Omega Loop Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (YOMEGA)

December 13, 2025 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon

Prospective Multicentric Randomized Trial of Efficiency and Safety of Laparoscopic Omega Loop Bypass Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Several prospective trials and metaanalysis have demonstrated the superiority of bariatric surgery on the medical treatment of obesity. The Roux-en-Y Gastric ByPass (RYGBP) procedure has been practiced for more than 30 years, and is the procedure of choice for morbidly obese with metabolic disorders in most of the reference centers. Nevertheless, the RYGBP is a technically demanding procedure with a learning curve of more than 75 cases. The complication rate is around 10% in expert centers.

More recently another procedure has been described which seems as efficient on weight loss and co-morbidities as the RYGBP, with the advantage of being less technically difficult and less morbid, especially for multi-complicated obese and/or the super obese. It consists of a unique gastro-jejunal anastomosis between a long gastric pouch and a jejunal Omega loop. However, this procedure could be at risk of biliary reflux and anastomotic ulcers with dysplastic changes of the gastric and esophageal mucosa. As a result, the Omega loop bypass (OLB) has only been developed by a few teams and remains a controversial subject, particularly as only one monocentric randomized trial has compared it to the RYGBP, which is remains the gold standard. The first litterature results show similar or even better weight loss efficiency than RYGBP with a better feasibility. The early complication rate seems lower, but there are still insufficient data on long term morbidity and biliary reflux consequences.

By performing a randomized and prospective comparison of OLB to RYGBP, the aim of the investigators study is to analyze the weight loss efficiency, the morbidity and mortality, the feasibility, and the quality of life of both techniques, in order to validate the Omega loop bypass as a procedure of choice in bariatric surgery

Hypothesis :

The OLB, while being as efficient as RYGBP on weight loss and metabolic complications, could be less morbid.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

256

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Grenoble, France, 38043
        • Clinique Universitaire de Chirurgie Digestive et de l'Urgence - CHU de Grenoble
      • Guilherand-Granges, France, 07500
        • Cabinet de chirurgie générale, digestive et de l'obésité - Hôpital Privé Drôme et Ardèche
      • Lille, France, 59037
        • Service de Chirurgie Générale et Endocrinienne - Hôpital Claude Huriez - CHU de Lille
      • Lyon, France, 69437
        • Service de Chirurgie Digestive - Hôpital Edouard Herriot - Hospices Civils de Lyon
      • Paris, France, 75013
        • Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Hépato-Bilio-Pancréatique et Transplantation Hépatique - Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière
      • Paris, France, 75908
        • Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Générale et Cancérologique - Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou - APHP
      • Saint-Etienne, France, 42100
        • Service de Chirurgie Générale - Hôpital Privé de la Loire
      • Saint-Germain-en-Laye, France, 78100
        • Service de Chirurgie Générale, Digestive et Viscérale - Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy / Saint Gerrmain en Laye
      • Saint-Grégoire, France, 35768
        • Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Hépato-Biliaire-Centre Hospitalier Privé Saint Grégoire

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged between 18 and 65 years old
  • Morbid obesity with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 or BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 associated with one or more co-morbidities (type 2 diabetes, arterial hypertension, sleep apnea, dyslipidemia, arthritis)
  • Patient who has benefited from an upper GI endoscopy with biopsies
  • Patient who has benefited from a pluridisciplinary evaluation, with a favorable opinion for a gastric bypass
  • Patient who understands and accepts the need for a long term follow-up
  • Patient who agrees to be included in the study and who signs the informed consent form
  • Patient affiliated to a healthcare insurance plan

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of esophagitis on upper GI endoscopy (Los Angeles classification)
  • Severe gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), resistant to medical treatment
  • Presence of dysplastic modifications of the gastric mucosa or a history of gastric cancer, on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
  • Presence of Helicobacter Pylori resistant to medical treatment
  • Presence of an unhealed gastro-duodenal ulcer or an ulcer diagnosed less than 2 months previously
  • History of previous bariatric surgery (gastric band, sleeve gastrectomy, vertical banded gastroplasty)
  • Presence of a severe and evolutive life threatening pathology, unrelated to obesity
  • Presence of chronic diarrhea (≥ 3 loose or liquid stools per day, over a period of more than 4 weeks)
  • Pregnancy or desire to be pregnant during the study
  • Binge eating disorders or other eating disorders according to DSM V criteria
  • Mentally unbalanced patients, under supervision or guardianship
  • Patient who does not understand French/is unable to give consent
  • Patient not affiliated to a French or European healthcare insurance
  • Patient who has already been included in a trial which has a conflict of interests with the present study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Laparoscopic Omega Loop Bypass
Laparoscopic Mini-gastric bypass

The laparoscopic Omega Loop Bypass will consist of:

  • a long gastric tube, stapled approximately 1.5 cm from the left of the lesser curvature of the antrum to the angle of His
  • a narrow gastric tube will be calibrated to be approximately 1.5 cm wide
  • an Omega loop of 200 cm
  • a unique gastro-jejunal anatomosis of 200cm from the ligament of Treitz, using a linear stapler
Active Comparator: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric ByPass
Procedure of reference in bariatric surgery

The laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass will consist of:

  • a small gastric pouch (about 30cc)
  • an antecolic alimentary limb
  • a gastro-jejunal anastomosis using a linear stapler
  • a 150cm long alimentary limb
  • a 50cm biliary limb
  • a latero-lateral jejuno-jejunal anastomosis
  • closure of the mesenteric defects

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Weight loss assessment according to Excess BMI Loss percentage (EBL%)
Time Frame: 2 years after surgery

Weight loss assessment according to Excess BMI Loss percentage (EBL%), calculated using the following formula:

((BMI 2 years after surgery - initial BMI) / (initial BMI - 22.5)) X 100

2 years after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Weight loss according to absolute weight loss (aWL in kg), Excess Weight Loss percentage (EWL%), EBL%
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after surgery
1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after surgery
Waist size reduction according to absolute waist size (in cm)
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after surgery
1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after surgery
Medical and surgical complication rates
Time Frame: 1, 12 and 24 months after surgery
Medical and surgical complication rates (anastomotic leaks, biliary reflux, bowel obstruction, anastomotic ulcers, anastomotic stenosis, internal hernia, chronic gastritis, esophagitis, iron deficiency anemia …)
1, 12 and 24 months after surgery
Type and severity of complications
Time Frame: During the month following surgery (for early complications) and from one month to 24 months postoperatively (for late complications)
Type and severity of early and late complications for each procedure, according to the Dindo-Clavien classification
During the month following surgery (for early complications) and from one month to 24 months postoperatively (for late complications)
Operative time
Time Frame: Recorded on the day of surgery (Day 0)
Operative time (expressed in minutes)
Recorded on the day of surgery (Day 0)
Mean length of stay
Time Frame: Average period of 5 days from surgery (Day of surgery = D0) until the end of hospitalization, recorded on Visit 4 (Month1 +/- 10 days)
Mean length of stay based on the number of days of hospitalization from surgery (Day of surgery = D0) until the end of hospitalization
Average period of 5 days from surgery (Day of surgery = D0) until the end of hospitalization, recorded on Visit 4 (Month1 +/- 10 days)
Patient's quality of life
Time Frame: The day before surgery (D-1) and 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery
Patient's quality of life score according to the IWQOL questionnaire and the BAROS questionnaire adapted to bariatric surgery
The day before surgery (D-1) and 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery
Metabolic and lipid profile
Time Frame: During the period of inclusion (D-60 to D-2) and at 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery
Metabolic profile of glucose homeostasis and the lipid profile according to antidiabetic and anitilipidemic treatments, HbA1c level, fasting glycemia, HDL, LDL and TG.
During the period of inclusion (D-60 to D-2) and at 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery
Dumping syndrome and hypoglycemia symptoms
Time Frame: At 1, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months after surgery
Dumping syndrome and hypoglycemia symptoms will be assessed using the Sigstad questionnaire
At 1, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months after surgery
Gastroesophageal reflux
Time Frame: The day before surgery (Day-1) and 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery
Gastroesophageal reflux assessed by items 5 and 27 of the GIQLI questionnaire
The day before surgery (Day-1) and 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery
Modifications of the gastric and esophageal mucosa
Time Frame: 2 years after surgery
Histological modifications of the gastric and esophageal mucosa, based on upper GI endoscopy with biopsies
2 years after surgery
Frequency of diarrhea
Time Frame: The day before surgery (day-1) and 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery
Frequency of diarrhea based on items 7, 30, 31 and 36 of the GIQLI questionnaire
The day before surgery (day-1) and 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery
Nutritional status
Time Frame: During the period of inclusion (D-60 to D-2) and 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery (The 24-hour steatorrhea will be quantified at 6 months).
Nutritional status, assessed by PTH, vitamin B1, B9, B12, and D levels before and 12 and 24 months after surgery and assessed by hemoglobin, albumin, prealbumin, ferritin, saturation coefficient, before and 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery .
During the period of inclusion (D-60 to D-2) and 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery (The 24-hour steatorrhea will be quantified at 6 months).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maud ROBERT, MD, Service de Chirurgie Digestive - Hôpital Edouard Herriot - Hospices Civils de Lyon - France

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2014

First Posted (Estimated)

May 15, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 19, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on Laparoscopic Mini-gastric bypass

Subscribe