Effect of the Rehabilitation Effort at Home in Patients With Head and Neck Tumor Treated With Curative Intent (NUTRIMOUV)

Phase II Study, Multicentric, Randomized Studying the Effect of the Rehabilitation Effort at Home in Patients With Head and Neck Tumor Treated With Curative Intent

Improvement exercise tolerance

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study allows improved exercise tolerance in patients undergoing rehabilitation effort

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Montpellier, France, 34298
        • Institut régional du Cancer - Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Tumor squamous cell head and neck (excluding nasopharynx) nonmetastatic including cervical lymphadenopathy primitives
  • Patient to be treated with curative radiotherapy monofractionnée for at least 6 weeks, with or without concurrent chemotherapy (including targeted therapies)
  • KPS ≥ 60

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cancer of the nasopharynx
  • Metastatic Patient
  • Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or induction
  • Patient parenteral nutrition
  • Non-compliant Patient Treatment
  • Patient with a cons-indication to the achievement of an effort: clinical signs of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) uncontrolled heart failure, recent myocardial infarction, arrhythmias, unstable angina.
  • Patient desaturation in the stress test
  • Patient already included in another clinical trial with an experimental molecule
  • Pacemaker or defibrillator or neurostimulator
  • Contraindications to treatment with standard radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Rehabilitation effort
custom work endurance combining dietary management adapted to the nutritional status and an APA. Included patients benefit from support for 19 weeks from the start of treatment
Experimental: Rehabilitation effort
Active Comparator: Control
Control with dietary management adapted to the nutritional status
dietary management adapted to the nutritional status

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
measurement of the increase of initial endurance
Time Frame: up to 24 weeks
Patients increasing rate of at least 40% of their initial endurance time 3 months after the completion of radiotherapy
up to 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life
Time Frame: 3 months after the end of radiotherapy
Quality of life 3 months after the end of radiotherapy (QLQ C30 and SF 36)
3 months after the end of radiotherapy
Quality of life
Time Frame: 3 months after the end of radiotherapy
"Performance status" (Karnofsky) 3 months after the end of radiotherapy.
3 months after the end of radiotherapy
Quality of life
Time Frame: 3 months after the end of radiotherapy
Quantity of daily physical activity to 3 months after the end of radiotherapy (Actimeter).
3 months after the end of radiotherapy
Quality of life
Time Frame: 3 months after the end of radiotherapy
Decrease addiction to 3 months after the end of radiotherapy (Declarative).
3 months after the end of radiotherapy
Quality of life
Time Frame: 3 months after the end of radiotherapy
Rate of feasibility of the protocol.
3 months after the end of radiotherapy
Quality of life
Time Frame: 3 months after the end of radiotherapy
Identification of indicator (s) to monitor the APA.
3 months after the end of radiotherapy
Quality of life
Time Frame: 3 months after the end of radiotherapy
Evaluation of precariousness (EPICES).
3 months after the end of radiotherapy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pierre SENESSE, ICM Co. Ltd.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

May 9, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • VA2011/43

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Head and Neck Cancer

Clinical Trials on custom work endurance

Subscribe