Rate Control Versus Rhythm Control For Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation

February 28, 2019 updated by: Annetine Gelijns, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
The purpose of this study is to compare the therapeutic strategies of rate control versus rhythm control in cardiac surgery patients who develop in-hospital postoperative atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter (AF). In patients who develop AF during hospitalization after cardiac surgery, the hypothesis is that a strategy of rhythm control will reduce days in hospital within 60 days of the occurrence of AF compared to a strategy of rate control.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of the research is to compare two strategies for treating atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, both of which are referred to as AF, after cardiac surgery. AF is the most common complication after cardiac surgery. AF is when the upper chambers of the heart (atria) experience disorganized electrical activity which causes the heart beat to be irregular. The two treatment strategies to be used in this study are called rhythm control and rate control. The rhythm control strategy will attempt to bring the heart beat back to a regular rhythm using treatments known and approved to control heart rhythm. The rate control strategy will attempt to bring the heart rate to less than 100 beats per minute at rest using medications known and recommended to control heart rate. Both strategies are commonly used to treat AF. All of the medications that will be used in this study are the standard of care for use in patients experiencing AF. This research seeks to determine whether rhythm control is better than rate control in patients with AF after cardiac surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

523

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Quebec, Canada, G1V 4G5
        • Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie de Quebec (Hopital Laval)
    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2B7
        • University of Alberta Hospital
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5B 1W8
        • Toronto General Hospital
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H4J 1C5
        • Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2W 1T8
        • Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal
      • Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H1T 1C8
        • Montreal Heart Institute
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033
        • University of Southern California
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30308
        • Emory University
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
        • University of Maryland
      • Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20814
        • NIH Heart Center at Suburban Hospital
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • University of Michigan Health Services
    • New York
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10467
        • Montefiore Einstein Heart Center
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University Medical Center
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    • North Carolina
      • Asheville, North Carolina, United States, 28801
        • Mission Hospital
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • The Ohio State University Medical Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • University of Pennsylvania
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Baylor College of Medicine
      • Plano, Texas, United States, 75093
        • Baylor Research Institute
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22908
        • University of Virginia Health Systems
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53792
        • University of Wisconsin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Enrollment Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years
  • Undergoing heart surgery for coronary artery bypass (on-pump or off-pump CABG) and/or valve repair or replacement (excluding mechanical valves), including re-operations
  • Hemodynamically stable

Randomization Inclusion Criteria

  • AF that persists for > 60 minutes or recurrent (more than one) episodes of AF up to 7 days after surgery during the index hospitalization.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • LVAD insertion or heart transplantation
  • Maze procedure
  • TAVR
  • History of or planned mechanical valve replacement
  • Correction of complex congenital cardiac defect (excluding bicuspid aortic valve, atrial septal defect or PFO)
  • History of AF or AFL
  • History of AF or AFL ablation
  • Contraindications to warfarin or amiodarone
  • Need for long-term anticoagulation
  • Concurrent participation in an interventional (drug or device) trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Rhythm control

Rhythm Control in post-operative AF

Amiodarone and/or DC-cardioversion

Amiodarone Initial Dose

  • Oral: 400 mg po TID for 3 days is recommended
  • For patients incapable of taking oral: 150 mg IV bolus over 10 min, then 1 mg/min over 6 hours followed by 0.5 mg/min over 18 hours Maintenance Dose
  • Oral: at least 200 mg/day to be continued until 60 days after randomization
  • If drug cannot be given orally or via NG tube: 0.5 mg/min administered through central line (e.g., PICC) until oral dosing is started

DC-Cardioversion - frequency and duration determined by medical professional as medically needed

Amiodarone Initial Dose

  • Oral: 400 mg po TID for 3 days is recommended
  • For patients incapable of taking oral: 150 mg IV bolus over 10 min, then 1 mg/min over 6 hours followed by 0.5 mg/min over 18 hours Maintenance Dose
  • Oral: at least 200 mg/day to be continued until 60 days after randomization
  • If drug cannot be given orally or via NG tube: 0.5 mg/min administered through central line (e.g., PICC) until oral dosing is started
Other Names:
  • Cordarone
DC-Cardioversion - frequency and duration determined by medical professional as medically needed
Other Names:
  • Direct Current Cardioversion
Active Comparator: Rate control

Rate Control in post-operative AF

Beta-blocker and/or Calcium channel blockers and/or Digoxin

Dose, frequency and duration determined by medical professional as medically needed

Beta-blocker and/or Calcium channel blockers and/or Digoxin - Dose, frequency and duration determined by medical professional as medically needed
Other Names:
  • Digoxin
  • Beta-blocker
  • Calcium channel blockers

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Number of Days in Hospital
Time Frame: Within 60 days of randomization
The total number of days in hospital for any hospitalization that occurs within 60 days of randomization to AF treatment strategy.
Within 60 days of randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Conversion to Sustained, Stable Non-AF Rhythm
Time Frame: Up to index hospital discharge or 7 days post surgery, whichever came first
Up to index hospital discharge or 7 days post surgery, whichever came first
Heart Rhythm Comparison
Time Frame: Hospital discharge
Compare heart rhythm (number of patients in sustained, stable non-AF rhythm) between treatment arms at hospital discharge
Hospital discharge
Heart Rhythm Comparison
Time Frame: 30 days after randomization
Compare heart rhythm (patients in sustained, stable non-AF rhythm) between treatment arms at 30 days after randomization
30 days after randomization
Heart Rhythm Comparison
Time Frame: 60 days after randomization
Compare heart rhythm (number of patients in sustained, stable non-AF rhythm) between treatment arms at 60 days after randomization
60 days after randomization
Length of Stay (Index Hospitalization)
Time Frame: Within 60 days post surgery
Overall length of stay for the index hospitalization
Within 60 days post surgery
Length of Stay (Rehospitalization, Including ED Visits)
Time Frame: Within 60 days of randomization
Compare length of stay between groups for any cause and AF-related hospitalizations, including ED visits
Within 60 days of randomization
Outpatient Interventions
Time Frame: Within 60 days of randomization
Compare frequency of outpatient visits between groups for any cause and AF-related causes
Within 60 days of randomization
AF- or Treatment-related Events
Time Frame: Within 60 days of randomization
Within 60 days of randomization
Cost (Hospital)
Time Frame: Within 60 days of randomization
Compare cost of index hospitalization and cost of rehospitalizations (including ED visits) between groups
Within 60 days of randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Richard Wiesel, MD, Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network
  • Study Chair: Patrick T O'Gara, MD, Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 5, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

May 7, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on Amiodarone

Subscribe