- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02162173
Dual Focus NBI and pCLE in FAP Related Duodenal Adenoma (PIVI)
Diagnostic Values of Dual Focus Narrow Band Imaging and Probe-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy in FAP Related Duodenal Adenoma
Background: Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patients are at risk to develop periampullary and non-ampullary adenoma. Either a routine biopsy or an endoscopic removal of the lesion is generally required to identify the presence of adenoma. However, the risk of tissue sampling from the ampulla is high and non-ampullary polyps are sometimes numerous, therefore resecting all the lesions is time consuming. To support the PIVI (Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable endoscopic Innovations) initiative, a real-time diagnosis with NPV≥ 90% is required.
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic values of duodenal adenoma by dual focus NBI (dNBI) and probe-based confocal endomicroscopy (pCLE) in FAP patients.
Design: Diagnostic study.
Setting: Single tertiary-care referral center.
Patients: Twenty-six patients with previously diagnosed with FAP.
Intervention: Surveillance EGD with dNBI and pCLE. A real time adenoma reading was done by two different endoscopists for each of the technique. Histology from the matched lesion was used as the gold standard.
Main outcome measurements: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy. With the threshold for negative predictive value (NPV) ≥ 90%
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Endoscopic procedure and criteria for adenoma diagnosis
- The endoscopic diagnostic criteria to distinguish between adenoma and non-adenoma were adopted from the previous studies by Uchiyama Y et al. in 2006. A real time adenoma diagnosis was made by the two independent endoscopists (BI and RP) who are experienced in dNBI and pCLE readings. Before entering into the study, they have experienced in reviewing the images obtained by dNBI and pCLE and published the related results elsewhere.
- During the study period, all 26 patients underwent the procedure under conscious sedation with intravenous midazolam and meperidine. Ten milligrams of hyoscine was given before the procedure to decrease intestinal peristalsis. At the beginning of the procedure, the first endoscopist (BI) used an end-viewing HWE attached with an endoscopic cap to examine the 1st and 2nd part of duodenum. The cap was used to facilitate a proper enface view of the ampulla and surrounding area. All applicable ampullary and non-ampullary (duodenal) polyps that larger than 1 millimeter would be recruited in this study. Then dNBI mode was switched on for a real-time diagnosis by the first endoscopist (BI). Subsequently, the second endoscopist (RP) who blinded to the NBI reading would be called from another room to perform pCLE examination. Two and a half milliliters of 10% fluorescein (Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, Bangkok, Thailand) was injected during pCLE evaluation. When there were more than one non-ampulary lesions, the first endoscopist only navigated the lesions to study under pCLE to the second endoscopist without telling the result of dNBI reading. Then, the matched polypectomy or biopsy was performed by the second endoscopist. The duration of the entire procedure and all complications related to the procedures were recorded.
Histological assessment - All polypectomy and biopsy specimens were immersed in formalin and sent for histological examination. The specimens were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and reviewed by an experienced GI pathologist (NW) blinded to the endoscopic diagnosis. The definite diagnosis was based on the Vienna classification for differentiation between adenoma and non-adenoma.
Statistical Analysis
-By using histology as the gold standard, the diagnostic values of dNBI and pCLE for ampullary and non-ampullary polyp interpretation were assessed for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy. According to PIVI recommendation for colonic adenoma diagnosis20, we used the 90% NPV readings as our cut off. For numerical variables, the results were expressed as a mean ± SD, whereas other quantitative variables are expressed as percentages. SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS (Thailand) Co., Ltd., Bangkok, Thailand) for Windows systems was used for statistical analysis.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Bangkok
-
Patumwan, Bangkok, Thailand, 10330
- King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years of age or older with a history of FAP
- Patients who able to provide a written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Evidence of coagulopathy (INR ≥ 1.5 and/or platelet < 80,000)
- Other bleeding tendency precluding biopsy
- Pregnancy
- allergy to fluorescein sodium
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Endoscopy
All patients underwent the same endoscopy.
|
Endoscopist performed white light endoscopy for polyp detection, then switch to dual focus NBI for characterization.
Then probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy was applied for characterization by another endoscopist independently and finally biopsy.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
duodenal adenoma diagnosis
Time Frame: 1 year
|
1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- RP007
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Complication of Diagnostic Procedure
-
Hypnalgesics, LLCDuke University; Ohio State UniversityCompletedClaustrophobia | Complication of Diagnostic ProcedureUnited States
-
Hypnalgesics, LLCBoston Medical Center; Ohio State University; Tufts Medical CenterCompletedClaustrophobia | Complication of Diagnostic ProcedureUnited States
-
Eske Kvanner AasvangCompletedComplication of Surgical Procedure | Respiratory Complication | Complication of Anesthesia | Circulatory; ComplicationsDenmark
-
Hannover Medical SchoolKarolinska Institutet; Helsinki University Central Hospital; University of Leipzig and other collaboratorsRecruitingComplication of Surgical ProcedureGermany
-
Stanford UniversityActive, not recruitingComplication of Surgical ProcedureUnited States
-
Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la...UnknownComplication of Surgical ProcedureSpain
-
Zeyong YangUniversity of PennsylvaniaCompletedComplication of Surgical Procedure
-
Hannover Medical SchoolRecruitingComplication of Surgical ProcedureGermany
-
Hospital General Universitario ElcheDr. Negrin University HospitalCompletedCardiovascular Risk Factors of Medical and Septic Complications After Laparoscopic Bariatric SurgeryComplication of Surgical Procedure
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedPatients Requiring a Diagnostic and/or Interventional Diagnostic ProcedureGermany
Clinical Trials on Endoscopy
-
Chinese University of Hong KongCompletedGastrointestinal Bleeding | Bleeding Peptic Ulcer | Active BleedingChina
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityUnknownInterventional Endoscopy Database for Pancreatico-biliary, Gastrointestinal and Esophageal DisordersColorectal Cancer | Pancreatic Cancer | Esophageal Cancer | Cholangiocarcinoma | Bile Duct Cancer | Cholangitis | Barrett's Esophagus | Gallstones | Choledocholithiasis | Bile Leak | Obstructive Jaundice | Duodenal Cancer | Pancreatic Pseudocysts | Ampullary Cancer | Biliary Strictures | Recurrent Pancreatitis | Bile Duct... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Unidade Local De Saúde Do Norte AlentejanoNOVA Medical SchoolRecruiting
-
Jagiellonian UniversityCompleted
-
University Medical Center GroningenMaastricht University Medical Center; Erasmus Medical Center; Medtronic - MITG; Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) and other collaboratorsCompletedLynch Syndrome | Small Bowel NeoplasiaNetherlands
-
Hvidovre University HospitalTerminatedUpper Gastrointestinal Disease,UlcersDenmark
-
Technical University of MunichRotkreuzklinikum München gGmbH; Klinikum Freising; Klinikum Landshut-Achdorf; Städtisches... and other collaboratorsCompletedEndoscopic Diagnosis in EsophagusGermany
-
Dallas VA Medical CenterCompleted
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityEthicon, Inc.WithdrawnEsophageal and Gastric VaricesUnited States
-
University Hospital, MontpellierTerminatedthe Management of Weight Regain After Gastric Bypass by Endoscopic SuturingFrance