Improving Quality of Life in Nursing Home Residents: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial of Efficacy (KOSMOS)

April 14, 2016 updated by: Bettina Husebo, University of Bergen

Improving Quality of Life in Nursing Home Residents: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial of Efficacy (The KOSMOS Study)

Improving quality of life (QoL) in residents of nursing homes:

A cluster randomized clinical trial of efficacy - The KOSMOS study.

COSMOS (COmmunication (Advance Care Planning - ACP), Systematic pain assessment and treatment, Medication review, Occupational therapy, and Safety) is a practical intervention aimed to improve clinical and psychiatric challenges in NH patients. The COSMOS intervention combines the most effective research results to improve staff competence and patients' mental health, safety, QoL. We also aim to reduce psychotropic drug use and costs.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Nursing home (NH) patients have complex mental health problems, disabilities and social needs, compounded by widespread prescription of psychotropic drugs. To preserve their dignity and quality of life is an important goal of our society. This can only be achieved within NHs that offer high competent conditions of treatment and care.

Research questions and hypotheses:

  1. Will the implementation of a communication and end-of-life decision making process have impact on interactions between patients, staff and family? We hypothesize that ACP will improve the interactions between patients, staff and family, and satisfaction in relatives and thereby improve the quality of life NH patients.
  2. Is the KOSMOS capable to affect agitation and aggression and reduce medication e.g. psychotropics in NH patient? We hypothesize that KOSMOS will significantly reduce agitation and aggression, the total amount of medication, and psychotropic drug use.
  3. What combination of interventions will give the broadest benefit, and could be delivered as a routine intervention as part of NH practice? We hypothesize that the comprehensive KOSMOS approach improves QoL and makes positive changes in NH practice.
  4. What other types of advantages are expected? We hypothesize that KOSMOS is a cost-effective approach, with potential to increase the safety and reduce mortality in NH patients.

Method: The KOSMOS intervention combines the most effective research results to improve staff competence, and patients' mental health, safety, QoL, and to reduce psychotropic drug use and costs. The efficacy testing of KOSMOS includes systematic literature review, a pilot study, a 9-month randomized control trial (RCT), and a dissemination plan. Data collection will take place at baseline, months 4, and 9. The intervention entails provision of staff training, study guidelines and manuals. NHs will be randomized to either KOSMOS or current best practice. We will include 38 NH long-term-care (LTC) wards (normally just one ward per NH) in Bergen, Stavanger, Oslo/Bærum, Sarpsborg and Sogn and Fjordane. In total 310 patients ≥65 years will be recruited from these wards

Primary and secondary outcome measures: Quality of life in late stage dementia (QUALID), QUALIDEM, EQ-5-D; Neuropsychiatric Inventory - NH edition (NPI-NH); Activities of Daily Living (ADL); Cornell; Mobilization - Observation - Behaviour - Intensity - Dementia 2 (MOBID-2); drug use; drug-related problems, START; STOP; cost-utility analysis (RUD-FOCA); hospital admission; and mortality, ActiWatch; Log registration of NH activities; Relatives satisfaction with conducted KOSMOS elements

Statistical analyses: include characteristics between 2 groups (Chi square, Mann-Whitney U), ANCOVA, ICC and p-values for each time-point and outcomes.

National and international collaboration: National collaboration between researchers at the Universities of Bergen, Oslo, and Stavanger is established. Internationally, colleagues from the EU COST-Action TD1005, Karolinska University, Stockholm and Kings College, London are engaged in this RCT.

Funding: The employment of two PhD-candidates (100%) and one post-doctoral fellow (50%) received funding by the Norwegian Research Council (Sponsor's Protocol Code: 222113) in 2012.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

560

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Askøy, Norway
        • Ask bo og omsorgssenter
      • Bergen, Norway
        • Arna helseheim
      • Bergen, Norway
        • Frieda Fasmers minne
      • Bergen, Norway
        • Gullstøltunet Sykehjem
      • Bergen, Norway
        • Hospitalet Betanien
      • Bergen, Norway
        • Lyngbøtunet Bo og servicesenter
      • Bergen, Norway
        • Slettebakken menighets eldresenter
      • Bergen, Norway
        • University of Bergen
      • Kvam, Norway
        • Strandebarmheimen
      • Kvam, Norway
        • Toloheimen
      • Kvam, Norway
        • Øysteseheimen
      • Sarpsborg, Norway
        • Borgen sykehjem
      • Sarpsborg, Norway
        • Eplehagen bofellesskap
      • Sarpsborg, Norway
        • Haugvoll sykehjem
      • Sarpsborg, Norway
        • Helsehuset
      • Sarpsborg, Norway
        • Kurland
      • Sarpsborg, Norway
        • Tingvoll sykehjem
      • Sarpsborg, Norway
        • Valaskjold omsorgssenter
      • Sund, Norway
        • Sundheimen
      • Øygarden, Norway
        • Tednebakkane omsorgssenter
    • Akershus
      • Baerum, Akershus, Norway, 1304
        • Solvik
      • Baerum, Akershus, Norway, 1346
        • Donski Bo og behandlingssenter
      • Baerum, Akershus, Norway, 1346
        • Mariehaven Bo og behandlingssenter
      • Baerum, Akershus, Norway, 1349
        • Berger Bo og Behandlingssenter
      • Baerum, Akershus, Norway, 1352
        • Kolaashjemmet Bo og Behandlingssenter
      • Baerum, Akershus, Norway, 1354
        • Gullhaug Bo og behandlingssenter
      • Baerum, Akershus, Norway, 1361
        • Osteraas Bo og behandlingssenter
      • Baerum, Akershus, Norway, 1361
        • Solbakken Bo og Behandlingssenter
      • Baerum, Akershus, Norway, 1362
        • Lønnås Bo og Rehabsenter
      • Baerum, Akershus, Norway, 1369
        • Nordraaksvei bo og behandlingssenter
      • Baerum, Akershus, Norway, 1369
        • Stabaekktunet Bo og behandlingssenter
      • Baerum, Akershus, Norway, 1369
        • Stabekk Bo og Behandlingssenter

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Resident in long time care ward in Bergen, Bærum, Sarpsborg, Kvam, Fjell, Sund, Askøy and Øygarden

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dying patients with reduced consciousness at baseline
  • Active Schizophrenia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Active Comparator: Intervention
Communication Systematic Pain Assessment and Treatment Medication Review Occupational therapy Safety
A preparation process before the patient become incapable of participating in life prolonging decisions
Other Names:
  • advance care planning
Assess pain with MOBID-2 Pain Scale and thereby improve pain management in dementia.
Other Names:
  • MOBID-2
An individual and systematic review of medication prescriptions to identify possible harmful drug effects and to reduce the use of psychotropic drugs.
Increase individual activities, based on function, personal interest and personality by educating the staff on these elements.
Focusing on developing a culture where staff has an active and constant awareness of how to prevent adverse events and a commitment to safety.
Other Names:
  • patient safety

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neuropsychiatric symptoms
Time Frame: 9 months
Depression, anxiety an apathy will be assessed by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory - Nursing Home version (NPI-NH).
9 months
Quality of life
Time Frame: 9 months
Assessing quality of life by Qualidem, QUALID and EQ-5D.
9 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Activities of daily living
Time Frame: 9 months
Assessed by ADL index (range 0-18).
9 months
Mood or depression
Time Frame: 9 months
Assessed by Cornell Depression Scale (range 0-38)
9 months
Pain
Time Frame: 9 months
Assessed by Mobilisation-Observation-Behaviour-Intensity-Dementia (MOBID-2) Pain Scale (range 0-10)
9 months
Medication review
Time Frame: 9 months
Use of medication in number of people and dose, especially use of psychotropic drugs
9 months
Drug-related problems
Time Frame: 9 months
number of drug-drug-interactions using interactions database, number of drugs prescribed, number of anticholinergics prescribed, number of patients prescribed pain-medication with no pain on the MOBID-2 pain scale, number of patients with anti depressants with a low cornell depression rating scale in dementia.
9 months
Admission to hospital and mortality
Time Frame: 9 months
Questionnaire asking nurses wether the patient has been admitted to the hospital at month 4 and month 9.
9 months
Cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: 9 months
Resource use will be registered by Resource use in dementia - formal care (RUD-FOCA)
9 months
Cost of medication
Time Frame: 9 months
Cost-utility analysis will be performed
9 months
Measure of activity
Time Frame: 9 months
ActiWatch to register sleep and activity
9 months
Nursing home activity
Time Frame: 9 months
Log registration of NH activities
9 months
Relatives satisfaction with conducted KOSMOS elements
Time Frame: 9 months
Relatives satisfaction with conducted KOSMOS elements with questionary
9 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Implementation indicators
Time Frame: 9 months
Assessment of the quality of the implementation on each intervention by monthly visits and phone calls and review of the manuals.
9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Bettina S. Husebø, MD, PhD, University of Bergen
  • Principal Investigator: Elisabeth Flo, PysD, PhD, University of Bergen
  • Principal Investigator: Irene Aasmul, Master, University of Bergen
  • Principal Investigator: Christine Gulla, MD, University of Bergen
  • Principal Investigator: Torstein Habiger, University of Bergen
  • Principal Investigator: Tony Elvegaard, University of Bergen

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 7, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

September 12, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 15, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2016

Last Verified

September 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Communication

Subscribe