COPD Aerosol Study Comparing the Efficacy of Nebulizers Versus Dry Powder Inhalers

February 28, 2019 updated by: Rajiv Dhand, MD, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine

A Randomized, Double-Dummy, Crossover, Single-Center Study Comparing the Efficacy of Nebulizers Versus Dry Powder Inhalers in the Treatment of Patients Recovering From Severe Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

The purpose of this study is to compare drug delivery and lung function after treatment with formoterol from a nebulizer versus a dry powder inhaler (DPI) in patients recovering from severe exacerbations of COPD. This is to determine if one device is superior in providing better lung function and drug deposition in this clinical setting.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

7

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tennessee
      • Knoxville, Tennessee, United States, 37920
        • University of Tennessee Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Current or past cigarette smoking history of >/= 10 pack-years.
  • FEV1/FVC ratio </= 70%.
  • Known diagnosis of COPD.
  • Current hospitalization for a primary diagnosis of acute exacerbation of COPD.
  • Must be able to understand and willing to sign an informed consent document.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • On a ventilator or mask ventilation.
  • Allergy or contraindication to Formoterol use.
  • Marked QTc prolongation (> 450 ms).
  • Liver cirrhosis or chronic renal insufficiency (serum creatinine > 2 mg/dL).
  • Atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response (heart rate > 110 bpm) or ventricular arrhythmia (frequent PVCs, ventricular tachycardia).
  • Acute myocardial infarction within 12 weeks of patient study registration.
  • Known pulmonary embolism.
  • Known or suspected lung cancer.
  • Known neuromuscular disease, stroke with residual hemiparesis, or untreated Parkinsonism
  • Pregnant or nursing women or women of childbearing potential not using a medically approved means of contraception (i.e., oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, diaphragm, or sub dermal implants).
  • Inability to understand instructions.
  • Participation in another investigational drug clinical trial within 30 days of patient study registration.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Formoterol via DPI then Formoterol via nebulizer

Group A: Received Formoterol 12 µg via DPI and placebo via nebulizer at treatment visit #1, and Formoterol 20 µg (solution form) via nebulizer and placebo via DPI at treatment visit 2.

Placebo: The placebo used will be sterile, preservative free, normal saline for nebulizer inhalation and a matched capsule without active drug for the dry powder inhaler. All patients will receive 2 ml of normal saline with the nebulizer to match the volume of nebulized formoterol solution. Patients will receive formoterol and placebo at both study visit #1 and visit #2.

Comparison of dosage administered via a nebulizer versus dosage administered via a dry powder inhaler. 12 µg Formoterol with the dry powder inhaler and 20 µg (solution form) of Formoterol with the nebulizer. Patients will receive formoterol and placebo at both study visit #1 and visit #2.
Other Names:
  • Foradil
  • PERFOROMIST
Comparison of drug administered via a nebulizer versus a dry powder inhaler. The placebo used will be sterile, preservative free, normal saline for inhalation for the nebulizer and a matched capsule without active drug for the dry powder inhaler. All patients will receive 2 ml of normal saline with the nebulizer to match the volume of nebulized formoterol solution. Patients will receive formoterol and placebo at both study visit #1 and visit #2.
Other Names:
  • Normal Saline
Active Comparator: Formoterol via nebulizer then Formoterol via DPI

Group B: Received Formoterol 20 µg (solution form) via nebulizer and placebo via a DPI at treatment visit #1, and Formoterol 12 µg via a DPI with placebo via nebulizer at treatment visit 2.

Placebo: The placebo used will be sterile, preservative free, normal saline for nebulizer inhalation and a matched capsule without active drug for the dry powder inhaler. All patients will receive 2 ml of normal saline with the nebulizer to match the volume of nebulized formoterol solution. Patients will receive formoterol and placebo at both study visit #1 and visit #2.

Comparison of dosage administered via a nebulizer versus dosage administered via a dry powder inhaler. 12 µg Formoterol with the dry powder inhaler and 20 µg (solution form) of Formoterol with the nebulizer. Patients will receive formoterol and placebo at both study visit #1 and visit #2.
Other Names:
  • Foradil
  • PERFOROMIST
Comparison of drug administered via a nebulizer versus a dry powder inhaler. The placebo used will be sterile, preservative free, normal saline for inhalation for the nebulizer and a matched capsule without active drug for the dry powder inhaler. All patients will receive 2 ml of normal saline with the nebulizer to match the volume of nebulized formoterol solution. Patients will receive formoterol and placebo at both study visit #1 and visit #2.
Other Names:
  • Normal Saline

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Difference Between the Values of Area Under the Response Curve for FEV1
Time Frame: Baseline through study completion (visit 1 through visit 2)
The difference between the values of area under the response curve for FEV1 from baseline through four hours (AUC FEV1 0-4h) after inhalation of formoterol with a nebulizer or a dry powder inhaler.
Baseline through study completion (visit 1 through visit 2)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage Change in Peak FEV1 From Baseline After Inhalation of Formoterol
Time Frame: From pre-dose formoterol (baseline 0hrs) to 30 minutes, 1,2, and 4 hours post dose at visit 1 and measured again at visit 2

Change in peak FEV1 from Baseline. This will be completed at visit 1 and visit 2.

Steps:

  1. A baseline (pre-dose formoterol) FEV1 will be recorded.
  2. Subjects will be dosed with formoterol.
  3. Serial FEV1 assessments will completed at 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hour, and 4 hour post dose of formoterol so a peak measurement can be recorded.
  4. A percentage of change between the baseline and peak FEV1 will be recorded for this outcome measure. A higher value indicates a better result.
From pre-dose formoterol (baseline 0hrs) to 30 minutes, 1,2, and 4 hours post dose at visit 1 and measured again at visit 2
Absolute Increase in FEV1 From Baseline After Inhalation of Formoterol
Time Frame: Measured at visit 1 and visit 2 after dosing and all FEV1 testing has been completed

Increase in FEV1 from Baseline to 4 hours post dose of formoterol. This will be completed at visit 1 and visit 2.

Steps:

  1. A baseline (pre-dose formoterol) FEV1 was recorded.
  2. Subjects was dosed with formoterol.
  3. Serial FEV1 assessments were completed, and recorded at 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hour, and 4 hour post dose of formoterol so serial FEV1 measurements could be recorded.
Measured at visit 1 and visit 2 after dosing and all FEV1 testing has been completed
Peak FEV1 Between the Two Devices (Nebulizer and DPI)
Time Frame: Measured from Start of visit 1 until the completion of visit 2

Change in peak FEV1 from Baseline. This will be completed at visit 1 and visit 2.

Steps:

  1. A baseline (pre-dose formoterol) FEV1 was recorded.
  2. Subjects were dosed with formoterol.
  3. Serial FEV1 assessments were completed at 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hour, and 4 hour post dose of formoterol so a peak measurement could recorded.

5. Peak measurements from visit 1 and visit 2 will be compared for any significant change in FEV1 values.

Measured from Start of visit 1 until the completion of visit 2
Change in FEV1 as a Percentage of Predicted Normal After Inhalation of Formoterol
Time Frame: Baseline through study completion (visit 1 through visit 2)

Change in FEV1 from Baseline through 4 hours post formoterol dose. This was completed at visit 1 and visit 2.

Steps:

  1. A baseline (pre-dose formoterol) FEV1 was recorded.
  2. Subjects were dosed with formoterol.
  3. Serial FEV1 assessments were completed at 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hour, and 4 hour post dose of formoterol and serial FEV1 values were recorded.
  4. A percentage of change from baseline FEV1 to each serial measurement of FEV1 was collected. The % of change at each time point was then used to get a measure of overall percentage change of the predicted FEV1 value.
Baseline through study completion (visit 1 through visit 2)
Area Under the Response Curve for FVC From Baseline Through Four Hours (AUC FVC0-4h) After Inhalation of Formoterol
Time Frame: Measured at visit 1 and again at the end of visit 2

Steps:

  1. A baseline (pre-dose formoterol) FVC was recorded.
  2. Subjects were dosed with formoterol.
  3. Serial FVC assessments were completed at 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hour, and 4 hour post dose of formoterol and serial FVC values were recorded.

Data was all time points were used to obtain the total area under the curve

Measured at visit 1 and again at the end of visit 2
Percentage Change in Peak FVC From Baseline After Inhalation of Formoterol
Time Frame: Measured at visit 1 and again at the end of visit 2
  1. A baseline (pre-dose formoterol) FVC was recorded.
  2. Subjects were dosed with formoterol.
  3. Serial FVC assessments were completed at 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hour, and 4 hour post dose of formoterol and serial FVC values were recorded.
  4. A percentage of change between the baseline and peak FVC will be recorded for this outcome measure.
Measured at visit 1 and again at the end of visit 2
Peak FVC Between the Two Devices (Nebulizer and DPI)
Time Frame: Peak FVC at visit 1 will be compared to the peak FVC at visit 2 for any significant change.

Steps:

  1. A baseline (pre-dose formoterol) FVC was recorded.
  2. Subjects were dosed with formoterol.
  3. Serial FVC assessments were completed at 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hour, and 4 hour post dose of formoterol and serial FVC values were recorded.
  4. Peak FVC was recorded for this outcome measure and compared amongst groups.
Peak FVC at visit 1 will be compared to the peak FVC at visit 2 for any significant change.
Change in Dyspnea Based on the Borg Dyspnea Scale for Shortness of Breath (Pre-dose Administration and 60 Minutes After Inhalation of Formoterol With a Nebulizer or a DPI)
Time Frame: Measured at visit 1 and again at the end of visit 2
The Shortness of Breath Modified Borg Dyspnea Scale The scale goes from 0-10, zero meaning no difficulty breathing and ten meaning maximal difficulty. A decrease of score indicates an improvement. Patients were asked to complete the scale pre-dose and again one hour post formoterol dose. This was completed at both visit 1 and visit 2. The value recorded was the difference between the baseline value and the post 60 minute value.
Measured at visit 1 and again at the end of visit 2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rajiv Dhand, MD, University of Tennessee Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

November 14, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COPD Exacerbation

Clinical Trials on Formoterol

3
Subscribe