Trial of an Alternate Mode of Providing Artificial Breaths to Children With Very Severe Pneumonia (APRiCE)

May 17, 2017 updated by: Dr. Saptharishi L G, MBBS, MD, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research

A Parallel-arm, Single Blind Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing 'AIRWAY PRESSURE RELEASE VENTILATION' and 'LOW-TIDAL VOLUME VENTILATION' in Children With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

This study attempts to study a new ventilation mode in children with Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Despite decades of research, no intervention has brought about a significant decrease in ARDS mortality. Moreover, most of the studies are adult-based and have been extrapolated to children. Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) mode is hypothesized to be superior in terms of lower need for sedation, shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, etc. It is unique and the first worldwide randomized controlled trial on APRV mode in children.

We plan to recruit a minimum of 50 children aged (1 month-12 years) in each group. The study is to be conducted at the Post-Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh between March 2014 to March 2016. This trial would recruit children with respiratory failure and early ARDS and, randomize them to receive either conventional ventilation or the APRV mode. Rest of the supportive care has also been protocolized so that both groups receive treatment as per the existing best practices in every aspect. The primary outcome being studied is the number of ventilator-free days. The secondary outcomes include length of PICU stay, hospital stay, organ-failure free days, 28 day & 3 month survival, biomarkers of lung injury (IL-6, IL-8, Angiopoeitin-2, soluble-ICAM-1, etc), functional status, Pulmonary function tests, etc. Funding request would be sent to the Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.

Assessing lung biomarkers like Interleukin-6 would assess the role of different modes of ventilation in acting as triggers for multi-organ dysfunction as well as for worsening lung injury. This pathbreaking research is likely to open up new avenues upon completion.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Study setting:

15-bedded pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of a multi-specialty, tertiary referral and teaching hospital- the Advanced Pediatrics Centre (APC) in Post-Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India Study period Recruitment: January 2014 to December 2016 Data Analysis: Jan 2017 to June 2017 Study design An open-labelled, parallel-arm, efficacy/feasibility randomized controlled trial Ethics approval Ethics approval has been obtained from the Institute Ethics Committee. The study has been registered with Clinical Trials Registry - India (CTRI) (ctri.nic.in). Informed consent will be obtained from the parents/legal guardian and the conversation would be recorded using a camera (audio-visual documentation of evidence).

Sample size estimation Assuming alpha error of 5% and power of 80% with non-inferiority limit of 4 days (Standard deviation of VFDs being 8.2 days in the conventional low tidal volume ventilation group in pilot trial), sample size was calculated to be 52 per group. As this is a safety and feasibility trial, an interim analysis would be done at 50% enrolment.

Enrolment Parents or legal guardians of children who satisfy the above eligibility criteria will be invited by the investigator to participate in the study. Parents are free not to participate, or to withdraw from the study at any point of time. All children, irrespective of their enrollment in the study, will receive standard pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) care as per the unit's existing protocol. An information sheet (in Hindi/ English) furnishing details of the study will be provided to the parents. Given the fact that all these children are sedated and on mechanical ventilation, obtaining assent would not be feasible in this study.

Randomization Sequence generation A computer-generated, unstratified, block randomization with variable block sizes will be performed to determine group allocation. A person not involved in the study will perform the random number allocation and prepare opaque, sealed envelopes containing the allocation.

Concealment allocation Each pre-sealed opaque envelope would be opened only after obtaining a written consent and audio-visual record of the same. As the randomization is done using a variable block size, and prepared by a statistician not directly involved in the study, there would be no way of predicting the random allocation, thus minimizing the risk of allocation bias.

Randomization implementation After parents provide informed consent, randomization would be done within the next one hour and child initiated on appropriate mode of ventilation. The supportive care for both the groups, would be as per the attached supplementary protocols

Intervention protocol:

The Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) intervention protocol has been designed based on the available APRV literature as of Dec 2013.

Start the child on APRV mode of ventilation with the following settings:

  • P HIGH would determine the degree of baseline lung inflation. A rough estimate can be obtained based on the plateau pressure requirements on the conventional mode of ventilation. Perform an inspiratory hold to ascertain the plateau pressures:

    • If P plateau > 30 cm water, set P HIGH at 30 cm water
    • If P plateau < 30 cm water, set P HIGH at or 1-2 cm above the measured P plateau.
  • Alternatively, if P plateau cannot be measured, P HIGH can be set according to the following guide:

PaO2/ FiO2 ratio P High < 250 15-20 < 200 20-25 < 150 25-28

After initiating a particular P HIGH, a clinical assessment of lung volume needs to be followed with a chest radiograph to determine the degree of lung inflation (similar to setting of Mean airway pressure in High frequency oscillatory mode of ventilation). The child's P HIGH is adjusted to maintain optimal lung volume, without clinical or radiological evidence of hyperinflation: no signs of decreased cardiac output/ hypotension and/or the level of the diaphragm visible greater than the ninth rib.

  • Start at T High of 4 seconds; Titrate T High based on oxygenation status. At least 80 -95% of the total cycle time should be spent in T High.
  • Set P Low at Zero cm H2O
  • Set T Low so that expiratory flow decreases by 25 % of peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR); usually 0.1-0.8 seconds. The ratio of T-PEFR to PEFR should be targeted near 75%. This entity needs to be titrated every 2-4 hours and may have to be shortened as lung injury advances.
  • Set Pressure Support at ZERO
  • The number of breaths per minute or number of releases is a function of T High and T Low as depicted below:

Weaning from APRV would also be carried out in a structured, protocolized manner. The following strategies would be adopted:

  1. As child's clinical condition and oxygenation index improves, and Fraction of inspired oxygen levels are brought down to 0.6, T HIGH is increased in steps of 0.5-2 seconds till it is 10-12 seconds.
  2. P HIGH can be subsequently decreased in steps of 2-3 cm H2O till a value of 12-16 is reached. Decrease in P HIGH can be carried out earlier if features of hyperinflation (clinical/radiological) appear at any point.
  3. The goal is to reach pressure levels of 12-16 cm H2O and then switch to Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) of 6-8 cm H2O, from which child can be extubated directly to nasal prong CPAP or gradually tapered off CPAP to Endotracheal-T piece and subsequently extubated depending on the overall clinical status.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Chandigarh, India, 160012
        • Pediatric Intensive care unit, Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Advanced Pediatrics Center, Post-graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 month to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children aged 1 month- 12 years, who are intubated and mechanically ventilated with the following criteria of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome:

    1. Acute presentation within 1 week of a known clinical insult or new/ worsening respiratory symptoms
    2. Bilateral opacities on chest imaging - not fully explained by effusions, lobar/lung collapse, or nodules
    3. Respiratory failure is not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload (Echocardiographic assessment to exclude hydrostatic edema)
    4. Impaired oxygenation with PaO2/ FiO2 ratio less than 300 or Oxygenation Index greater than 5.3

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Greater than 24 hours since diagnosis of ARDS
  • Co-existing raised intra-cranial pressure/ any other condition necessitating use of high dose of sedation (likely to suppress spontaneous breathing)
  • Radiologically confirmed air leak prior to randomization - Pneumothorax/ Pulmonary interstitial Emphysema
  • Clinical evidence of significant airway obstruction/ severe bronchospasm / reactive airway disease
  • Have received mechanical ventilation for more than 72 hours (before meeting inclusion criteria)
  • Symptomatic or uncorrected congenital heart disease or a right to left intra-cardiac shunt
  • Any underlying condition that is likely to impair spontaneous respiratory drive/ efforts (Eg: Brainstem dysfunction, neuromuscular paralysis)
  • Underlying chronic diseases (Eg: Cystic fibrosis, Chronic lung disease, etc)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Airway pressure release ventilation arm

This group of children would be ventilated using the Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) mode.

Restrictive fluid therapy, protocolized sedo-analgesia titration, steroid therapy, protocolized supportive care, protocolized early enteral nutrition would be provided to both the groups. Biomarkers would be measured in both groups.

This is a newer mode of ventilation that has been hypothesized to be equivalent or even superior to the conventional low-tidal volume mode of ventilation
Other Names:
  • BiPAP
  • BiLevel
Children with primary ARDS presenting within the first 14 days would receive IV low dose Methylprednisolone infusion.
Fluid & hemodynamics would be titrated as per pre-designed decision-making protocols
Early enteral nutrition and attempt to meet calorie-protein goals
Eye care, chlorhexidine mouth wash Q6 hourly, Strict aseptic precautions prior to any procedures, Skin care & bed sore prevention, Adequate pulmonary toileting and chest physiotherapy, frequent position changes, limb physiotherapy, family-centered care
Biomarker Assay for patients in both arms
Other Names:
  • Interleukin 6, Interleukin 8, Angiopoeitin-2, soluble-ICAM-1
Active Comparator: Low-tidal volume ventilation arm
Low-tidal volume ventilation using pressure-regulated volume control mode with target tidal volume of 6 ml/kg or less and other lung-protective strategies. Restrictive fluid therapy, protocolized sedo-analgesia titration, steroid therapy, protocolized supportive care, protocolized early enteral nutrition would be provided to both the groups. Biomarkers would be measured in both groups
Children with primary ARDS presenting within the first 14 days would receive IV low dose Methylprednisolone infusion.
Fluid & hemodynamics would be titrated as per pre-designed decision-making protocols
Early enteral nutrition and attempt to meet calorie-protein goals
Eye care, chlorhexidine mouth wash Q6 hourly, Strict aseptic precautions prior to any procedures, Skin care & bed sore prevention, Adequate pulmonary toileting and chest physiotherapy, frequent position changes, limb physiotherapy, family-centered care
Biomarker Assay for patients in both arms
Other Names:
  • Interleukin 6, Interleukin 8, Angiopoeitin-2, soluble-ICAM-1
This mode of ventilation is the standard of care worldwide for ventilating children with ARDS.
Other Names:
  • Lung-protective ventilation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Twenty-eight-day ventilator-free days
Time Frame: 28 days
28 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Twenty-eight-day survival
Time Frame: 28 days
28 days
Length of PICU stay
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
The children would be followed up for the duration of their PICU stay
Up to 3 months
Organ-failure-free-days
Time Frame: 28 days
28 days
Time-to-recovery of lung injury
Time Frame: Up to 28 days
Number of days for recovery of lung injury (OI<5).
Up to 28 days
Number of children with adverse events
Time Frame: 3 years
Children would be observed for incidence of adverse events during the period of PICU stay/ ventilation
3 years
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: Three months
Three months
Spirometry
Time Frame: 3 months
Forced Expiratory volume during 1st second/ Forced vital capacity
3 months
Pediatric Cerebral performance category
Time Frame: 6 Months
Functional outcomes
6 Months
Pediatric Overall performance category
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Spirometry
Time Frame: 6 months
Forced Expiratory Volume during 1st second / Forced Vital Capacity
6 months
Pediatric overall performance category
Time Frame: 3 months
Assessment of functional outcomes
3 months
Pediatric cerebral performance category
Time Frame: 3 months
Assessment of functional outcomes
3 months
Interleukin-6 levels
Time Frame: 72 hours of enrolment
72 hours of enrolment
Arterial lactate levels
Time Frame: 72 hours
72 hours
Percentage reduction in 'oxygenation Index'
Time Frame: 6 hours
Percentage improvement in oxygenation index at 6 hours of enrolment
6 hours
Radiological score
Time Frame: 48 hours
48 hours
Duration of inotropic requirement
Time Frame: up to 7 days
Average time frame
up to 7 days
Vaso-active inotropic score
Time Frame: 72 hours
72 hours
Cumulative dose of sedation
Time Frame: 7 days
7 days
Cumulative dose of analgesic
Time Frame: 7 days
7 days
Cumulative dose of neuromuscular blocking agent
Time Frame: 7 days
7 days
Requirement for renal replacement therapy
Time Frame: 28 days
Need for renal replacement therapy in the first 28 days of PICu stay or discharge/ death whichever is earlier
28 days
Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction (PELOD) score
Time Frame: 7 days
7 days

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment rate
Time Frame: 3 years
Number of children recruited per month on an average
3 years
Rate of enrolment among eligible children
Time Frame: 3 years
Feasibility outcome Number of children who get enrolled in the study after consent among all eligible children
3 years
Contamination rate
Time Frame: 3 years
Proportion of recruited children who cross-over from one arm to another
3 years
Attrition rate
Time Frame: 3 months
Proportion of children who are lost to follow-up at 3 months
3 months
Protocol adherence rate
Time Frame: 3 years
Proportion of children where all supportive care protocols are adhered to.
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Saptharishi L G, MBBS, MD, DM (Pediatric Critical Care) Senior Resident, Division of Pediatric critical care, Dept Of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Center, PGIMER, Chandigarh, INDIA
  • Study Chair: Jayashree Muralidharan, MBBS, MD, Additional Professor, Division of Pediatric critical care, Dept of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Center, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
  • Study Director: Sunit C Singhi, MBBS, MD, Chief, Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Professor & Head, Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Center, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
  • Study Chair: Arun Bansal, MBBS, MD, Assistant Professor, Division of Pediatric Critical care, Dept of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Center, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 16, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

June 19, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)

Clinical Trials on Airway Pressure Release Ventilation (APRV)

Subscribe