- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02218463
Treatment of Prepubertal Labial Adhesions
Treatment of Prepubertal Labial Adhesions: A Prospective Comparison of Topical Emollient Versus Topical Estrogen.
First-line treatment for labial adhesions in prepubertal girls has been topical estrogen. This study aims to evaluate an alternative and less costly option of treatment with potentially less side effects.
Primary Hypothesis:
There will be a difference in complete resolution of labial adhesions with topical estrogen with lateral traction as compared to an emollient with lateral traction.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The etiology of labial adhesions is unclear but appears to be related to hypoestrogenism in combination with vulvar irritation. For many years, first-line treatment for labial adhesions in prepubertal girls has been topical estrogen. With the use of topical estrogen, 50% of labial adhesions resolve in 2 to 3 weeks and most labial adhesions resolve with 6 weeks of treatment. However, because topical estrogen is systemically absorbed, its use is associated with side effects such as breast budding, vulvar hyperpigmentation, vaginal bleeding. There is a high risk of recurrence of labial adhesions of up to 35% after treatment with topical estrogen. In addition, topical estrogen is costly. Therefore, there continues to be controversy over the optimal treatment of labial adhesions in prepubertal girls.
Generally, for medical treatment of labial adhesions, topical estrogen is applied to the adhesion whist applying gentle lateral traction to promote separation of the labia. It is, therefore, plausible that the lateral traction applied to the adhesion site is what ultimately results in the separation of the labial fusion, while the use of estrogen improves healing after mechanical separation.
This is a single site, prospective, randomized, double-blinded study evaluating the comparative effectiveness of topical estrogen with lateral traction versus topical emollient with lateral traction for the treatment of labial adhesions in prepubertal girls.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Missouri
-
Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64108
- Children's Mercy Hospitals & Clinics
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Prepubertal girls ages 3 months to 12 years with labial adhesions
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of underlying dermatologic conditions such as lichen sclerosis, severe atopic dermatitis, psoriasis or vitiligo
- Presence of systemic conditions that can have vulvar manifestations such as Crohn's disease and Behçet disease
- Presence of disorders requiring immunosuppressant treatment
- Previous surgical separation of labial adhesions
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Cetaphil
Apply a pea-sized amount to the labial adhesion with lateral traction twice daily
|
Apply a pea-sized amount to the labial adhesion with lateral traction twice daily
|
|
Active Comparator: Estradiol Cream 0.01%
Apply a pea-sized amount to the labial adhesion with lateral traction twice daily
|
Apply a pea-sized amount to the labial adhesion with lateral traction twice daily
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Complete Resolution of Labial Adhesion.
Time Frame: 3 weeks and 6 weeks
|
The first assessment will be 3 weeks after initiation of treatment.
The final assessment will be 6 weeks after initiation of treatment.
|
3 weeks and 6 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Composite Severity Scale of Labial Adhesion Over Time
Time Frame: 3 weeks and 6 weeks
|
Response to treatment of labial adhesion is dependent not only upon the size of the adhesion but also the thickness.
A more accurate measurement of response to treatment would, therefore, incorporate both measurements.
For this study, the percentage of closure of the introitus at presentation was assigned an ordinal value as follows: 1=25%, 2=50%, 3=75%, and 4=100%.
The degree of thickness of the labial adhesion was also measured in a similar fashion: 1=thin, 2=intermediate and 3= thick.
Those that were resolved received a rating of 0 on both scales.
A composite severity scale was created by multiplying the value assigned to the percentage of introital closure by that assigned to the thickness of the adhesion for each of the 3 study visits.
The composite severity scale ranged from 0 to 12.
This allowed a comparison of treatment effect between each group over time wherein a lower composite severity score corresponded to a less severe labial adhesion.
|
3 weeks and 6 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Tazim Dowlut-McElroy, MD, University of Missouri, Kansas City
- Study Director: Julie L Strickland, MD, MPH, University of Missouri-Kansas City; Children's Mercy Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CMH14010039
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Prepubertal Labial Adhesions
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedImmediate Implants | Esthetic Zone | Labial Bone Dimensional Changes | Without Labial Bone Grafting | With Labial Grafting | Thin Labial Plate of Bone Pre-extractionEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Cairo UniversityUnknown
-
Cairo UniversityRecruiting
-
Tanta UniversityRecruitingFemale | Urethroplasty | Oral Mucosal Graft | Labial GraftEgypt
-
Public Dental Health in Uppsala RegionGöteborg UniversityCompleted
-
Faculty of Dental Medicine for GirlsCompletedAmount of Labial Bone Thickness | Amount of Root ResorptionEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityRecruitingJumping Gap | Guided Immediate Implant Placement | Labial Bone Thickness Change | Broken Down Tooth RehabilitationEgypt
-
Karnataka Institute of Medical SciencesCompletedTissue Adhesions | Nasal Synechiae | Adhesions of Nasal Cavity | Nasal AdhesionsIndia
-
Tanta UniversityEnrolling by invitationThin Labial Plate of Bone Pre-extraction | Immediate Dental Implants | Hopeless Tooth in Esthetic ZoneEgypt
Clinical Trials on Cetaphil
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesCompleted
-
Galderma R&DCompletedAtopic DermatitisPhilippines, China
-
Galderma R&DYoung Skin MDCompletedDiaper RashUnited States
-
Galderma R&DCompletedSkin IrritationUnited States
-
Galderma R&DCompletedPsoriasis | Plaque PsoriasisUnited States
-
Galderma R&DCompletedSkin IrritationUnited States
-
Shari L HandTopMD Skin Care, Inc.TerminatedEczema | Atopic Dermatitis | Hand EczemaUnited States
-
Biocool ABCompleted
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityGalderma R&DCompletedAtopic DermatitisUnited States
-
Wake Forest UniversityStiefel, a GSK CompanyCompleted