- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02211092
Feasibility Study of a Home-based Physical Activity Intervention for Family Caregivers of People With Advanced Cancer
Development and Pilot Testing of a Home-Based Physical Activity Intervention for Family Caregivers of People With Advanced Cancer
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Quebec
-
Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3T 1E2
- Jewish General Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years of age or older
- able to speak and read English
- involved in the care of a person with advanced cancer (stage III or IV) at home
Exclusion Criteria:
- already participating in physical activity more than three days a week and 30 minutes or more per session as assessed by self-report
- a current mental illness that has been treated with medication for <8 weeks or that the caregiver intends to initiate medication for during the period of the intervention
- any major physical health problem that would prevent caregivers from participating in the intervention as assessed by the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Physical activity intervention
A 12 week individually tailored home-based physical activity program with goal-setting, a physical activity self-monitoring technique, and weekly telephone calls provided by the intervener for coaching and support.
|
A 12 week individually tailored home-based physical activity program with goal-setting, a physical activity self-monitoring technique, and weekly telephone calls provided by the intervener for coaching and support.
|
|
Other: Usual care
Access to usual community resources but no active lifestyle coaching.
|
Access to usual community resources but no active lifestyle coaching.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of recruitment
Time Frame: 9 months of running feasibility trial
|
Frequency counts of the number of participants recruited from each of the recruitment sites will be conducted and the overall rate of recruitment will be calculated. This criterion for advancing to a full RCT will be met if the estimated sample size required for a full RCT can likely be recruited in 2 years. |
9 months of running feasibility trial
|
|
Number of participants who drop out
Time Frame: 9 months of running feasibility trial
|
Frequency counts for the number of participants who drop out of both the experimental and control group will be conducted and the percentage rate of attrition in each group will be calculated. This criterion for advancing to a full RCT will be met if less than 30% of participants dropped out of the experimental or control group. |
9 months of running feasibility trial
|
|
Number of items complete on the outcome questionnaires
Time Frame: Baseline, 6, 9, and 12 weeks
|
To assess acceptability of outcome questionnaires and feasibility of data collection procedures for a full RCT, descriptive statistics (frequency counts) of complete versus incomplete items as well as the expected versus actual completion dates will be conducted at baseline, and week 6, 9, and 12 for both the experimental and control group on the following outcome measures: Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS); Lee Fatigue Scale (LFS); General Self-Rated Health question. This criterion for advancing to a full RCT will be met if less than 10% of items on each of the questionnaires are missing and less than 10% of participants are missing any one item on each of the questionnaires. |
Baseline, 6, 9, and 12 weeks
|
|
Rate of adherence to individual physical activity plans
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
The number of weeks that participants were able to engage in physical activity levels at or above their retrospective baseline physical activity level in relation to the number of weeks that they were in the study will be calculated. Rate of adherence will be calculated for individual participants and the mean and median rate of adherence will be calculated for the experimental group. The proportion of participants that were able to engage in physical activity at or above their retrospective baseline level of physical activity 0-25%, 26-50%, 51-75%, and 76-100% of the time will be calculated. Qualitative data will also be collected and analyzed to explore what factors influence adherence to the individual physical activity plans. This criterion for advancing to a full RCT will be met if the rate of adherence to the individual PA plans is greater than or equal to 75%. |
12 weeks
|
|
Level of and change in physical activity levels
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
The mean number of Metabolic Equivalent Task (MET) hours per week that participants engaged in physical activity as well as the number of minutes per week that participants engaged in light, moderate, and vigorous intensity PA for each of the experimental and control groups will be calculated.
|
12 weeks
|
|
Level of adherence to physical activity intervention
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
The number of weeks that each participant missed receiving the intervention will be calculated.
In addition, qualitative data will be collected to assess the pattern of missed weeks for each participant including the reasons that any weeks were missed.
|
12 weeks
|
|
Level of adherence to intervention delivery
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
An intervention fidelity audit will be conducted.
The percentage of audited participants that engaged in each of the main components of intervention delivery (i.e pre-baseline home visit, baseline home visit, and weekly telephone calls) will be calculated.
In addition, the percentage of individual intervention delivery criteria items that were met in each component will be calculated for each audited participant.
|
12 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Caregivers' perception of the acceptability of the intervention
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Qualitative data will be collected during the weekly telephone calls and follow-up interviews to evaluate the acceptability of the structure, content, and process of the physical activity intervention. This criterion for advancing to a full RCT will be met if <10% of participants report major complaints about the intervention. |
12 weeks
|
|
Caregivers' perception of benefits and/or risks of intervention
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Qualitative data will be collected at the follow-up interviews to determine caregivers' overall perception of whether or not and in what ways the physical activity intervention impacted them.
|
12 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jamie L Penner, RN, PhD(c), McGill University; Jewish General Hospital
- Principal Investigator: S Robin Cohen, PhD, McGill University; Jewish General Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 13-129
- 003208 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Canadian Institutes of Health Research)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Self Care
-
Stanford UniversityCompletedSelf-care | Self-Compassion | Self-care Agency | Self-kindness | Self-valuationUnited States
-
TED UniversityCompleted
-
Akdeniz UniversityUnknownPeritoneal Dialysis | Self Efficacy | Perceived Social Support | Self-CareTurkey
-
Atlas UniversityCompletedDialysis | Self Care | SymptomsTurkey
-
University of VictoriaSwitch Research; Mathematics of Information Technology and Complex SystemsCompletedMental Health | Self CareCanada
-
Universidad de la SabanaNot yet recruitingHeart Failure | Transitional Care | Self-careColombia
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityRecruitingOlder Adults | Mobile Health | Self-Care | Homebound | Person-Centred CareHong Kong
-
Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam UniversityNot yet recruitingSelf-Care | Genital Hygiene Behaviors
-
University of BarcelonaRecruitingSelf Care | Climactericum | Climacteric SymptomsSpain
-
Mansoura UniversityActive, not recruitingUrostomy Patients | Self-Care PracticesEgypt
Clinical Trials on Physical activity intervention
-
Brown UniversityNational Cancer Institute (NCI); National Institutes of Health (NIH)Completed
-
University of ConnecticutNational Institutes of Health (NIH); National Center for Complementary and...CompletedChronic Low Back PainUnited States
-
Institut Català d'OncologiaUnknownRecurrence | Breast NeoplasmsSpain
-
The Miriam HospitalUnknownStroke | Sedentary Lifestyle | Ischemic Attack, Transient | ExerciseUnited States
-
Brown UniversityNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedInactivity, PhysicalUnited States
-
University of California, DavisActive, not recruitingBehavior, HealthUnited States
-
Jamie JacksonCompletedPhysical Activity | Cardiovascular Disease OtherUnited States
-
Jamie JacksonNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)CompletedPhysical Activity | Cardiovascular Disease OtherUnited States
-
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterUnknownObesity | Overweight | Learning DisabilityIsrael
-
University of MinnesotaCompletedPhysical InactivityUnited States