4-point vs 4-roll Canne as Walking Aids After Stroke (4roll)

October 22, 2019 updated by: Deltombe Thierry, University Hospital of Mont-Godinne

Comparison Between Classical 4-point Canne and 4-roll Canne on Gait Parameters (Gait Speed and Energy Cost) as Walking Aids After Stroke. A Multicentric Randomized Controled Cross-over Study

Stroke patients frequently necessitate walking aids such as 4-point canne. However, the 4-point canne has to be lifted by the patient which limited gait speed. The adjunction of small wheel below the 4 point of the canne (4-roll) gives the possibility to the patient to walk without having to lift the canne as it will roll over the ground.

The aim of our study is to compare gait parameters (gait speed and energy cost) with a classical 4-point canne and with 4-roll canne.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Stroke patients frequently need walking aids such as 4-point canne. However, the 4-point canne has to be lifted by the patient which limited gait speed. The adjunction of small wheel below the 4 point of the canne (4-roll) gives the possibility to the patient to walk without having to lift the canne as it will roll over the ground.

OBJECTIVE To compare the gait parameters with a 4-point canne and with a 4-roll canne METHODS The investigators will recruited stroke patients who necessitate 4 point-canne as walking aids. A 10 meters walking test, a 6 minutes walking test, an estimated energy cost and a patient's satisfaction will be monitored with a 4-point canne (day 1) and with a 4-roll canne (day 2) in a cross-over study. The first tested device will be randomized.

PERSPECTIVE The investigators hope to demonstrate that a 4-roll canne makes possible to walk faster in a safe way after stroke

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Yvoir, Belgium, 5530
        • Deltombe Thierry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • post stroke patient
  • able to walk 10 meters

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cognitive impairment limiting walking capacities
  • need support when walking

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 4-point canne
Stroke patients walk with 4-point canne
Experimental: 4-roll canne
Stroke patients walk with 4-roll canne

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
10 meters walking test at spontaneous speed
Time Frame: 2 days
2 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
10 meters walking test at fast speed
Time Frame: 2 days
2 days
6 minutes walking test
Time Frame: 2 days
2 days
Borg scale for perceived exertion
Time Frame: 2 days
2 days
Visual analogic scale for personal satisfaction
Time Frame: 2 days
2 days
Energy cost
Time Frame: 2 days
Extrapolated from heart rate while walking
2 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thierry Deltombe, MD, CHU Dinant Godinne / UcL Namur
  • Principal Investigator: Geoffroy Dellicour, PT, Centre Neurologique William Lennox Ottignies

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 28, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

October 30, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 25, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on 4-roll canne

Subscribe