Pilot Study Evaluating Safety of Unilateral Gamma Knife Subthalamotomy for Parkinson's Disease (GKSTN)

December 4, 2017 updated by: NYU Langone Health
This is a pilot study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of unilateral gamma knife subthalamotomy for Parkinson's disease in patients deemed poor candidates for deep brain stimulation.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Detailed Description

The goal of the study is to enroll 20 subjects who could benefit from unilateral subthalamotomy due to the presence of unilateral rigidity, tremor, bradykinesia and/or dyskinesias (as opposed to axial symptoms such as walking) but who are suboptimal candidates for deep brain stimulation (DBS) because of advanced age (>74), medical comorbidities precluding surgery, or patient aversion to DBS, and who show more than 30% improvement in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) score in the ON versus OFF medication state.

Secondary objectives will focus on the efficacy of Gamma Knife (GK) subthalamotomy for Parkinson's disease (PD), as determined by changes in the patient's clinical status and any improvement following the treatment. A full neurologic exam as well as a screen for depression will be administered at every postoperative visit. The patient's neurologic function will be assessed with a full neurological examination and objectively quantified using the UPDRS focusing on the contralateral side, as well as overall UPDRS.

The clinician will complete a Clinical Global Impression (CGI) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) at each visit to record overall impression of the patient's disease progression and severity, and to evaluate cognitive function. Pre- and post-treatment assessment of the Levodopa Equivalent Daily Dose (LEDD) (quantification of medication regimen in levodopa equivalents) will be obtained and recorded to evaluated the efficacy of gamma knife subthalamotomy (GKS) as a treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD). A Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) to determine the patient's independence and quality of life will be filled out at each visit. Finally, the patient will complete a Beck Depression Inventory at each clinic visit to monitor for development or progression of depressive symptoms.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • NYU Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

74 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Primary care clinic

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Otherwise appropriate DBS candidates but deemed suboptimal for DBS on account of one or more of the following:

    • advanced age greater than 74 years of age
    • medical comorbidities

      • need for continual anticoagulation
      • poor candidates for general anesthesia based on cardiac, hepatic ,renal or pulmonary status
      • high infection risk if internal DBS device hardware is placed (ie. Poor diabetes mellitus control)
    • patient aversion to DBS
  2. Patients with asymmetric disease symptoms including:

    • rigidity
    • tremor
    • bradykinesia
    • dyskinesia
  3. More than 30% improvement in UPDRS score in ON versus OFF medication state, except:

    • in the presence of disabling contralateral dyskinesias/dystonia limiting dose tolerance
    • tremors that are medically refractory
  4. Patients who are on a stable medication regimen and demonstrating stable disease symptoms (absence of significant improvement or deterioration) for at least 3 months at the time of GKS, as determined by review of medical record
  5. MMSE score greater than or equal to 26

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with prominent axial symptoms including postural instability and gait disturbances, defined as a score of 3 or greater on Questions 28, 29 & 30 on the UPDRS
  • Patients whose symptoms do not improve by more than 30% in UPDRS score with medication, unless patient experiences dose-limiting side effects
  • The presence of dementia or inability to provide informed consent for participation in the study, as determined by a mini-mental status examination score below 25
  • Patients who have had prior brain radiation
  • Patients with improvement and satisfactory symptom management will not be offered this procedure. We will only include patients without satisfactory symptom management.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
GK subthalamotomy
Evaluate the safety and efficacy of unilateral GK subthalamotomy for PD in patients deemed poor candidates for DBS.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety of performing GK lesions in the Subthalamic Nucleus (STN) for PD patients
Time Frame: 12 months
  • Safety of GK subthalamotomy in the management of PD as measured by stable findings on neurologic exam at each clinic visit (hemiballismus, dyskinesias, sensory changes) and the absence of Serious Adverse Events (SAE) attributable to treatment.
  • Because this study does not have a control group, we will compare the non-inferiority of GK subthalamotomy to published outcomes in PD patients undergoing other forms of management.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy of GK subthalamotomy for PD
Time Frame: 12 months

To be determined by changes in the patient's clinical status and any improvement following the treatment.

  • Neurologic function as determined by UPDRS, MMSE, neurologic exam results, CGI assessment and LEDD score.
  • Quality of life, as determined by PDQ-39 score and Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI) score.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Douglas Kondziolka, MD, NYU Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

September 25, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 6, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2017

Last Verified

December 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinsons Disease

3
Subscribe