Evaluation of the Effects of Eccentric Training on a Cycle Ergometer, Versus Conventional Concentric Training (ENERGETIC)

July 19, 2019 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon
The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of a rehabilitation protocol based on individualized combined eccentric and concentric cycle ergometer training compared to classical concentric cycle training among patients with either coronary artery disease (CAD) or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study will therefore evaluate the efficacy of combined eccentric/concentric training on physical capacity and overall autonomy, and will analyse the adaptive mechanisms with regard to both adaptation to cardiac and muscular effort and tolerance.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The research will take place in 3 phases:

PHASE 1 :

30 healthy volunteers will be included to test tolerance to personalized exercise on an eccentric cycle ergometer.

PHASE 2 :

15 patients suffering from coronary artery disease (CAD) and 15 patients suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) will be included to test the same protocol.

PHASE 3 :

A total of 169 patients split into 2 parallel groups will be included: a group receiving conventional rehabilitation (group A) and the other group receiving eccentric exercise combined to conventional rehabilitation (group B).

Coronary patients: 93 patients will be included (62 patients in group A and 31 in group B).

COPD patients: 76 patients will be included (38 patients per group).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

212

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Besancon, France, 25000
        • CHU de Besancon
      • Dijon, France, 21079
        • Chu de Dijon

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Persons who have provided written informed consent

Healthy volunteers:

  • Men or women aged between 40 and 75 years.

Patients with CAD:

  • Men or women aged between 40 and 75 years, with coronary artery disease without heart failure referred for a rehabilitation program.
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction on echocardiography (Simpson methode) > 45 %

Patients with Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease:

  • Men or women aged between 40 and 75 years
  • Severe Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (post-bronchodilatator FEV1/FVC < 0.70 and FEV1 ≤ 60% of predicted value)
  • Patient not on oxygen therapy (24h/24)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Person without national health insurance cover
  • Severe, obstructive cardiopathy
  • Severe aortic valve stenosis,
  • Severe progressive heart rhythm or conduction disorders not corrected by a pacemaker and detected during the initial effort test
  • Cardiac intracavitary thrombus,
  • Severe pulmonary artery hypertension (PAHT systolic >70mmHg),
  • Recent history of venous thromboembolism (previous 3 months),
  • Impaired executive functions making it impossible to understand and adhere to a rehabilitation program (Mini Mental Test < 24),
  • Heart transplant,
  • Associated medical condition that could substantially affect functional capacities (examples: non-stabilized metabolic disorders such as progressive renal insufficiency, major asthenia linked to a severe non-stabilized disorder such as neoplasia, systemic disease…).
  • Physical incapacity of the lower limbs that could impair rehabilitation, whether they are neurological (central or peripheral), arterial (in particular, peripheral artery disease with a systolic index < 0.6) or orthopedic (degenerative or inflammatory rheumatism).
  • Patients who have taken part (within the previous 6 months) or a currently taking part in a rehabilitation program.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: "Conventional" group
Experimental: "Combined" group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
For patients with CAD: Distance covered during a 6-minute walk test and triceps surae maximal isometric force
Time Frame: Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
For COPD patients : Endurance time at 75 % of peak workload achieved on a cycle ergometer during the initial concentric cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET)
Time Frame: Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
For CAD patients: Functional Independence Measure
Time Frame: Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
For CAD patients: Timed up and go test
Time Frame: Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
For CAD patients: Step test with gas exchange measurement
Time Frame: Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
For CAD patients: Distance covered in the 6-minute walk test
Time Frame: Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
For CAD patients: peak VO2 and 1st ventilation adaptation threshold
Time Frame: Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
For CAD patients: VO2 measurement during the 6 minute walk test
Time Frame: Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
For CAD patients: heart rate and systolic blood pressure
Time Frame: Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
For CAD patients: cardiac output measured non-invasively
Time Frame: Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
For CAD patients: maximum isometric muscle strength of the triceps and quadriceps
Time Frame: Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
For CAD patients: tissue oxygenation measured by infrared spectroscopy (non-invasive) at the quadriceps
Time Frame: Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
For CAD patients: reaction hyperaemia in the circumflex humeral artery mesured by ultrasound
Time Frame: Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
For CAD patients: Measurement of lactates
Time Frame: Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
For COPD patients: Distance covered in the 6-minute walk test
Time Frame: Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
For COPD patients: peak VO2 and 1st ventilation adaptation threshold
Time Frame: Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
For COPD patients: SpO2 and heart rate measurement before, during and after the 6-minute walk test
Time Frame: Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
For COPD patients: SpO2 measurement and heart rate during the sessions (warm-up, end of session)
Time Frame: Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
For COPD patients: maximum isometric muscle strength of the quadriceps
Time Frame: Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
For COPD patients: arterial compliance (pulse wave velocity measurement)
Time Frame: Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
For COPD patients: Measurement of lactates
Time Frame: Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
For COPD patients: muscle composition and vascularization through muscle biopsies (optional)
Time Frame: Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
For COPD patients: St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)
Time Frame: Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
For COPD patients: Quality of life-BPCO (VQ11)
Time Frame: Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
For COPD patients: COPD Assessment Test (CAT)
Time Frame: Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
For COPD patients: BDI/TDI and mMRC dyspnea assessment
Time Frame: Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks
Between the initial evaluation (D0) and the final reconditioning evaluation, assessed up to 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 16, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 3, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

April 3, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 5, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

June 5, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 22, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CASILLAS DB 2011

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Clinical Trials on conventional rehabilitation program (including concentric cycle ergometer)

Subscribe