department Visits (Patient level)
Time Frame: 1 year (2015)
Age stratified Avoidable Emergency department visit rates in patients in Medicaid cohorts
1 year (2015)
Uncontrolled Hemoglobin A1c in Diabetics (patient level)
Time Frame: 1 year
Last recorded HbA1c greater than 9 in patients with recorded diagnosis of Diabetes (EHR cohorts only)
1 year
Colorectal Cancer Screening (Patient level)
Time Frame: 1 year
Documented colorectal cancer screening in 2015 (Oregon Medicaid cohort only)
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Abigail Sears, MBA, OCHIN, Inc.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 27, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HSD-1603-34987

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Emergency Department Utilization

Clinical Trials on Charlson score and Community Social Deprivation

3
Subscribe