Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of PT20 in Subjects With Hyperphosphataemia and Dialysis Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease

December 13, 2017 updated by: Phosphate Therapeutics
The main purpose of this study is to see whether PT20 can help people with a high level of phosphate in their blood (called Hyperphosphatemia) that are being treated with dialysis for kidney disease.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

PT20 represents a mechanism to address many of the limitations associated with current phosphate binding agents. The available clinical and non clinical evidence suggests that PT20 binds phosphate and prevents its uptake more efficiently than other phosphate binding drugs and may therefore either reduce the pill burden associated with controlling phosphate levels, or result in lower phosphate levels with the same pill burden.

The this study is the first to investigate the efficacy and safety of PT20 in subjects with dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

153

Phase

  • Phase 2

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men or women aged 18 90 years
  • Subject must have a stable dialysis prescription for at least 28 days prior to start of Screening.
  • Subject must have the most recent serum phosphate measurement, taken during the 28 days prior to the start of Screening, of ≥ 4.0 mg/dL and ≤ 8 mg/dL.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject's most recent historical pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate value within 14 days prior to the start of Screening (Visit 1) is < 18 mg/dL.
  • Subject has, in the opinion of the investigator, severe chronic lung disease and/or carbon dioxide retention.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group 1 - PT20 400 mg tid

PT20 400 mg tid (1.2 g/day) administered orally.

Dosing was initiated with the subject's first meal/snack following receipt of study medication at Visit 7 (Day 1). There was to be no change in dose administration level with respect to each cohort in this study

Modified ferric oxide adipate tablets
Other Names:
  • Iron (III) oxide adipate
  • ferric oxide adipate
  • iron (III) oxide hydroxide adipate
  • M10L78
Experimental: Group 2 - PT20 800 mg tid

PT20 800 mg tid (2.4 g/day) administered orally.

Dosing was initiated with the subject's first meal/snack following receipt of study medication at Visit 7 (Day 1). There was to be no change in dose administration level with respect to each cohort in this study

Modified ferric oxide adipate tablets
Other Names:
  • Iron (III) oxide adipate
  • ferric oxide adipate
  • iron (III) oxide hydroxide adipate
  • M10L78
Experimental: Group 3 - PT20 1600 mg tid

PT20 1600 mg tid (4.8 g/day) administered orally.

Dosing was initiated with the subject's first meal/snack following receipt of study medication at Visit 7 (Day 1). There was to be no change in dose administration level with respect to each cohort in this study

Modified ferric oxide adipate tablets
Other Names:
  • Iron (III) oxide adipate
  • ferric oxide adipate
  • iron (III) oxide hydroxide adipate
  • M10L78
Experimental: Group 4 - PT20 3200 mg tid

PT20 3200 mg tid (9.6 g/day) administered orally.

Dosing was initiated with the subject's first meal/snack following receipt of study medication at Visit 7 (Day 1). There was to be no change in dose administration level with respect to each cohort in this study

Modified ferric oxide adipate tablets
Other Names:
  • Iron (III) oxide adipate
  • ferric oxide adipate
  • iron (III) oxide hydroxide adipate
  • M10L78
Placebo Comparator: Group 5 - Placebo tid

Matched Placebo (for PT20) tid administered orally.

Dosing was initiated with the subject's first meal/snack following receipt of study medication at Visit 7 (Day 1). There was to be no change in dose administration level with respect to each cohort in this study

Placebo tablets matched to each PT20 dose arm
Other Names:
  • Matched Placebo for PT20

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Serum Phosphate Concentration From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 29
The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in serum phosphate concentration from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29). All study specific blood samples were collected, processed and analysed using a central laboratory.
Day 1 to Day 29

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Haemoglobin Concentration From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 29
Descriptive statistics were to be used to summarise values and change from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Day 29 (Visit 11) in haemoglobin concentration. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was to be used to analyse the changes from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29), which were to include the fixed, categorical effects of treatment as well as the continuous, fixed covariates of Baseline concentrations for haemoglobin. Only those subjects with available concentrations for both Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) and Visit 11 (Day 29) were to be included in this analysis.
Day 1 to Day 29
Change in Serum Ferritin Concentration From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 29
Descriptive statistics were to be used to summarise values and change from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Day 29 (Visit 11) in serum ferritin concentration. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was to be used to analyse the changes from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29), which were to include the fixed, categorical effects of treatment and week (Visit), as well as the continuous, fixed covariates of Baseline concentrations for serum ferritin. Only those subjects with available concentrations for both Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) and Visit 11 (Day 29) were to be included in this analysis.
Day 1 to Day 29
Change in Transferrin Saturation From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 29
Descriptive statistics were to be used to summarise values and change from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Day 29 (Visit 11) in transferrin saturation. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was to be used to analyse the changes from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Day 29 (Visit 11), which were to include the fixed, categorical effects of treatment and week, as well as the continuous, fixed covariates of Baseline concentrations for transferrin saturation. Only those subjects with available concentrations for both Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) and Visit 11 (Day 29) were to be included in this analysis.
Day 1 to Day 29
Change in Calcium x Phosphate Product From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 29
Descriptive statistics were to be used to summarise values and change from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Day 29 (Visit 11) in Calcium x Phosphate Product . An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was to be used to analyse the changes from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Day 29 (Visit 11), which were to include the fixed, categorical effects of treatment, as well as the continuous, fixed covariates of Baseline concentrations for Calcium x Phosphate Product. Only those subjects with available concentrations for both Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) and Visit 11 (Day 29) were to be included in this analysis. In CKD subjects (Stages 3-5), the clinical recommendation (KDOQI) is that serum calcium x phosphate product should be maintained at < 55 mg^2/dL^2 (4.4 mmol^2 /L^2).
Day 1 to Day 29
Change in Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating System (GSRS) Overall Score From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 29
The GSRS assesses the impact of treatment-related GI complications. It includes 15 items divided into 5 subscales (diarrhoea, indigestion, abdominal pain, constipation, and reflux), and uses a seven-grade Likert scale to assess symptoms (1 = no discomfort at all, 7 = very severe discomfort). The total score was calculated as the average score of all 15 items. If data were missing from one or more subscales, the mean of the completed items within the subscale was to be used for the subscale score, provided that more than half of the subscale items were complete. If more than half of the items within a subscale were missing, the subscale score and overall score were also to be defined as missing. The change in overall GSRS score from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29) was summarised by treatment and a two-sample t-test was to be used to identify differences between the placebo and PT20 dose groups. The higher the score, the more severe the gastrointestinal symptoms.
Day 1 to Day 29

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Geoff Block, MD, Denver Nephrologist

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 7, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 18, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

March 18, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 28, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

May 30, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 16, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2017

Last Verified

December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hyperphosphataemia

Subscribe